Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Holes in the ghost condensate

D. Krotov1,2,3, C. Rebbi4, V. Rubakov1, and V. Zakharov5

  • 1Institute for Nuclear Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 60th October Anniversary prospect 7a, Moscow 117312, Russia
  • 2Moscow State University, Department of Physics, Vorobjevy Gory, Moscow, 119899, Russia
  • 3Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Physics, B. Cheremushkinskaya, 25, Moscow, 117259, Russia
  • 4Department of Physics, Boston University, 590 Commonwealth Avenue, Boston Massachusetts 02215, USA
  • 5Max-Planck Institut für Physik, Föringer Ring 6, 80805, München, Germany

Phys. Rev. D 71, 045014 – Published 25 February, 2005

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.71.045014

Abstract

In a recently proposed model of “ghost condensation,” spatially homogeneous states may mix, via tunneling, with inhomogeneous states which are somewhat similar to bubbles in the theory of false vacuum decay, the corresponding bubble nucleation rate being exponentially sensitive to the ultraviolet completion of the model. The conservation of energy and charge requires that the energy density is negative and the field is strongly unstable in a part of the nucleated bubble. Unlike in the theory of false vacuum decay, this region does not expand during subsequent real-time evolution. In the outer part, positive energy outgoing waves develop, which eventually form shocks. Behind the outgoing waves and away from the bubble center, the background settles down to its original value. The outcome of the entire process is thus a microscopic region of negative energy and strong field—“hole in the ghost condensate”—plus a collection of outgoing waves (particles of the ghost condensate field) carrying away finite energy.

Article Text

References (18)

  1. C. Charmousis, R. Gregory, and V. A. Rubakov, Phys. Rev. D 62, 067505 (2000); R. Gregory, V. A. Rubakov, and S. M. Sibiryakov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 5928 (2000).
  2. I. I. Kogan, S. Mouslopoulos, A. Papazoglou, G. G. Ross, and J. Santiago, Nucl. Phys. B584, 313 (2000).
  3. G. R. Dvali, G. Gabadadze, and M. Porrati, Phys. Lett. B 485, 208 (2000).
  4. T. Jacobson and D. Mattingly, Phys. Rev. D 64, 024028 (2001).
  5. K. Freese and M. Lewis, Phys. Lett. B 540, 1 (2002).
  6. S. M. Carroll, V. Duvvuri, M. Trodden, and M. S. Turner, Phys. Rev. D 70, 043528 (2004).
  7. N. Arkani-Hamed, H. C. Cheng, M. A. Luty, and S. Mukohyama, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2004) 074.
  8. B. Holdom, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2004) 063.
  9. C. Armendariz-Picon, V. Mukhanov, and P. J. Steinhardt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 4438 (2000); Phys. Rev. D 63, 103510 (2001).
  10. S. L. Dubovsky, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 07 (2004) 009.
  11. M. Peloso and L. Sorbo, Phys. Lett. B 593, 25 (2004).
  12. A. V. Frolov, Phys. Rev. D 70, 061501 (2004).
  13. I. Y. Kobzarev, L. B. Okun, and M. B. Voloshin, Yad. Fiz. 20, 1229 (1974) [Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 20, 644 (1975)].
  14. S. R. Coleman, Phys. Rev. D 15, 2929 (1977); 16, 1248(E) (1977).
  15. G. N. Felder, L. Kofman, and A. Starobinsky, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2002) 026.
  16. G. W. Gibbons, hep-th/0302199.
  17. K. M. Lee, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 263 (1988).
  18. S. R. Coleman and K. M. Lee, Nucl. Phys. B329, 387 (1990).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation