Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

α-states in de Sitter space

Jan de Boer1,*, Vishnu Jejjala2,†, and Djordje Minic2,‡

  • 1Instituut voor Theoretische Fysica, Valckenierstraat 65, 1018XE Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • 2Institute for Particle Physics and Astrophysics, Physics Department, Robeson Hall, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061, USA

  • *Electronic address: jdeboer@science.uva.nl
  • Electronic address: vishnu@vt.edu
  • Electronic address: dminic@vt.edu

Phys. Rev. D 71, 044013 – Published 10 February, 2005

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.71.044013

Abstract

Field theory in de Sitter space admits a one-parameter family of vacua determined by a superselection parameter α. Of these vacua, the Euclidean vacuum uniquely extrapolates to the vacuum of flat Minkowski space. States which resemble the α-vacua can be constructed as excitations above the Euclidean vacuum. Such states have modes α(k) which decay faster that k(1d)/2. Fields in such states exhibit nonlocal correlations when examined from the perspective of fields in the Euclidean vacuum. The dynamics of such entangled states are fully consistent. If an α-state with properties that interpolate between an α-vacuum and the Euclidean vacuum were the initial condition for inflation, a signature for this may be found in a momentum dependent correction to the inflationary power spectrum. The functional formalism, which provides the tool for examining physics in an α-state, extends to fields of other spin. In particular, the extension to spin-2 may proffer a new class of infrared modifications to gravitational interactions. The implications of superselection sectors for the landscape of string vacua are briefly discussed.

Article Text

References (54)

  1. A. H. Guth, Phys. Rev. D 23, 347 (1981); A. D. Linde, Particle Physics and Inflationary Cosmology (Harwood, Chur, Switzerland, 1990).
  2. C. L. Bennett et al., Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 148, 1 (2003); D. N. Spergel et al., 148, 175 (2003).
  3. W. de Sitter, Proc. R. Acad. Sci. 19, 1217 (1917); 20, 229 (1917).
  4. E. Witten, hep-th/0106109.
  5. E. Mottola, Phys. Rev. D 31, 754 (1985).
  6. B. Allen, Phys. Rev. D 32, 3136 (1985).
  7. E. A. Tagirov, Ann. Phys. (Leipzig) 76, 561 (1973); P. Candelas and D. J. Raine, Phys. Rev. D 12, 965 (1975); I. T. Drummond, Nucl. Phys. B94, 115 (1975); J. S. Dowker and R. Critchley, Phys. Rev. D 13, 224 (1976).
  8. G. W. Gibbons and S. W. Hawking, Phys. Rev. D 15, 2738 (1977).
  9. T. S. Bunch and P. C. W. Davies, Proc. R. Soc. London A 360, 117 (1978).
  10. C. J. C. Burges, Nucl. Phys. B247, 533 (1984).
  11. B. Ratra, Phys. Rev. D 31, 1931 (1985).
  12. See, for example, M. O. Scully and M. S. Zubairy, Quantum Optics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1997).
  13. M. B. Einhorn and F. Larsen, Phys. Rev. D 67, 024001 (2003); K. Goldstein and D. A. Lowe, Nucl. Phys. B669, 325 (2003); M. B. Einhorn and F. Larsen, Phys. Rev. D 68, 064002 (2003); H. Collins, R. Holman, and M. R. Martin, 68, 124012 (2003); K. Goldstein and D. A. Lowe, 69, 023507 (2004).
  14. N. Kaloper, M. Kleban, A. E. Lawrence, and S. Shenker, Phys. Rev. D 66, 123510 (2002); N. Kaloper, M. Kleban, A. Lawrence, S. Shenker, and L. Susskind, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2002) 037. See also R. H. Brandenberger and J. Martin, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 17, 3663 (2002); C. P. Burgess, J. M. Cline, F. Lemieux, and R. Holman, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2003) 048.
  15. U. H. Danielsson, Phys. Rev. D 66, 023511 (2002); J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2002) 040; L. Bergstrom and U. H. Danielsson, 12 (2002) 038. See also R. Easther, B. R. Greene, W. H. Kinney, and G. Shiu, Phys. Rev. D 66, 023518 (2002); J. Martin and R. Brandenberger, 68, 063513 (2003); U. H. Danielsson, 71, 023516 (2005).
  16. K. Schalm, G. Shiu, and J. P. van der Schaar, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2004) 076; M. Porrati, Phys. Lett. B 596, 306 (2004); K. Schalm, G. Shiu, and J. P. van der Schaar, hep-th/0412288; B. R. Greene, K. Schalm, G. Shiu, and J. P. van der Schaar, hep-th/0411217.
  17. J. C. Niemeyer, Phys. Rev. D 63, 123502 (2001); A. Kempf, 63, 083514 (2001); J. C. Niemeyer and R. Parentani, 64, 101301 (2001); A. Kempf and J. C. Niemeyer, 64, 103501 (2001); S. Shankaranarayanan, Classical Quantum Gravity 20, 75 (2003); G. L. Alberghi, R. Casadio, and A. Tronconi, Phys. Lett. B 579, 1 (2004); R. Easther, W. H. Kinney, and H. Peiris, astro-ph/0412613.
  18. F. Larsen and R. McNees, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2003) 051; 07 (2004) 062.
  19. A. Aguirre, C. P. Burgess, A. Friedland, and D. Nolte, Classical Quantum Gravity 18, R223 (2001).
  20. Recent attempts include N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dimopoulos, G. Dvali, and G. Gabadadze, hep-th/0209227; N. Arkani-Hamed, H. C. Cheng, M. A. Luty, and S. Mukohyama, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2004) 074; N. Arkani-Hamed, P. Creminelli, S. Mukohyama, and M. Zaldarriaga, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 04 (2004) 001. The subject has a long history; early attempts at modifying Einstein gravity include M. Fierz and W. Pauli, Proc. R. Soc. London A 173, 211 (1939); C. Brans and R. H. Dicke, Phys. Rev. 124, 925 (1961); R. H. Dicke, 125, 2163 (1962); P. G. Bergmann, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 1, 25 (1968).
  21. N. D. Birrell and P. C. W. Davies, Quantum Fields in Curved Space (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1982).
  22. V. Balasubramanian, P. Horava, and D. Minic, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2001) 043; M. Spradlin, A. Strominger, and A. Volovich, hep-th/0110007.
  23. C. Schomblond and P. Spindel, Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré 25, 67 (1976).
  24. B. Allen and T. Jacobson, Commun. Math. Phys. 103, 669 (1986).
  25. J. Bros and U. Moschella, Rev. Math. Phys. 8, 327 (1996); J. Bros, H. Epstein, and U. Moschella, Commun. Math. Phys. 196, 535 (1998).
  26. A. Strominger, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2001) 034.
  27. V. Balasubramanian, J. de Boer, and D. Minic, Phys. Rev. D 65, 123508 (2002).
  28. V. Balasubramanian, J. de Boer, and D. Minic, Classical Quantum Gravity 19, 5655 (2002); Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 303, 59 (2003).
  29. M. I. Park, Phys. Lett. B 440, 275 (1998); Nucl. Phys. B544, 377 (1999).
  30. R. Bousso, A. Maloney, and A. Strominger, Phys. Rev. D 65, 104039 (2002).
  31. J. B. Hartle and S. W. Hawking, Phys. Rev. D 28, 2960 (1983).
  32. R. Laflamme, Phys. Lett. B 198, 156 (1987); J. J. Halliwell, Phys. Rev. D 43, 2590 (1991).
  33. A. A. Starobinsky and I. I. Tkachev, JETP Lett. 76, 235 (2002) [Pis'ma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 76, 291 (2002)].
  34. K. Goldstein and D. A. Lowe, Phys. Rev. D 67, 063502 (2003).
  35. U. H. Danielsson, J. High Energy Phys. 12, 025 (2002).
  36. R. Floreanini, C. T. Hill, and R. Jackiw, Ann. Phys. (Leipzig) 175, 345 (1987).
  37. J. Maldacena, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2003) 013, and references therein.
  38. For a review, see R. Jackiw, in Current Algebra and Anomalies, edited by S. B. Treiman, E. Witten, R. Jackiw, and B. Zumino (World Scientific, Singapore, 1985). Solutions to the Strong CP problem are addressed in R. D. Peccei and H. R. Quinn, Phys. Rev. Lett. 38, 1440 (1977); Phys. Rev. D 16, 1791 (1977). See also F. Wilczek, Phys. Rev. Lett. 40, 279 (1978); S. Weinberg, 40, 223 (1978).
  39. For a recent review, see G. Gabadadze and M. Shifman, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 17, 3689 (2002).
  40. H. Collins and R. Holman, Phys. Rev. D 70, 084019 (2004).
  41. F. Leblond, D. Marolf, R. C. Myersand , J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2002) 052; 01 (2003) 003.
  42. J. W. S. Rayleigh, Philos. Mag. 35, 1 (1918).
  43. S. Chandrasekhar, Radiative Transfer (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1950).
  44. A. L. Hodgkin, The Conduction of Nervous Impulse (Thomas, Springfield, IL, 1964).
  45. G. A. Baraff, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 11, 1938 (1970).
  46. J. M. Maldacena, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2003) 021. See also V. Balasubramanian, P. Kraus, A. E. Lawrence, and S. P. Trivedi, Phys. Rev. D 59, 104021 (1999).
  47. H. Umezawa, Advanced Field Theory: Micro, Macro, and Thermal Physics (AIP, New York, 1993).
  48. N. Kaloper and M. Kaplinghat, Phys. Rev. D 68, 123522 (2003).
  49. R. P. Feynman and F. L. Vernon, Ann. Phys. (Leipzig) 24, 118 (1963); 281, 547 (2000); R. P. Feynman, Statistical Mechanics (Addison-Wesley, New York, 1990).
  50. A. O. Caldeira and A. J. Leggett, Phys. Rev. Lett. 46, 211 (1981); Physica (Amsterdam) 121A, 587 (1983); Ann. Phys. (Leipzig) 149, 374 (1983).
  51. G. W. Gibbons, in GIFT Seminar on Supersymmetry, Supergravity and Related Topics,, edited by F. del Aguila, J. A. de Azcarraga, and L. E. Ibanez (World Scientific, Singapore, 1984); J. M. Maldacena and C. Nunez, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 16, 822 (2001). See also C. M. Hull, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2001) 012; K.-i. Maeda and N. Ohta, Phys. Lett. B 597, 400 (2004), and references therein.
  52. S. Kachru, R. Kallosh, A. Linde, and S. P. Trivedi, Phys. Rev. D 68, 046005 (2003).
  53. R. M. Wald, Phys. Rev. D 28, 2118 (1982). See also R. M. Wald, Quantum Field Theory in Curved Spacetime and Black Hole Thermodynamics (Chicago University Press, Chicago 1994).
  54. For recent discussion of the anthropic principle, see R. Bousso and J. Polchinski, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2000) 006; L. Susskind, hep-th/0302219, and references therein. The notion of tuning the cosmological constant has a long history. See, for example, A. D. Linde, Phys. Lett. 129B, 177 (1983); S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 2607 (1987); String Theory in Four Dimensions, edited by M. Dine (Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, 1988); H. Martel, P. R. Shapiro, and S. Weinberg, Astrophys. J. 492, 29 (1998). An alternate view, in which the cosmological constant is fixed, is presented in T. Banks and W. Fischler, hep-th/0310288. A dynamical cosmological constant is considered in D. Minic and C. H. Tze, Phys. Rev. D 68, 061501 (2003); D. Minic and C. H. Tze, Phys. Lett. B 581, 111 (2004); hep-th/0401028; V. Jejjala, D. Minic, and C. H. Tze, gr-qc/0406037. The implications of superselection parameters for quantum gravity have been discussed previously in two dimensions: N. Seiberg and S. H. Shenker, Phys. Rev. D 45, 4581 (1992).

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation