- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine
Access Provided by Xinjiang University

Physical Review D

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Evolution of cosmic magnetic fields: From the very early Universe, to recombination, to the present

Robi Banerjee1 and Karsten Jedamzik2

  • 1Department of Physics and Astronomy, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada L8S 4M1
  • 2Laboratoire de Physique Mathémathique et Théorique, Université de Montpellier II, 34095 Montpellier Cedex 5, France

PDF

Phys. Rev. D 70, 123003 – Published 6 December, 2004

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.70.123003

Abstract

A detailed numerical and analytical examination of the evolution of stochastic magnetic fields between a putative magnetogenesis era at high cosmic temperatures T∼100   MeV–100   GeV and the present epoch is presented. The analysis includes all relevant dissipation processes, such as neutrino- and photon-induced fluid viscosities as well as ambipolar and hydrogen diffusion. A simple and intuitive analytical model matching the results of the three-dimensional MHD simulations allows for the prediction of prerecombination and present day magnetic field correlation lengths and energy densities as a function of initial magnetic field energy density, helicity, and spectral index. Our conclusions are multifold. (a) Initial primordial fields with only a small amount of helicity are evolving into maximally helical fields at the present. Furthermore, the simulations show a self-similarity in the evolution of maximally helical fields implying a seemingly acausual amplification of magnetic fields on large scales is observed. (b) There exists a correlation between the strength of the magnetic field B at the peak of its spectrum and the location of the peak, given at the present epoch by B≈5×10−12   G(L/kpc), where L is the magnetic field correlation length determined by the initial properties of the magnetic field. (c) Concerning studies of the generation of cosmic microwave background (CMBR) anisotropies due to primordial magnetic fields of B∼10−9   G on ≳10   Mpc scales, such fields are not only impossible to generate in early causal magnetogenesis scenarios but also seemingly ruled out by distortions of the CMBR spectrum due to magnetic field dissipation on smaller scales and the overproduction of cluster-magnetic fields. (d) The most promising detection possibility of CMBR distortions due to primordial magnetic fields may be on much smaller scales at higher multipoles l∼106 where the signal is predicted to be the strongest. (e) It seems possible that magnetic fields in clusters of galaxies are entirely of primordial origin, without invoking dynamo amplification. Such fields would be of (precollapse) strength 10−12–10−11   G with correlation lengths in the kpc range and would also exist in voids of galaxies.

View figure in article

Article Text

References (65)

  1. R. Beck, A. Brandenburg, D. Moss, A. Shukurov, and D. Sokoloff, Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 34, 155 (1996).
  2. P. Blasi, S. Burles, and A. V. Olinto, Astrophys. J. 514, L79 (1999).
  3. R. M. Kulsrud, R. Cen, J. P. Ostriker, and D. Ryu, Astrophys. J. 480, 481 (1997).
  4. M. J. Rees, Quart. J. Roy. Astron. Soc. 28, 197 (1987).
  5. S. Furlanetto and A. Loeb, Astrophys. J. 556, 619 (2001).
  6. D. Grasso and H.  R. Rubinstein, Phys. Rep. 348, 163 (2001).
  7. M. Giovannini, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 13, 391 (2004).
  8. M. Lemoine, G. Sigl, A. V. Olinto, and D. N. Schramm, Astrophys. J. 486, L115 (1997).
  9. G. Sigl and M. Lemoine, Astropart. Phys. 9, 65 (1998); G. Bertone, C. Isola, M. Lemoine, and G. Sigl, Phys. Rev. D 66, 103003 (2002).
  10. R. Plaga, Nature (London) 374, 430 (1995); A. Wingler, R. Plaga, and F. Krennrich, in Proceedings of the 26th International Cosmic Ray Conference (ICRC 99), Salt Lake City, Utah, 1999, edited by B. L. Dingus, D. B. Kieda, and M. H. Salamon, AIP Conf. Proc. No. 516 (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1999).
  11. K. Dimopoulos and A. C. Davis, Phys. Lett. B 390, 87 (1997).
  12. D. T. Son, Phys. Rev. D 59, 063008 (1999).
  13. K. Jedamzik, V. Katalinić, and A. V. Olinto, Phys. Rev. D 57, 3264 (1998).
  14. K. Subramanian and J. D. Barrow, Phys. Rev. D 58, 083502 (1998).

  15. In particular, magnetic fields are simply assumed frozen-in after the epoch of e± annihilation.

  16. A. Brandenburg, K. Enqvist, and P. Olesen, Phys. Rev. D 54, 1291 (1996).
  17. M. Christensson, M. Hindmarsh, and A. Brandenburg, Phys. Rev. E 64, 056405 (2001).
  18. J. M. Cornwall, Phys. Rev. D 56, 6146 (1997).
  19. P. Olesen, Phys. Lett. B 398, 321 (1997).
  20. G. B. Field and S. M. Carroll, Phys. Rev. D 62, 103008 (2000).
  21. T. Vachaspati, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 251302 (2001).
  22. G. Sigl, Phys. Rev. D 66, 123002 (2002).
  23. K. Subramanian and J. D. Barrow, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 3575 (1998).
  24. K. Subramanian and J. D. Barrow, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 335, L57 (2002).
  25. A. Mack, T. Kahniashvili, and A. Kosowsky Phys. Rev. D 65, 123004 (2002).
  26. K. Jedamzik, V. Katalinic, and A. V. Olinto Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 700 (2000).
  27. J. Stone and M. Norman, Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 80, 753 (1992).
  28. J. Stone and M. Norman, Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 80, 791 (1992).
  29. D. A. Clarke, R. A. Fiedler, and M. L. Norman, ZEUS3D User Manual (NCSA Technical Report No. 015, 1994), http://zeus.ncsa.uiuc.edu/lca_intro_zeus3d.html
  30. P. S. Iroshnikov, Sov. Astron. 7, 566 (1964).
  31. R. H. Kraichnan, Phys. Fluids 8, 1385 (1965).
  32. P. Goldreich and S. Sridhar, Astrophys. J. 438, 763 (1995); J. Cho, A. Lazarian, and E. Vishniac, Lect. Notes Phys. 614, 56 (2003).
  33. J. Maron and P. Goldreich, Astrophys. J. 554, 1175 (2001).
  34. W.-C. Müller and D. Biskamp, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 475 (2000).
  35. D. Biskamp, Nonlinear Magnetohydrodynamics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1993).
  36. C. J. Hogan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 51, 1488 (1983).
  37. P. G. Saffman, Phys. Fluids 10, 1349 (1967).
  38. M. Lesieur, Turbulence in Fluids (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1997).
  39. M. M. Mac Low, R. S. Klessen, A. Burkert, and M. D. Smith, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 2754 (1998).
  40. D. Biskamp and W.-C. Müller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 2195 (1999).
  41. E. G. Blackman, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 344, 707 (2003).
  42. A. Lazarian, E. T. Vishniac, and J. Cho, Astrophys. J. 603, 180 (2004).
  43. F. H. Shu, Astrophys. J. 273, 202 (1983).
  44. K. Subramanian, astro-ph/9708216.
  45. E. G. Zweibel, Astrophys. J. 567, 962 (2002).

  46. This is with the exception that for particularly chosen initial conditions, i.e., vi≠vn exponential damping of fluid flows on the integral scale may occur.

  47. This annihilation period reduces the number of e± by a large factor ∼1010 and is completed at T≈20   keV, where the number of positrons has fallen below the number of electrons.

  48. It may be instructive to point out, that, irrespective of initial magnetic spectra, magnetic field strength and coherence lengths are correlated, through Eq. (39). One may thus formulate statements in either of these quantities, with the other given by Eq. (39).

  49. This assumes that the gas is sufficiently hot after reionization such that ion viscosity is negligible.

  50. Note that this growth of the integral scale is associated with dissipation of magnetic fields into heat and therefore amounts into a small increase of the baryon temperature.

  51. We do not consider evolutionary effects due to cosmic structure formation in this paper.

  52. Note that Eq. (80) displays a weak spectral index dependence, i.e., 1/n on the RHS, and we have assumed n=3 in Eqs. (80) and (81).

  53. K. Dolag, M. Bartelmann, and H. Lesch, Astron. Astrophys. 348, 351 (1999); 387, 383 (2002).
  54. R. Banerjee and K. Jedamzik, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 251301 (2003).
  55. J. D. Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1975).
  56. S. Weinberg, Gravitation and Cosmology (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1972).
  57. K. Enqvist, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 7, 331 (1998).
  58. A. Kercek, K. Jedamzik, T. Abel, and M.-M. Mac Low (unpublished).
  59. K. Jedamzik and G. M. Fuller, Astrophys. J. 423, 33 (1994).
  60. P. J. E. Peebles, Astrophys. J. 142, 1317 (1965).
  61. J. Ahonen and K. Enqvist, Phys. Lett. B 382, 40 (1996).
  62. B. T. Draine, W. G. Roberge, and A. Dalgarno, Astrophys. J. 264, 485 (1983).

  63. Elastic atomic scattering cross sections usually increase slightly with decreasing temperature.

  64. F. H. Shu, The Physical Universe: An Introduction to Astronomy (University Science Books, Mill Valley, CA, 1982).
  65. Information and the code to download are available from the Laboratory for Computational Astrophysics (LCA) at http://zeus.ncsa.uiuc.edu/lca_intro_zeus3d.html

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. D 70, 123003– Published 6 December, 2004
  • Received 24 August 2004

© 2004 American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation