- Access by Xinjiang University
asymmetry in from supersymmetric flavor changing interactions
Phys. Rev. D 71, 054006 – Published 3 March, 2005
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.71.054006
Abstract
Recently BABAR and Belle Collaborations have measured direct asymmetry in . The experimental value is substantially different from the QCD factorization prediction. We show that supersymmetry flavor changing neutral current interaction via gluonic dipole can explain the difference. asymmetries in other decays are predicted to be sizable. Taking this asymmetry as a constraint, we find that the allowed supersymmetry parameter space is considerably reduced compared with constraint from alone. We also find the allowed time-dependent asymmetries in and to be large. These predictions are quite different than those predicted in the standard model and can be tested in the near future.
Article Text
References (25)
- BABAR Collaboration, B. Aubert et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 131801 (2004); Belle Collaboration, Y. Chao et al., 93, 191802 (2004).
- Heavy Flavor Averaging Group [HFAG], http://www.slac.stanford.edu/xorg/hfag.
- BABAR Collaboration, B. Aubert et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 021804 (2004); Belle Collaboration, S. Nishida et al., 93, 031803 (2004).
- M. Giorgi, in Proceedings of ICHEP’04 (unpublished); Y. Sakai, in Proceedings of ICHEP’04 (unpublished).
- S. Nandi and A. Kundu, hep-ph/0407061; S. Khalil and E. Kou, hep-ph/0407284; S. Mishima and T. Yoshikawa, Phys. Rev. D 70, 094024 (2004); Y.-L. Wu and Y.-F. Zhou, 71, 021701 (2005); C.-K. Chua, H.-Y. Cheng, and A. Soni, 71, 014030 (2005).
- M. Beneke and M. Neubert, Nucl. Phys. B675, 333 (2003); M. Beneke, G. Buchalla, M. Neubert, and C. T. Sachrajda, B606, 245 (2001).
- D.-S. Du et al., Phys. Rev. D 67, 014023 (2003).
- Y.-Y. Keum, H.-n. Li, and A. I. Sanda, Phys. Lett. B 504, 6 (2001); Phys. Rev. D 63, 054008 (2001).
- G. Buchalla, A. Buras, and M. Lautenbacher, Rev. Mod. Phys. 68, 1125 (1996); A. Buras, M. Jamin, and M. Lautenbacher, Nucl. Phys. B400, 75 (1993); M. Ciuchini et al., ibid. B415, 403 (1994); N. Deshpande and X.-G. He, Phys. Lett. B 336, 471 (1994).
- K. Chetyrkin, M. Misiak, and M. Münz, Phys. Lett. B 400, 206 (1997).
- A. L. Kagan and M. Neubert, Phys. Rev. D 58, 094012 (1998).
- S. Bertolini, F. Borzumati, and A. Masiero, Nucl. Phys. B284, 321 (1987); S. Bertolini et al., ibid. 353, 591 (1991).
- F. Gabbiani et al., Nucl. Phys. B477, 321 (1996); A. Kagan, Phys. Rev. D 51, 6196 (1995).
- C.-K. Chua, X.-G. He, and W.-S. Hou, Phys. Rev. D 60, 014003 (1999); X.-G. He, J.-Y. Leou, and J.-Q. Shi, 64, 094018 (2001).
- R. Garisto and J. N. Ng, Phys. Lett. B 315, 372 (1993).
- A. Buras et al., Nucl. Phys. B611, 488 (2001); , ibid. B631, 219 (2002).
- Particle Data Group, Phys. Lett. B 592, 1 (2004).
- A. Masiero and H. Murajama, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 907 (1999).
- T. Falk, K. Olive, and M. Pospelov, Nucl. Phys. B560, 3 (1999).
- D. Atwood, M. Gronau, and A. Soni, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 185 (1997).
- P. Ko et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 141803 (2003); C.-K. Chua, W.-S. Hou, and M. Nagashima, 92, 201803 (2004).
- BABAR Collaboration, B. Aubert et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 201801 (2004).
- BABAR Collaboration, B. Aubert et al., Phys. Rev. D 70, 112006 (2004); Belle Collaboration, M. Nakao et al., 69, 112001 (2004).
- BABAR Collaboration, B. Aubert et al., hep-ex/0408072; Belle Collaboration, K. Abe et al., hep-ex/0409049.
- Belle Collaboration, K. Abe et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 261602 (2003).