- Access by Xinjiang University
Canonical quasilocal energy and small spheres
Phys. Rev. D 59, 064028 – Published 18 February, 1999
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.59.064028
Abstract
Consider the definition of quasilocal energy stemming from the Hamilton-Jacobi method as applied to the canonical form of the gravitational action. We examine in the standard “small-sphere limit,” first considered by Horowitz and Schmidt in their examination of Hawking’s quasilocal mass. By the term small sphere we mean a cut level in an affine radius of the light cone belonging to a generic spacetime point As a power series in we compute the energy of the gravitational and matter fields on a spacelike hypersurface Σ spanning Much of our analysis concerns conceptual and technical issues associated with assigning the zero point of the energy. For the small-sphere limit, we argue that the correct zero point is obtained via a “light cone reference,” which stems from a certain isometric embedding of into a genuine light cone of Minkowski spacetime. Choosing this zero point, we find the following results: (i) in the presence of matter and (ii) in vacuo Here, is a unit, future-pointing, timelike vector in the tangent space at (which defines the choice of affine radius); is the matter stress-energy-momentum tensor; is the Bel-Robinson gravitational super stress-energy-momentum tensor; and denotes “restriction to ” Hawking’s quasilocal mass expression agrees with the results (i) and (ii) up to and including the first non-trivial order in the affine radius. The non-vacuum result (i) has the expected form based on the results of Newtonian potential theory.
References (19)
- See, for instance, J. W. York, Found. Phys. 16, 249 (1986).
- J. N. Goldberg, in General Relativity and Gravitation, edited by A. Held (Plenum, New York, 1980), Vol. 1.
- A. J. Dougan and L. J. Mason, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 2119 (1991).
- L. B. Szabados, Class. Quantum Grav. 11, 1833 (1994); ibid.11, 1847 (1994); ibid.13, 1661 (1996).
- C. Lanzcos, The Variational Principles of Mechanics (University of Toronto Press, Toronto, 1970).
- J. D. Brown and J. W. York, Phys. Rev. D 47, 1407 (1993).
- J. W. York, Phys. Rev. D 33, 2092 (1986); J. D. Brown, E. A. Martinez, and J. W. York, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 2281 (1991); J. D. Brown and J. W. York, Phys. Rev. D 47, 1420 (1993).
- J. D. Brown, S. R. Lau, and J. W. York, Phys. Rev. D 55, 1977 (1997).
- J. D. Brown, S. R. Lau, and J. W. York, “Boosted Quasilocal Energy in General Relativity” (in preparation).
- G. T. Horowitz and B. G. Schmidt, Proc. R. Soc. London A381, 215 (1982).
- R. M. Kelly, K. P. Tod, and N. M. J. Woodhouse, Class. Quantum Grav. 3, 1151 (1986).
- A. J. Dougan, Class. Quantum Grav. 9, 2461 (1992).
- H. Friedrich, Proc. R. Soc. London A375, 169 (1981).
- D. Christodoulou and S. Klainerman, The Global Nonlinear Stability of Minkowski Space (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1993).
- A. Anderson, Y. Choquet-Bruhat, and J. W. York, Top. Methods Nonlinear Analysis 10, 353(1997).
- J. W. York, in Gravitation and Geometry, edited by W. Rindler and A. Trautman (Bibliopolis, Naples, 1987).
- T. Newman and K. P. Tod, in General Relativity and Gravitation, edited by A. Held (Plenum, New York, 1980), Vol. 2.
- R. Penrose and W. Rindler, Spinors and Spacetime (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1985), Vol. 1.
- C. W. Misner, K. S. Thorne, and J. A. Wheeler, Gravitation (Freeman, San Francisco, 1973).