Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Quantum fluctuations in brane-world inflation without an inflaton on the brane

Norichika Sago, Yoshiaki Himemoto, and Misao Sasaki

  • Department of Earth and Space Science, Graduate School of Science, Osaka University, Toyonaka 560-0043, Japan

Phys. Rev. D 65, 024014 – Published 21 December, 2001

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.65.024014

Abstract

A Randall-Sundrum-type brane-cosmological model in which slow-roll inflation on the brane is driven solely by a bulk scalar field was recently proposed by Himemoto and Sasaki. We analyze their model in detail and calculate the quantum fluctuations of the bulk scalar field φ with m2=V(φ). We decompose the bulk scalar field into the infinite mass spectrum of four-dimensional fields; the field with the smallest mass square, called the zero mode, and the Kaluza-Klein modes above it with a mass gap. We find the zero-mode dominance of the classical solution holds if |m2|l¯21, where l¯ is the curvature radius of the effectively anti–de Sitter bulk, but it is violated if |m2|l¯21, though the violation is very small. Then we evaluate the vacuum expectation value δφ2 on the brane. We find the zero-mode contribution completely dominates if |m2|l¯21, similar to the case of classical background. In contrast, we find the Kaluza-Klein contribution is small but non-negligible if the value of |m2|l¯2 is large.

References (39)

  1. P. Horava and E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B460, 506 (1996).
  2. P. Horava and E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B475, 94 (1996).
  3. N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dimopoulos, and G. Dvali, Phys. Lett. B 429, 263 (1998); I. Antoniadis, N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dimopoulos, and G. Dvali, 436, 257 (1998).
  4. L. Randall and R. Sundrum, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 3370 (1999).
  5. L. Randall and R. Sundrum, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 4690 (1999).
  6. J. Garriga and T. Tanaka, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 2778 (2000).
  7. C. Charmousis, R. Gregory, and V.A. Rubakov, Phys. Rev. D 62, 067505 (2000).
  8. T. Tanaka and X. Montes, Nucl. Phys. B582, 259 (2000).
  9. T. Shiromizu, K. Maeda, and M. Sasaki, Phys. Rev. D 62, 024012 (2000).
  10. S. Mukohyama, Phys. Lett. B 473, 241 (2000).
  11. P. Kraus, J. High Energy Phys. 12, 011 (1999).
  12. J. Garriga and M. Sasaki, Phys. Rev. D 62, 043523 (2000).
  13. D. Ida, J. High Energy Phys. 09, 014 (2000).
  14. H. Kim, J.H. Yee, and M. Park, hep-th/0006164.
  15. C. van de Bruck, M. Dorca, C.J. Martins, and M. Parry, Phys. Lett. B 495, 183 (2000).
  16. R. Maartens, Phys. Rev. D 62, 084023 (2000).
  17. H. Kodama, A. Ishibashi, and O. Seto, Phys. Rev. D 62, 064022 (2000).
  18. D. Langlois, Phys. Rev. D 62, 126012 (2000).
  19. C. van de Bruck, M. Dorca, R.H. Brandenberger, and A. Lukas, Phys. Rev. D 62, 123515 (2000).
  20. K. Koyama and J. Soda, Phys. Rev. D 62, 123502 (2000).
  21. L. Anchordoqui, C. Nunez, and K. Olsen, J. High Energy Phys. 10, 050 (2000); L. Anchordoqui and K. Olsen, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 16, 1157 (2001).
  22. H.A. Chamblin and H.S. Reall, Nucl. Phys. B562, 133 (1999).
  23. N. Kaloper, Phys. Rev. D 60, 123506 (1999).
  24. T. Nihei, Phys. Lett. B 465, 81 (1999).
  25. H.B. Kim and H.D. Kim, Phys. Rev. D 61, 064003 (2000).
  26. S.W. Hawking, T. Hertog, and H.S. Reall, Phys. Rev. D 62, 043501 (2000).
  27. S. Nojiri and S.D. Odintsov, Phys. Lett. B 484, 119 (2000); S. Nojiri, S.D. Odintsov, and S. Zerbini, Phys. Rev. D 62, 064006 (2000); S. Nojiri, O. Obregon, and S.D. Odintsov, 62, 104003 (2000).
  28. R. Maartens, D. Wands, B.A. Bassett, and I. Heard, Phys. Rev. D 62, 041301 (2000).
  29. D. Langlois, R. Maartens, M. Sasaki, and D. Wands, Phys. Rev. D 63, 084009 (2001).
  30. U. Gen and M. Sasaki, gr-qc/0011078.
  31. D. Langlois, R. Maartens, and D. Wands, Phys. Lett. B 489, 259 (2000).
  32. J. Yokoyama and Y. Himemoto, Phys. Rev. D 64, 083511 (2001).
  33. S. Kobayashi, K. Koyama, and J. Soda, Phys. Lett. B 501, 157 (2001).
  34. P.B. Gilkey, K. Kirsten, and D.V. Vassilevich, Nucl. Phys. B601, 125 (2001).
  35. Y. Himemoto and M. Sasaki, Phys. Rev. D 63, 044015 (2001).
  36. It is possible to introduce a coupling between φ and the matter field on the brane. However, we do not consider such a case in the present paper.
  37. T. Tanaka, Y. Himemoto, and M. Sasaki (unpublished).
  38. The separation constant λγ2 in [35] corresponds to λ2 here.
  39. H. Bateman, Higher Transcendental Functions I (Krieger, Florida, 1981), reprint edition.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation