Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Relativistic Treatment of Low-Energy Nucleon-Nucleon Scattering

R. A. Bryan

A. Gersten*

  • Department of Physics and Cyclotron Institute, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843

  • Department of Physics, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843
  • Institute of Theoretical Physics, University of Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

  • *Present address: Department of Physics, University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel.

Phys. Rev. D 6, 341 – Published 1 July, 1972Erratum Phys. Rev. D 7, 2802 (1973)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.6.341

Abstract

An improved version of the one-boson-exchange model is presented. In addition to π, ρ, ω, and X0, the scalar mesons ε and δ are used with their physical masses. The broad width of the ρ and ε mesons is taken into account. The relativistic Blankenbecler-Sugar equation is utilized over the laboratory scattering energy range 0 to 425 MeV. A better fit to the experimental NN data is obtained than in previous one-boson-exchange models. Reasonable values of the coupling constants are obtained, which agree qualitatively with other experiments. The fitting procedure was done including and excluding S waves in order to test the influence of the core region. An approximate version of the above model is developed using the Schrödinger equation in place of the Blankenbecler-Sugar equation. A good fit to the experimental scattering data and the deuteron parameters is obtained with coupling constants similar to those of the relativistic model.

Erratum

Relativistic Treatment of Low-Energy Nucleon-Nucleon Scattering

R. A. Bryan and A. Gersten
Phys. Rev. D 7, 2802 (1973)

References (19)

  1. A. Gersten, R. H. Thompson, and A. E. S. Green, Phys. Rev. D 3, 2076 (1971)
  2. R. A. Bryan and B. L. Scott, Phys. Rev. 177, 1435 (1969)
  3. Particle Data Group, Rev. Mod. Phys. 43, S1 (1971)
  4. R. Blankenbecler and R. Sugar, Phys. Rev. 142, 1051 (1966)
  5. R. H. Thompson, Phys. Rev. D 1, 110 (1970)
  6. R. H. Thompson, A. Gersten, and A. E. S. Green, Phys. Rev. D 3, 2069 (1971)
  7. J. Binstock and R. A. Bryan, Phys. Rev. D 4, 1341 (1971)
  8. S. R. Deans and W. G. Holladay, Phys. Rev. 165, 1886 (1968)
  9. M. H. MacGregor, R. A. Arndt, and R. M. Wright, Phys. Rev. 182, 1714 (1969)
  10. R. A. Arndt and M. H. MacGregor, Phys. Rev. 141, 873 (1966)
  11. R. E. Seamon, K. A. Friedman, G. Breit, R. D. Haracz, J. M. Holt, and A. Prakash, Phys. Rev. 165, 1579 (1968)
  12. A. Gersten and A. E. S. Green, Phys. Rev. 176, 1199 (1968)
  13. T. Ueda and A. E. S. Green, Phys. Rev. 174, 1304 (1968)
  14. P. Curry and J. W. Moffat, Phys. Rev. 184, 1885 (1969)
  15. G. J. Gounaris, Phys. Rev. 181, 2066 (1969)
  16. J. Schwinger, Phys. Rev. D 3, 1967 (1971)
  17. G. Ebel et al., in Springer Tracts in Modern Physics, edited by G. Höhler (Springer, Berlin, 1970), Vol. 55
  18. R. A. Bryan, Nucl. Phys. A146, 359 (1970)
  19. P. Signell and J. Holdeman, Jr., Phys. Rev. Letters 27, 1393 (1971)

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation