Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Strengths of singularities in spherical symmetry

Brien C. Nolan*

  • School of Mathematical Sciences, Dublin City University, Glasnevin, Dublin 9, Ireland

  • *Email address: nolanb@ccmail.dcu.ie

Phys. Rev. D 60, 024014 – Published 15 June, 1999

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.60.024014

Abstract

Covariant equations characterizing the strength of a singularity in spherical symmetry are derived and several models are investigated. The difference between central and non-central singularities is emphasized. A slight modification to the definition of singularity strength is suggested. The gravitational weakness of shell crossing singularities in collapsing spherical dust is proven for timelike geodesics, closing a gap in the proof.

References (24)

  1. R. Penrose, Phys. Rev. Lett. 14, 57 (1965).
  2. S. W. Hawking and G. F. R. Ellis, The Large Scale Structure of Space-Time (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1973).
  3. R. M. Wald, “Gravitational Collapse and Cosmic Censorship,” gr-qc/9710068.
  4. C. J. S. Clarke, Class. Quantum Grav. 10, 1375 (1993).
  5. F. J. Tipler, Phys. Lett. 64A, 8 (1977).
  6. P. S. Joshi, Global Aspects in Gravitation and Cosmology (Clarendon, Oxford, 1993).
  7. See several of the articles in Internal Structure of Black Holes and Spacetime Singularities, edited by L. M. Burko and A. Ori (IOP Publishing, Bristol, 1997), especially Chaps. 1 and 24.
  8. A. Papapetrou and A. Hamoui, Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré, Sect. A 9, 343 (1967).
  9. C. J. S. Clarke and N. O’Donnell, Rendiconti del seminario matematico (Universitá e Politecnico Torino)50, 39 (1992).
  10. C. J. S. Clarke and A. Krolak, J. Geom. Phys. 2, 127 (1985).
  11. R. P. A. C. Newman, Class. Quantum Grav. 3, 527 (1986).
  12. S. A. Hayward, Phys. Rev. D 53, 1938 (1996).
  13. C. M. Bender and S. A. Orszag, Advanced Mathematical Methods for Scientists and Engineers (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1978).
  14. M. S. P. Eastham, Math. Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc. 117, 175 (1995).
  15. M. D. Roberts, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 21, 907 (1989).
  16. A. Krasiński, Inhomogeneous Cosmological Models (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1997).
  17. P. R. Brady, Class. Quantum Grav. 11, 1255 (1994).
  18. P. Yodzis, H.-J. Seifert, and H. Muller zum Hagen, Commun. Math. Phys. 34, 135 (1973); ibid.37, 29 (1974).
  19. A. Ori, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 2117 (1992).
  20. See Ref. [7], p. 19.
  21. S. Hod and T. Piran, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 1554 (1998); Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 30, 1555 (1998). Note however that the graphs of the metric functions in these papers indicate that the gradients almost certainly do not diverge sufficiently rapidly to allow a strong singularity.
  22. L. M. Burko, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 4958 (1997).
  23. A. Ori, Phys. Rev. D 57, 4745 (1998). The functional form of the singularities studied here will almost certainly lead to their being weak.
  24. A. Krolak, J. Math. Phys. 28, 138 (1987).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation