Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Heating (gapless) color-flavor locked quark matter

Kenji Fukushima

Chris Kouvaris

Krishna Rajagopal

  • Center for Theoretical Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA
  • Department of Physics, University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan

  • Center for Theoretical Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA

  • Center for Theoretical Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA

Phys. Rev. D 71, 034002 – Published 1 February, 2005

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.71.034002

Abstract

We explore the phase diagram of neutral quark matter at high baryon density as a function of the temperature T and the strange quark mass Ms. At T=0, there is a sharp distinction between the insulating color-flavor locked (CFL) phase, which occurs where Ms2/μ<2Δ, and the metallic gapless CFL phase, which occurs at larger Ms2/μ. Here, μ is the chemical potential for quark number and Δ is the gap in the CFL phase. We find this distinction blurred at T0, as the CFL phase undergoes an insulator to metal crossover when it is heated. We present an analytic treatment of this crossover. At higher temperatures, we map out the phase transition lines at which the gap parameters Δ1, Δ2, and Δ3 describing ds pairing, us pairing and ud pairing, respectively, go to zero in an Nambu–Jona-Lasinio (NJL) model. For small values of Ms2/μ, we find that Δ2 vanishes first, then Δ1, then Δ3. We find agreement with a previous Ginzburg-Landau analysis of the form of these transitions and find quantitative agreement with results obtained in full QCD at asymptotic density for ratios of coefficients in the Ginzburg-Landau potential. At larger Ms2/μ, we find that Δ1 vanishes first, then Δ2, then Δ3. Hence, we find a “doubly critical” point in the (Ms2/μ,T) plane at which two lines of second order phase transitions (Δ10 and Δ20) cross. Because we do not make any small-Ms approximation, if we choose a relatively strong coupling leading to large gap parameters, we are able to pursue the analysis of the phase diagram all the way up to such large values of Ms that there are no strange quarks present.

Article Text

References (46)

  1. For reviews, see K. Rajagopal and F. Wilczek, hep-ph/0011333; M. G. Alford, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 51, 131 (2001); G. Nardulli, Riv. Nuovo Cimento 25N3, 1 (2002); S. Reddy, Acta Phys. Pol. B 33, 4101 (2002); T. Schäfer, hep-ph/0304281; M. Alford, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 153, 1 (2004).
  2. M. G. Alford, K. Rajagopal, and F. Wilczek, Nucl. Phys. B537, 443 (1999).
  3. K. Iida and G. Baym, Phys. Rev. D 63, 074018 (2001); 66, 059903 (2002).
  4. M. Alford and K. Rajagopal, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2002) 031.
  5. M. Alford, C. Kouvaris, and K. Rajagopal, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 222001 (2004).
  6. M. Alford, C. Kouvaris, and K. Rajagopal, Phys. Rev. D (to be published).
  7. A. Schmitt, Q. Wang, and D. H. Rischke, Phys. Rev. D 66, 114010 (2002).
  8. B. I. Halperin, T. C. Lubensky, and S. K. Ma, Phys. Rev. Lett. 32, 292 (1974).
  9. T. Matsuura, K. Iida, T. Hatsuda, and G. Baym, Phys. Rev. D 69, 074012 (2004).
  10. I. Giannakis, D. F. Hou, H. C. Ren, and D. H. Rischke, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 232301 (2004).
  11. A. W. Steiner, S. Reddy, and M. Prakash, Phys. Rev. D 66, 094007 (2002).
  12. P. F. Bedaque and T. Schafer, Nucl. Phys. A697, 802 (2002); D. B. Kaplan and S. Reddy, Phys. Rev. D 65, 054042 (2002); A. Kryjevski, D. B. Kaplan, and T. Schafer, hep-ph/0404290.
  13. A. Kryjevski and T. Schaefer, hep-ph/0407329; A. Kryjevski and D. Yamada, hep-ph/0407350.
  14. W. V. Liu, F. Wilczek, and P. Zoller, cond-mat/0404478.
  15. S. B. Rüster, I. A. Shovkovy, and D. H. Rischke, Nucl. Phys. A743, 127 (2004).
  16. K. Iida, T. Matsuura, M. Tachibana, and T. Hatsuda, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 132001 (2004).
  17. M. Iwasaki and T. Iwado, Phys. Lett. B 350, 163 (1995); M. G. Alford, K. Rajagopal, and F. Wilczek, 422, 247 (1998); R. D. Pisarski and D. H. Rischke, Phys. Rev. D 61, 051501 (2000); 61, 074017 (2000); T. Schafer, 62, 094007 (2000); M. Buballa, J. Hosek, and M. Oertel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 182002 (2003); M. G. Alford, J. A. Bowers, J. M. Cheyne, and G. A. Cowan, Phys. Rev. D 67, 054018 (2003); A. Schmitt, nucl-th/0405076.
  18. K. Iida and G. Baym, Phys. Rev. D 66, 014015 (2002).
  19. M. G. Alford, J. Berges, and K. Rajagopal, Nucl. Phys. B558, 219 (1999).
  20. M. G. Alford, J. Berges, and K. Rajagopal, Nucl. Phys. B571, 269 (2000).
  21. D. K. Hong, Nucl. Phys. B582, 451 (2000); N. J. Evans, J. Hormuzdiar, S. D. H. Hsu, and M. Schwetz, B581, 391 (2000).
  22. R. Rapp, T. Schafer, E. V. Shuryak, and M. Velkovsky, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 280, 35 (2000).
  23. T. Schafer, Nucl. Phys. B575, 269 (2000).
  24. C. Manuel and M. H. G. Tytgat, Phys. Lett. B 479, 190 (2000).
  25. T. Schafer, Phys. Rev. D 65, 094033 (2002).
  26. D. T. Son and M. A. Stephanov, Phys. Rev. D 61, 074012 (2000); 62, 059902 (2000).
  27. D. K. Hong, T. Lee, and D. P. Min, Phys. Lett. B 477, 137 (2000); S. R. Beane, P. F. Bedaque, and M. J. Savage, 483, 131 (2000); T. Schafer, Phys. Rev. D 65, 074006 (2002).
  28. S. Reddy, M. Sadzikowski, and M. Tachibana, Nucl. Phys. A714, 337 (2003).
  29. P. Jaikumar, M. Prakash, and T. Schafer, Phys. Rev. D 66, 063003 (2002); I. A. Shovkovy and P. J. Ellis, Phys. Rev. C 66, 015802 (2002).
  30. J. Kundu and S. Reddy, Phys. Rev. C 70, 055803 (2004).
  31. P. Amore, M. C. Birse, J. A. McGovern, and N. R. Walet, Phys. Rev. D 65, 074005 (2002).
  32. A. Gerhold and A. Rebhan, Phys. Rev. D 68, 011502 (2003); A. Kryjevski, 68, 074008 (2003); D. D. Dietrich and D. H. Rischke, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 53, 305 (2004).
  33. K. Rajagopal and F. Wilczek, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 3492 (2001).
  34. J. M. Cornwall, R. Jackiw, and E. Tomboulis, Phys. Rev. D 10, 2428 (1974).
  35. M. Buballa and M. Oertel, Nucl. Phys. A703, 770 (2002); F. Neumann, M. Buballa, and M. Oertel, A714, 481 (2003).
  36. I. Shovkovy and M. Huang, Phys. Lett. B 564, 205 (2003); M. Huang and I. Shovkovy, Nucl. Phys. A729, 835 (2003).
  37. E. Gubankova, W. V. Liu, and F. Wilczek, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 032001 (2003).
  38. P. Fulde and R. A. Ferrell, Phys. Rev. 135, 550A (1964); S. Takada and T. Izuyama, Prog. Theor. Phys. 41, 635 (1969); M. G. Alford, J. A. Bowers, and K. Rajagopal, Phys. Rev. D 63, 074016 (2001); J. A. Bowers, J. Kundu, K. Rajagopal, and E. Shuster, 64, 014024 (2001); J. Kundu and K. Rajagopal, 65, 094022 (2002); J. A. Bowers and K. Rajagopal, 66, 065002 (2002); R. Casalbuoni G. Nardulliand , Rev. Mod. Phys. 263, 320 (2004).
  39. G. Sarma, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 24, 1029 (1963).
  40. M. G. Alford, J. Berges, and K. Rajagopal, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 598 (2000).
  41. A. Sedrakian and U. Lombardo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 602 (2000); J. F. Liao and P. F. Zhuang, Phys. Rev. D 68, 114016 (2003).
  42. R. Casalbuoni, M. Ciminale, M. Mannarelli, G. Nardulli, M. Ruggieri, and R. Gatto, Phys. Rev. D 70, 054004 (2004).
  43. G. W. Carter and S. Reddy, Phys. Rev. D 62, 103002 (2000).
  44. M. Huang and I. A. Shovkovy, Phys. Rev. D 70, 051501 (2004); hep-ph/0408325.
  45. P. F. Bedaque, Nucl. Phys. A697, 569 (2002); P. F. Bedaque, H. Caldas, and G. Rupak, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 247002 (2003); H. Caldas, Phys. Rev. A 69, 063602 (2004); M. M. Forbes, E. Gubankova, W. V. Liu, and F. Wilczek, hep-ph/0405059; S. Reddy and G. Rupak, nucl-th/0405054 [Phys. Rev. C (to be published)].
  46. M. Alford, C. Kouvaris, and K. Rajagopal, hep-ph/0407257.

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation