Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Sparticle spectrum and phenomenology in split supersymmetry: Some possibilities

Biswarup Mukhopadhyaya*

Soumitra SenGupta

  • Harish-Chandra Research Institute, Chhatnag Road, Jhusi, Allahabad - 211 019, India

  • Department of Theoretical Physics, Indian Association for the Cultivation of Science, Jadavpur, Kolkata- 700 032, India

  • *E-mail: biswarup@mri.ernet.in
  • E-mail: tpssg@iacs.res.in

Phys. Rev. D 71, 035004 – Published 3 February, 2005

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.71.035004

Abstract

We investigate the split supersymmetry (SUSY) scenario recently proposed by Arkani-Hamed and Dimopoulos, where the scalars are heavy but the fermions are within the TeV range. We show that the sparticle spectrum in such a case crucially depends on the specific details of the mechanism underlying the SUSY breaking scheme, and the accelerator signals are also affected by it. In particular, we demonstrate in the context of a braneworld-inspired model, used as illustration in the original work, that a new fermion ψX, arising from the SUSY breaking sector, is shown to control low-energy phenomenology in several cases. Also, SUSY signals are characterized by the associated production of the light neutral Higgs. In an alternative scenario where the gauginos are assumed to propagate in the bulk, we find that gluinos can be heavy and short-lived, and the SUSY breaking scale can be free of cosmological constraints.

Article Text

References (12)

  1. N. Arkani-Hamed and S. Dimopoulos, hep-th/0405159.
  2. S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 2607 (1987); R. Bousso and J. Polchinski, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2000) 006; L. Susskind, hep-th/0302219; M. Douglas, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2003) 046; S. Kachru, R. Kallosh, A. Linde, and S. P. Trivedi, Phys. Rev. D 68, 046005 (2003).
  3. M. R. Douglas, hep-th/0405279.
  4. G. F. Giudice and A. Romanino, Nucl. Phys. B 699, 65 (2004).
  5. X. Calmet, hep-ph/0406314.
  6. A. Arvanitaki, C. Davis, P. W. Graham, and J. G. Wacker, Phys. Rev. D 70, 117703 (2004); A. Pierce, 70, 075006 (2004); S. Profumo, C. E. Yaguna, hep-ph/0407036; S. Zhu, Phys. Lett. B 604, 207 (2004); M. Dine, E. Gorbatov, and S. Thomas, hep-th/0407043; P. H. Chankowski, A. Falkowski, S. Pokorski, and J. Wagner, Phys. Lett. B 598, 252 (2004); M. Cvetic, P. Langacker, T. Li, and T. Liu, hep-th/0407178; E. Silverstein, hep-th/0407202.
  7. D. Marti and A. Pomarol, Phys. Rev. D 64, 105025 (2001); D. E. Kaplan and N. Weiner, 66, 026006 (2002); M. Luty and N. Okada, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2003) 050.
  8. W. D. Linch, M. Luty, and J. Phillips, Phys. Rev. D 68, 025008 (2003).
  9. J. Bagger, F. Feruglio, and F. Zwirner, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2002) 010.
  10. J. Scherk and J. H. Schwarz, Nucl. Phys. B 153, 61 (1979).
  11. P. Horava, Phys. Rev. D 54, 7561 (1996).
  12. Z. Chako and M. Luty, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2001) 067; T. Kobayashi and K. Yoshioka, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 5527 (2000).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation