- Access by Xinjiang University
Fermion masses and gauge mediated supersymmetry breaking from a single U(1)
Phys. Rev. D 60, 055003 – Published 29 July, 1999
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.60.055003
Abstract
We present a supersymmetric model of flavor. A single U(1) gauge group is responsible for both generating the flavor spectrum and communicating supersymmetry breaking to the visible sector. The problem of flavor changing neutral currents is overcome, in part using an “effective supersymmetry” spectrum among the squarks, with the first two generations very heavy. All masses are generated dynamically and the theory is completely renormalizable. The model contains a simple Froggatt-Nielsen sector and communicates supersymmetry breaking via gauge mediation without requiring a separate messenger sector. By forcing the theory to be consistent with SU(5) grand unification, the model predicts a large and a massless up quark. While respecting the experimental bounds on CP violation in the K system, the model leads to a large enhancement of CP violation in mixing as well as in B decay amplitudes.
References (25)
- G. ’t Hooft, in Recent Developments in Gauge Theories, edited by G. ’t Hooft et al. (Plenum Press, New York, 1980).
- For a review, see F. Gabbiani, E. Gabrielli, A. Masiero, and L. Silvestrini Nucl. Phys. B477, 321 (1996).
- M. Dine and W. Fischler, Phys. Lett. 110B, 227 (1982); Nucl. Phys. B204, 346 (1982); ibid.L. Alvarez-Gaumé, M. Claudson, and M. Wise, B207, 96 (1982); C.R. Nappi and B.A. Ovrut, Phys. Lett. 113B, 175 (1982); S. Dimopoulos and S. Raby, Nucl. Phys. B219, 479 (1983).
- M. Dine, A.E. Nelson, and Y. Shirman, Phys. Rev. D 51, 1362 (1995).
- M. Dine, A.E. Nelson, Y. Nir, and Y. Shirman, Phys. Rev. D 53, 2658 (1996).
- For a complete review, see G.F. Giudice and R. Rattazzi, “Theories with Gauge Mediated Supersymmetry Breaking,” hep-ph/9801271, and references within.
- C.D. Froggatt and H.B. Nielsen, Nucl. Phys. B147, 277 (1979).
- N. Arkani-Hamed, C.D. Carone, L.J. Hall, and H. Murayama, Phys. Rev. D 54, 7032 (1996).
- G. Dvali and A. Pomarol, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3728 (1996).
- A.G. Cohen, D.B. Kaplan, and A.E. Nelson, Phys. Lett. B 412, 301 (1997).
- P. Binétruy and E.A. Dudas, Phys. Lett. B 389, 503 (1996); M. Green and J. Schwarz, Phys. Lett. 149B, 117 (1984); L.E. Ibáñez and G.G. Ross, Phys. Lett. B 332, 100 (1994).
- I. Affleck, M. Dine, and N. Seiberg, Nucl. Phys. B256, 557 (1985).
- For a recent review see E. Poppitz and S.P. Trivedi, hep-th/9803107.
- S. Dimopoulos, Phys. Lett. 129B, 417 (1983).
- P. Fayet and J. Iliopoulos, Phys. Lett. 51B, 461 (1974).
- E. Poppitz and S.P. Trivedi, Phys. Lett. B 401, 38 (1997).
- H. Georgi and I.N. McArthur, Harvard University Report No. HUTP-81/A011, 1981; D.B. Kaplan and A.V. Manohar, Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 2004 (1986); ibid.K. Choi, C.W. Kim, and W.K. Sze, 61, 794 (1988).
- Y. Nir and N. Seiberg, Phys. Lett. B 309, 337 (1993).
- A.G. Cohen, D.B. Kaplan, F. Lepeintre, and A.E. Nelson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 2300 (1997).
- T. Gherghetta, A. Riotto, and Leszek Roszkowski, Phys. Lett. B 440, 287 (1998).
- A. Riotto, Phys. Lett. B 413, 22 (1997).
- R. Brandenberger and A. Riotto, Phys. Lett. B 445, 323 (1999).
- G. Dvali, G.F. Giudice, and A. Pomarol, Nucl. Phys. B478, 31 (1996).
- G. Kribs and D.E. Kaplan, hep-ph/9906341.
- H.P. Nilles and N. Polonsky, Phys. Lett. B 412, 69 (1997)