Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Electrodynamics of Spin-0 Mesons at Small Distances

M. P. Fry*

  • Naval Ordnance Laboratory, Silver Spring, Maryland 20910

  • *U. S. National Research Council Postdoctoral Resident Research Associate.

Phys. Rev. D 7, 423 – Published 15 January, 1973

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.7.423

Abstract

It is shown that if Z3 (where Z3 is the photon wave-function renormalization constant) is assumed finite and the nonasymptotic part h of the renormalized photon propagator vanishes with power-law behavior, then all the remaining renormalization constants in scalar electrodynamics can be made finite order by order, except the charged-meson self-mass δm2. The condition that δm2 be finite forces the asymptotic coupling α0 to satisfy at least one eigenvalue equation. A second eigenvalue condition for α0 emerges from the requirement that the theory have a Hermitian Lagrangian. Finally, on the basis of the renormalization group, we expect that the initial assumption of a finite value of Z3 is self-consistent only if α0 satisfies a third eigenvalue condition. Hence, we conjecture that a completely finite, closed theory of scalar electrodynamics is probably internally inconsistent. Assuming that h falls off sufficiently rapidly, we are able to show that the meson propagator has a very simple asymptotic form for momenta much greater than its physical mass.

References (31)

  1. K. Johnson, M. Baker, and R. Willey, Phys. Rev. 136, B1111 (1964) K. Johnson, R. Willey, and M. Baker, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 52, 318 (1967) [Sov. Phys. JETP 25, 205 (1967)] K. JohnsonR. WilleyM. BakerPhys. Rev. 163, 1699 (1967) M. Baker and K. Johnson, ibid. 183, 1292 (1969) Phys. Rev. D 3, 2516 (1971) ibid.3, 2541 (1971)
  2. S. Adler [Phys. Rev. D 5, 3021 (1972)]
  3. A. Salam, Phys. Rev. 86, 731 (1952)
  4. P. T. Matthews and A. Salam, Phys. Rev. 94, 185 (1954)
  5. E. Poggio [Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1971 (unpublished)]
  6. G. Backenstoss, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Sci. 20, 467 (1970)
  7. M. Gell-Mann and F. E. Low, Phys. Rev. 95, 1300 (1954)
  8. S. Adler, Phys. Rev. D 5, 3021 (1972)
  9. K. Johnson, R. Willey, and M. Baker, Phys. Rev. 163, 1699 (1967)
  10. M. Baker and K. Johnson, Phys. Rev. 183, 1292 (1969) Phys. Rev. D 3, 2541 (1971)
  11. Adler's [8]
  12. Adler's [8]
  13. K. Johnson, M. Baker, and R. Willey, Phys. Rev. Letters 11, 518 (1963)
  14. D. Flamm and P. G. O. Freund, Nuovo Cimento 32, 486 (1964)
  15. J. Schwinger, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. 37, 452 (1951) Phys. Rev. 91, 713 (1953)
  16. Omitted endnote

  17. Gell-Mann and Low, [7]
  18. Omitted endnote

  19. Ich-Joh Kim and C. R. Hagen, Phys. Rev. D 2, 1511 (1970)
  20. Omitted endnote

  21. Omitted endnote

  22. S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. 118, 838 (1960)
  23. Omitted endnote

  24. A. Salam and R. Delbourgo, Phys. Rev. 135, B1398 (1964)
  25. P. T. Matthews, Phil. Mag. 41, 185 (1950)
  26. A. Bhattacharyya, Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1969 (unpublished)
  27. J. C. Ward, Proc. Phys. Soc. (London) A64, 54 (1951) Phys. Rev. 84, 897 (1951) T. T. Wu, ibid. 125, 1436 (1962)
  28. T. T. Wu, Phys. Rev. 125, 1436 (1962)
  29. Omitted endnote

  30. Omitted endnote

  31. Omitted endnote

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation