- Access by Xinjiang University
Coincident brane nucleation and the neutralization of
Phys. Rev. D 69, 083510 – Published 12 April, 2004
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.69.083510
Abstract
Nucleation of branes by a four-form field has recently been considered in string motivated scenarios for the neutralization of the cosmological constant. An interesting question in this context is whether the nucleation of stacks of coincident branes is possible, and if so, at what rate does it proceed. Feng et al. have suggested that, at high ambient de Sitter temperature, the rate may be strongly enhanced, due to large degeneracy factors associated with the number of light species living on the worldsheet. This might facilitate the quick relaxation from a large effective cosmological constant down to the observed value. Here, we analyze this possibility in some detail. In four dimensions, and after the moduli are stabilized, branes interact via repulsive long range forces. Because of that, the Coleman–de Luccia (CdL) instanton for coincident brane nucleation may not exist, unless there is some short range interaction that keeps the branes together. If the CdL instanton exists, we find that the degeneracy factor depends only mildly on the ambient de Sitter temperature, and does not switch off even in the case of tunneling from flat space. This would result in catastrophic decay of the present vacuum. If, on the contrary, the CdL instanton does not exist, coincident brane nucleation may still proceed through a “static” instanton, representing pair creation of critical bubbles—a process somewhat analogous to thermal activation in flat space. In that case, the branes may stick together due to thermal symmetry restoration, and the pair creation rate depends exponentially on the ambient de Sitter temperature, switching off sharply as the temperature approaches zero. Such a static instanton may be well suited for the “saltatory” relaxation scenario proposed by Feng et al.
References (32)
- J.D. Brown and C. Teitelboim, Phys. Lett. B 195, 177 (1987); Nucl. Phys. 297, 787 (1988).
- J.L. Feng, J. March-Russell, S. Sethi, and F. Wilczek, Nucl. Phys. B602, 307 (2001).
- S. Coleman and F. De Luccia, Phys. Rev. D 21, 3305 (1980).
- J. Garriga and A. Vilenkin, Phys. Rev. D 64, 023517 (2001).
- S. Coleman, Phys. Rev. D 15, 2929 (1977).
- G. Dvali and A. Vilenkin, Phys. Rev. D 67, 046002 (2003).
- G. Dvali and A. Vilenkin, hep-th/0304043.
- H. Martel, P.R. Shapiro, and S. Weinberg, Astrophys. J. 492, 29 (1998).
- J. Garriga and A. Vilenkin, Phys. Rev. D 67, 043503 (2003).
- J. Garriga, M. Livio, and A. Vilenkin, Phys. Rev. D 61, 023503 (2000).
- R. Bousso and J. Polchinski, J. High Energy Phys. 06, 006 (2000).
- A. Vilenkin, Phys. Rev. D 23, 852 (1981).
- C.V. Johnson, D-Branes (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2003).
- W. Israel, Nuovo Cimento B 44, 1 (1966); ibid.48, 463(E) (1967).
- J.J. Halliwell, Phys. Lett. B 185, 341 (1987).
- S. Kachru, R. Kallosh, A. Linde, and S.P. Trivedi, Phys. Rev. D 68, 046005 (2003); S. Kachru, R. Kallosh, A. Linde, J. Maldacena, L. McAllister, and S.P. Trivedi, Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 10, 013 (2003).
- S.B. Giddings, Phys. Rev. D 68, 026006 (2003).
- J.M. Maldacena and C. Nunez, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 16, 822 (2001).
- P. Candelas and S. Weinberg, Nucl. Phys. B237, 397 (1984).
- N. Kaloper, J. March-Russell, G.D. Starkman, and M. Trodden, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 928 (2000).
- Y.P. Goncharov and A.A. Bytsenko, Class. Quantum Grav. 8, L211 (1991); D. Muller, H.V. Fagundes, and R. Opher, Phys. Rev. D 66, 083507 (2002).
- R. Basu, A. Guth, and A. Vilenkin, Phys. Rev. D 44, 340 (1991).
- J. Garriga, Phys. Rev. D 49, 6327 (1994).
- J. Garriga and A. Megevand, in preparation.
- J. Garriga and A. Vilenkin, Phys. Rev. D 44, 1007 (1991); ibid.45, 3469 (1992); ibid.J. Guven, 48, 4604 (1993).
- T. Vachaspati and A. Vilenkin, Phys. Rev. D 43, 3846(1991).
- X. Montes, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 38, 3091 (1999).
- V.A. Berezin, V.A. Kuzmin, and I.I. Tkachev, Phys. Scr., T 36, 269 (1991).
- D.A. Samuel and W.A. Hiscock, Phys. Rev. D 44, 3052 (1991).
- P. Ginsparg and M.J. Perry, Nucl. Phys. B222, 245 (1983).
- H. Nariai, Sci. Rep. Tohoku Univ., Ser. 1 35, 62 (1951).
- A.D. Linde, Nucl. Phys. B216, 421 (1983); ibid.B223, 544(E) (1983).