- Access by Xinjiang University
Particle definition in the presence of black holes
Phys. Rev. D 63, 024014 – Published 22 December, 2000
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.63.024014
Abstract
A canonical particle definition via the diagonalization of the Hamiltonian for a quantum field theory in specific curved space-times is presented. Within the provided approach radial ingoing or outgoing Minkowski particles do not exist. An application of this formalism to the Rindler metric recovers the well-known Unruh effect. For the situation of a black hole the Hamiltonian splits up into two independent parts accounting for the interior and the exterior domain, respectively. It turns out that a reasonable particle definition may be accomplished for the outside region only. The Hamiltonian of the field inside the black hole is unbounded from above and below and hence possesses no ground state. The corresponding equation of motion displays a linear global instability. Possible consequences of this instability are discussed and its relations to the sonic analogues of black holes are addressed.
References (50)
- S.A. Fulling, Phys. Rev. D 7, 2850 (1973).
- S.W. Hawking, Nature (London) 248, 30 (1974); Commun. Math. Phys. 43, 199 (1975).
- P.C.W. Davies, J. Phys. A 8, 609 (1975).
- W.G. Unruh, Phys. Rev. D 14, 870 (1976).
- D.G. Boulware, Phys. Rev. D 11, 1404 (1975).
- R.M. Wald, Commun. Math. Phys. 45, 9 (1975).
- A. Ashtekar and A. Magnon, Proc. R. Soc. London 346, 375 (1975).
- J.B. Hartle and S.W. Hawking, Phys. Rev. D 13, 2188 (1976).
- W. Israel, Phys. Lett. 57A, 107 (1976).
- R.M. Wald, Commun. Math. Phys. 54, 1 (1977).
- S.A. Fulling, M. Sweeny, and R.M. Wald, Commun. Math. Phys. 63, 257 (1978).
- W.G. Unruh, Phys. Rev. Lett. 46, 1351 (1981).
- R. Haag, H. Narnhofer, and U. Stein, Commun. Math. Phys. 94, 219 (1984).
- B.S. Kay, Commun. Math. Phys. 62, 55 (1978); ibid.100, 57 (1985).
- J. Dimock and B.S. Kay, J. Math. Phys. 27, 2520 (1986); Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 175, 366 (1987).
- K. Fredenhagen and R. Haag, Commun. Math. Phys. 127, 273 (1990).
- B.S. Kay and R.M. Wald, Phys. Rep. 207, 49 (1991).
- R. Brout, S. Massar, R. Parentani, and Ph. Spindel, Phys. Rep. 260, 329 (1995).
- S. Deser and O. Levin, Phys. Rev. D 59, 064004 (1999).
- M. Visser, Class. Quantum Grav. 15, 1767 (1998).
- I.B. Khriplovich, Zh. Éksp. Teor. Fiz. 115, 1539 (1999) [JETP 89, 830 (1999)]; Phys. Rep. 320, 37 (1999).
- S. Liberati, S. Sonego, and M. Visser, Class. Quantum Grav. 17, 2903 (2000).
- R. Verch, Commun. Math. Phys. 160, 507 (1994); H. Sahlmann and R. Verch, e-print: math-ph/0002021.
- N.D. Birrell and P.C.W. Davies, Quantum Fields in Curved Space (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1982).
- S.A. Fulling, Aspects of Quantum Field Theory in Curved Space-Time (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1989).
- R.M. Wald, Quantum Field Theory in Curved Spacetime and Black Hole Thermodynamics (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1994).
- Matt Visser, Lorentzian Wormholes: From Einstein to Hawking (AIP Press, Woodbury, NY, 1995).
- P.K. Townsend, “Black Holes,” Lecture notes, DAMPT, University of Cambridge, e-print:gr-qc/9707012.
- L.H. Ford, in the proceedings of the 9th Jorge Andre Swieca Summer School: Particles and Fields, Sao Paulo, Brazil, 1997; in Campos do Jordao 1997, Particles and Fields, pp. 345–388; L.H. Ford, e-print: gr-qc/9707062.
- M. Bordag, Quantum Field Theory Under the Influence of External Conditions (Teubner, Stuttgart, 1996); The Casimir Effect 50 Years Later (World Scientific, Singapore, 1999).
- A. Wipf, in Black Holes: Theory and Observation, edited by F. Hehl, C. Kiefer, and R. Metzler (Springer, Berlin, 1998), e-print: hep-th/9801025.
- M. Henneaux and C. Teitelboim, Quantization of Gauge Systems (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1992).
- S.W. Hawking and G.F.R. Ellis, The Large Scale Structure of Space-time (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1973).
- M. Reed and B. Simon, Methods of Modern Mathematical Physics (Academic, New York, 1979), Vols. I–IV.
- J. Weidmann, Linear Operators in Hilbert Spaces (Springer, New York, 1980).
- M. Abramowitz and I. Stegun, Handbook of Mathematical Functions (Dover, New York, 1965).
- R. Kubo, Phys. Soc. Jap. 12, 570 (1957).
- P.C. Martin and J. Schwinger, Phys. Rev. 115, 1342 (1959).
- Y. Takahashi and H. Umezawa, Collect. Phenom. 2, 55 (1975); Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 10, 1755 (1996); H. Umezawa, Advanced Field Theory (AIP Press, New York, 1993).
- B.S. DeWitt and R.W. Brehme, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 9, 220 (1960); J. Hadamard, Lectures on Chauchy’s Problem in Linear Partial Differential Equations (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT, 1923).
- A.S. Wightman, Phys. Rev. 101, 860 (1956).
- K. Fredenhagen (private communication).
- B. Schroer and J.A. Swieca, Phys. Rev. D 2, 2938 (1970).
- S.A. Fulling, Phys. Rev. D 42, 4248 (1990).
- P. Painlevé, C. R. Hebd. Seances Acad. Sci. 173, 677 (1921).
- A. Gullstrand, Ark. Mat., Astron. Fys. 16, 1 (1922).
- G. Lemaître, Ann. Soc. Sci. (Bruxelles) 53, 51 (1933).
- L.M. Burko, Phys. Rev. D 58, 084013 (1998).
- L.D. Landau and E.M. Lifschitz, Fluid Mechanics, Course of Theoretical Physics Vol. 6 (Pergamon, London, 1959).
- R. Schützhold, G. Plunien, and G. Soff, Phys. Rev. A 58, 1783 (1998).