- Access by Xinjiang University
Brane cosmological evolution with a general bulk matter configuration
Phys. Rev. D 71, 043506 – Published 10 February, 2005
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.71.043506
Abstract
Using a fully covariant treatment for the description of the bulk geometry, we study the brane cosmological evolution in the presence of a smooth bulk matter distribution. We focus on the case of a Friedmann-Robertson-Walker brane, invariantly characterized by the existence of a six-dimensional group of isometries acting on 3D spacelike orbits. With a Friedmann-Robertson-Walker brane, the bulk geometry can be regarded as the 5D generalization of the inhomogeneous orthogonal family of locally rotationally symmetric spacetimes. We show that, for any bulk matter configuration, the expansion rate on the brane depends only on the covariantly defined comoving mass of the bulk fluid within a radius equal to the average length scale of the 3D spacelike hypersurfaces of constant curvature. This unique contribution incorporates the effects of the 5D Weyl tensor and the projected tensor related to the bulk matter, and gives a transparent physical picture that includes an effective conservation equation between the brane and the bulk matter.
Article Text
References (18)
- L. Randall and R. Sundrum, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 3370 (1999); 83, 4690 (1999).
- P. Binetruy, C. Deffayet, and D. Langlois, Nucl. Phys. B565, 269 (2000); P. Binetruy, C. Deffayet, U. Ellwanger, and D. Langlois, Phys. Lett. B 477, 285 (2000).
- C. Csaki, M. Graesser, C. F. Kolda, and J. Terning, Phys. Lett. B 462, 34 (1999); J. M. Cline, C. Grojean, and G. Servant, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 4245 (1999).
- P. Kraus, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (1999) 011.
- T. Shiromizu, K. i. Maeda, and M. Sasaki, Phys. Rev. D 62, 024012 (2000).
- P. Brax and C. van de Bruck, Classical Quantum Gravity 20, R201 (2003).
- R. Maartens, Living Rev. Relativity 7, 7 (2003).
- A. Hebecker and J. March-Russell, Nucl. Phys. B608, 375 (2001); D. Langlois, L. Sorbo, and M. Rodriguez-Martinez, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 171301 (2002); E. Leeper, R. Maartens, and C. F. Sopuerta, Classical Quantum Gravity 21, 1125 (2004).
- N. Tetradis, Classical Quantum Gravity 21, 5221 (2004).
- H. A. Chamblin H. S. Realland , Nucl. Phys. B562, 133 (1999); C. Barcelo and M. Visser, Phys. Rev. D 63, 024004 (2001); K. i. Maeda and D. Wands, 62, 124009 (2000); A. Mennim and R. A. Battye, Classical Quantum Gravity 18, 2171 (2001).
- C. van de Bruck, M. Dorca, C. J. A. Martins, and M. Parry, Phys. Lett. B 495, 183 (2000).
- E. Kiritsis, G. Kofinas, N. Tetradis, T. N. Tomaras, and V. Zarikas, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2003) 035; N. Tetradis, Phys. Lett. B 569, 1 (2003).
- P. S. Apostolopoulos and N. Tetradis, Classical Quantum Gravity 21, 4781 (2004).
- H. van Elst and G. F. R. Ellis, Classical Quantum Gravity 13, 1099 (1996).
- W. Israel, Nuovo Cimento B 44S10, 1 (1966).
- G. F. R. Ellis, gr-qc/9812046.
- D. Birmingham, Classical Quantum Gravity 16, 1197 (1999).
- S. Mukohyama, T. Shiromizu, and K. i. Maeda, Phys. Rev. D 62, 024028 (2000); 63, 029901(E) (2001); P. Bowcock, C. Charmousis, and R. Gregory, Classical Quantum Gravity 17, 4745 (2000).