Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Precise analytical description of the Earth matter effect on oscillations of low energy neutrinos

A. N. Ioannisian1,2, N. A. Kazarian2, A. Yu. Smirnov3, and D. Wyler4

  • 1Yerevan Physics Institute, Alikhanian Brothers 2, 375036 Yerevan, Armenia
  • 2Institute for Theoretical Physics and Modeling, 375036 Yerevan, Armenia
  • 3ICTP, Strada Costiera 11, 34014 Trieste, Italy
  • 4Institut für Theoretische Physik, Universität Zürich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, CH-8057 Zürich, Switzerland

Phys. Rev. D 71, 033006 – Published 23 February, 2005

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.71.033006

Abstract

We present a formalism for the matter effects in the Earth on low energy neutrino fluxes which is both accurate and has all the advantages of a full analytic treatment. The oscillation probabilities are calculated up to the second order term in ϵ(x)2V(x)E/Δm2, where V(x) is the neutrino potential at position x. We show the absence of large undamped phases which makes the expansion in ϵ well behaved. An improved expansion is presented in terms of the variation of V(x) around a suitable mean value which allows one to treat energies up to those relevant for supernova neutrinos. We discuss also the case of three-neutrino mixing.

Article Text

References (30)

  1. L. Wolfenstein, Phys. Rev. D 17, 2369 (1978); in Purdue University Report No. C3, 1978.
  2. V. D. Barger, K. Whisnant, S. Pakvasa, and R. J. N. Phillips, Phys. Rev. D 22, 2718 (1980).
  3. S. P. Mikheyev and A. Yu. Smirnov, in 1986 Massive Neutrinos in Astrophysics and in Particle Physics, Proceedings of the Sixth Moriond Workshop, edited by O. Fackler and J. Trân Thanh Vân (Editions Frontières, Gif-sur-Yvette, 1986), p. 355.
  4. J. Bouchez et al., Z. Phys. C 32, 499 (1986); M. Cribier et al., Phys. Lett. B 182, 89 (1986); E. D. Carlson, Phys. Rev. D 34, 1454 (1986).
  5. A. J. Baltz and J. Weneser, Phys. Rev. D 35, 528 (1987).
  6. S. P. Mikheyev and A. Yu. Smirnov, Sov. Phys. Usp. 30, 759 (1987); L. Cherry and K. Lande, Phys. Rev. D 36, 3571 (1987); S. Hiroi, H. Sakuma, T. Yanagida, and M. Yoshimura, Phys. Lett. B 198, 403 (1987); Prog. Theor. Phys. 78, 1428 (1987); A. Dar, A. Mann, Y. Melina, and D. Zajfman, Phys. Rev. D 35, 3607 (1987); A. J. Baltz and J. Weneser, 37, 3364 (1988); M. Spiro and D. Vignaud, Phys. Lett. B 242, 297 (1990).
  7. J. N. Bahcall and P. I. Krastev, Phys. Rev. C 56, 2839 (1997).
  8. E. Lisi and D. Montanino, Phys. Rev. D 56, 1792 (1997).
  9. E. K. Akhmedov, Nucl. Phys. B538, 25 (1999).
  10. M. Maris and S. T. Petcov, Phys. Lett. B 457, 319 (1999).
  11. M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia, C. Pena-Garay, and A. Yu. Smirnov, Phys. Rev. D 63, 113004 (2001).
  12. G. L. Fogli, E. Lisi, A. Marrone, D. Montanino, and A. Palazzo, Phys. Rev. D 66, 053010 (2002).
  13. Lian-You Shan and Xin-Min Zhang, Phys. Rev. D 65, 113011 (2002).
  14. Super-Kamiokande Collaboration, M. B. Smy et al., Phys. Rev. D 69, 011104 (2004).
  15. A. S. Dighe and A. Yu. Smirnov, Phys. Rev. D 62, 033007 (2000).
  16. C. Lunardini and A. Yu. Smirnov, Nucl. Phys. B616, 307 (2001).
  17. V. D. Barger, D. Marfatia, K. Whisnant, and B. P. Wood, Phys. Rev. D 64, 073009 (2001).
  18. K. Takahashi and K. Sato, Phys. Rev. D 66, 033006 (2002).
  19. A. S. Dighe, M. T. Keil, and G. G. Raffelt, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 06 (2003) 006.
  20. A. N. Ioannisian and A. Yu. Smirnov, hep-ph/0201012.
  21. M. Lindner, T. Ohlsson, R. Tomas, and W. Winter, Astropart. Phys. 19, 755 (2003).
  22. A. S. Dighe, M. Kachelriess, G. G. Raffelt, and R. Tomas, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 01 (2004) 004.
  23. M. Blennow, T. Ohlsson, and H. Snellman, Phys. Rev. D 69, 073006 (2004).
  24. A. N. Ioannisian and A. Y. Smirnov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 241801 (2004).
  25. P. C. de Holanda, Wei Liao, and A. Yu. Smirnov, Nucl. Phys. B702, 307 (2004).
  26. E. K. Akhmedov, M. A. Tortola and J. W. F. Valle, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2004) 057. In the original version of the paper, the correct oscillation phase has been introduced on the “heuristic” ground. Its derivation is given in a later journal version.
  27. This result may be obtained via ordinary perturbation theory with the Hamiltonian H(x)=diag(0,Δ)+Udiag[V(x),0]U=H0+Υ, where H0 is the diagonalized Hamiltonian (MSW solution) at point (x). We stress that only that separation of the Hamiltonian into a nonperturbative (H0) and a perturbative (Υ) part leads to results where terms proportional to the full distance traveled by neutrinos in matter are absent; this is, in fact, guaranteed by the existence of the MSW solution.

  28. It is important to recall that ϵ enters both through V and through the adiabatic phase ϕm.

  29. Even more general would be an expansion around a suitable potential for which there is a closed analytic form.

  30. When VΔsΔa, then ΔamΔa+O(V) and ΔsmΔs[cos2θ(Vc132/Δs)]2+sin22θ+O[s132(V2/Δa)].

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation