Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Gauge problem in the gravitational self-force: Harmonic gauge approach in the Schwarzschild background

Norichika Sago

Hiroyuki Nakano and Misao Sasaki

  • Department of Earth and Space Science, Graduate School of Science, Osaka University, Toyonaka, Osaka 560-0043, Japan
  • Department of Physics, Graduate School of Science, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan

  • Department of Earth and Space Science, Graduate School of Science, Osaka University, Toyonaka, Osaka 560-0043, Japan

Phys. Rev. D 67, 104017 – Published 22 May, 2003

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.67.104017

Abstract

The metric perturbation induced by a particle in the Schwarzschild background is usually calculated in the Regge-Wheeler (RW) gauge, whereas the gravitational self-force is known to be given by the tail part of the metric perturbation in the harmonic gauge. Thus, to identify the gravitational self-force correctly in a specified gauge, it is necessary to find out a gauge transformation that connects these two gauges. This is called the gauge problem. As a direct approach to solve the gauge problem, we formulate a method to calculate the metric perturbation in the harmonic gauge on the Schwarzschild background. We apply the Fourier-harmonic expansion to the metric perturbation and reduce the problem to the gauge transformation of the Fourier-harmonic coefficients (radial functions) from the RW gauge to the harmonic gauge. We derive a set of decoupled radial equations for the gauge transformation. These equations are found to have a simple second-order form for the odd parity part and the forms of spin s=0 and 1 Teukolsky equations for the even parity part. As a by-product, we correct typographical errors in Zerilli’s paper and present a set of corrected equations in Appendix A.

References (18)

  1. Y. Mino, M. Sasaki, and T. Tanaka, Phys. Rev. D 55, 3457 (1997).
  2. T.C. Quinn and R.M. Wald, Phys. Rev. D 60, 064009 (1999).
  3. S. Detweiler and B.F. Whiting, Phys. Rev. D 67, 024025 (2003).
  4. P.L. Chrzanowski, Phys. Rev. D 11, 2042 (1975).
  5. T. Regge and J.A. Wheeler, Phys. Rev. 108, 1063 (1957).
  6. F.J. Zerilli, Phys. Rev. D 2, 2141 (1970).
  7. S.A. Teukolsky, Astrophys. J. 185, 635 (1973).
  8. L. Barack and A. Ori, Phys. Rev. D 61, 061502(R) (2000); ibid.L. Barack, 62, 084027 (2000).
  9. Y. Mino, H. Nakano, and M. Sasaki, Prog. Theor. Phys. 108, 1039 (2003).
  10. L. Barack, Y. Mino, H. Nakano, A. Ori, and M. Sasaki, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 091101 (2002).
  11. L. Barack and A. Ori, Phys. Rev. D 66, 084022 (2002).
  12. L. Barack and A. Ori, Phys. Rev. D 64, 124003 (2001).
  13. L. Barack and C.O. Lousto, Phys. Rev. D 66, 061502(R) (2002).
  14. S. Mano, H. Suzuki, and E. Takasugi, Prog. Theor. Phys. 95, 1079 (1996); ibid.96, 549 (1996).
  15. Y. Mino, talk given at the 5th Capra Ranch meeting, http://cgwp.gravity.psu.edu/events/Capra5/slides/mino.ppt
  16. H. Nakano, N. Sago, and M. Sasaki (in preparation).
  17. S. Chandrasekhar, Proc. R. Soc. London A343, 289 (1975); Mathematical Theory of Black Holes (Oxford University Press, New York, 1983); M. Sasaki and T. Nakamura, Phys. Lett. 89A, 68 (1982).
  18. Furthermore, the gravitational self-force is, because of the equivalence principle, a gauge-variant notion. To give a genuinely physical meaning to it, one must solve the second order metric perturbation completely. This is, however, beyond the scope of the present paper.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation