Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Implications of the present bound on the width of the Θ+(1540)

R. L. Jaffe* and Ambar Jain

  • Center for Theoretical Physics, Department of Physics and Laboratory for Nuclear Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA

  • *Electronic address: jaffe@mit.edu
  • Electronic address: ambarj@mit.edu

Phys. Rev. D 71, 034012 – Published 14 February, 2005

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.71.034012

Abstract

The recently reported Θ+(1540) exotic baryon seems to be very narrow: Γ(Θ)<1MeV according to some analyses. Using methods of low energy scattering theory, we develop expectations for the width of the Θ, an elastic resonance in KN scattering in a theory where the characteristic range of interactions is 1   Fermi. If the Θ is a potential scattering resonance, generated by the forces in the KN channel, its width is hard to account for unless the KN-channel orbital angular momentum is two or greater. If the Θ is generated by dynamics in a confined channel, its coupling to the scattering channel is at least an order of magnitude less than the coupling of the Λ(1520) unless 2. Either way, if the Θ proves to be in the KN s- or p-wave, new physics must be responsible for its narrow width.

Article Text

References (16)

  1. For a recent review of the experimental situation, see G. Trilling in S. Eidelman et al.Particle Data Group Collaboration, , Phys. Lett. B 592, 1 (2004).
  2. For a summary, see T. Nakano and K. Hicks, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 19, 645 (2004).
  3. R. N. Cahn and G. H. Trilling, Phys. Rev. D 69, 011501 (2004).
  4. S. Nussinov, hep-ph/0307357.
  5. R. A. Arndt, I. I. Strakovsky, and R. L. Workman, Phys. Rev. C 68, 042201 (2003); 69, 019901(E) (2004).
  6. A. Sibirtsev, J. Haidenbauer, S. Krewald, and U. G. Meissner, Phys. Lett. B 599, 230 (2004).
  7. See Ref. [1] for further references and discussion.
  8. U. Fano, Nuovo Cimento 12, 154 (1935); Phys. Rev. 124, 1866 (1961).
  9. H. Feshbach, Ann. Phys. (Leipzig) 5, 357 (1958).
  10. This case was mentioned in Ref. [11]
  11. R. L. Jaffe and F. Wilczek, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 232003 (2003).
  12. D. Diakonov, V. Petrov, and M. V. Polyakov, Z. Phys. A 359, 305 (1997).
  13. For a critical discussion of Ref. [12], see R. L. Jaffe, Eur. Phys. J. C 35, 221 (2004); D. Diakonov, V. Petrov, and M. Polyakov, hep-ph/0404212; R. L. Jaffe, hep-ph/0405268.
  14. M. P. Mattis and M. Karliner, Phys. Rev. D 31, 2833 (1985); 34, 1991 (1986); N. Itzhaki, I. R. Klebanov, P. Ouyang, and L. Rastelli, Nucl. Phys. B684, 264 (2004).
  15. M. Karliner and H. J. Lipkin, hep-ph/0307243; Phys. Lett. B 575, 249 (2003).
  16. J. J. Sakurai, Modern Quantum Mechanics (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1994).

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation