Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Canonical quasilocal energy and small spheres

J. D. Brown

S. R. Lau*

J. W. York

  • Department of Physics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695–8202
  • Department of Mathematics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695–8205

  • Department of Physics & Astronomy, University of North Carolina, CB# 3255 Phillips Hall, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599-3255
  • Institut für Theoretische Physik, Technische Universität Wien, Wiedner Hauptstraße 8-10, A-1040 Wien, Austria

  • Department of Physics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695–8202
  • Department of Physics & Astronomy, University of North Carolina, CB# 3255 Phillips Hall, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599-3255

  • *Current address: Applied Mathematics Group, Department of Mathematics, University of North Carolina, CB# 3250 Phillips Hall, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3250.

Phys. Rev. D 59, 064028 – Published 18 February, 1999

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.59.064028

Abstract

Consider the definition E of quasilocal energy stemming from the Hamilton-Jacobi method as applied to the canonical form of the gravitational action. We examine E in the standard “small-sphere limit,” first considered by Horowitz and Schmidt in their examination of Hawking’s quasilocal mass. By the term small sphere we mean a cut S(r), level in an affine radius r, of the light cone Np belonging to a generic spacetime point p. As a power series in r, we compute the energy E of the gravitational and matter fields on a spacelike hypersurface Σ spanning S(r). Much of our analysis concerns conceptual and technical issues associated with assigning the zero point of the energy. For the small-sphere limit, we argue that the correct zero point is obtained via a “light cone reference,” which stems from a certain isometric embedding of S(r) into a genuine light cone of Minkowski spacetime. Choosing this zero point, we find the following results: (i) in the presence of matter E=43πr3[Tμνuμuν]|p+O(r4) and (ii) in vacuo E=190r5[Tμνλκuμuνuλuκ]|p+O(r6). Here, uμ is a unit, future-pointing, timelike vector in the tangent space at p (which defines the choice of affine radius); Tμν is the matter stress-energy-momentum tensor; Tμνλκ is the Bel-Robinson gravitational super stress-energy-momentum tensor; and |p denotes “restriction to p.” Hawking’s quasilocal mass expression agrees with the results (i) and (ii) up to and including the first non-trivial order in the affine radius. The non-vacuum result (i) has the expected form based on the results of Newtonian potential theory.

References (19)

  1. See, for instance, J. W. York, Found. Phys. 16, 249 (1986).
  2. J. N. Goldberg, in General Relativity and Gravitation, edited by A. Held (Plenum, New York, 1980), Vol. 1.
  3. A. J. Dougan and L. J. Mason, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 2119 (1991).
  4. L. B. Szabados, Class. Quantum Grav. 11, 1833 (1994); ibid.11, 1847 (1994); ibid.13, 1661 (1996).
  5. C. Lanzcos, The Variational Principles of Mechanics (University of Toronto Press, Toronto, 1970).
  6. J. D. Brown and J. W. York, Phys. Rev. D 47, 1407 (1993).
  7. J. W. York, Phys. Rev. D 33, 2092 (1986); J. D. Brown, E. A. Martinez, and J. W. York, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 2281 (1991); J. D. Brown and J. W. York, Phys. Rev. D 47, 1420 (1993).
  8. J. D. Brown, S. R. Lau, and J. W. York, Phys. Rev. D 55, 1977 (1997).
  9. J. D. Brown, S. R. Lau, and J. W. York, “Boosted Quasilocal Energy in General Relativity” (in preparation).
  10. G. T. Horowitz and B. G. Schmidt, Proc. R. Soc. London A381, 215 (1982).
  11. R. M. Kelly, K. P. Tod, and N. M. J. Woodhouse, Class. Quantum Grav. 3, 1151 (1986).
  12. A. J. Dougan, Class. Quantum Grav. 9, 2461 (1992).
  13. H. Friedrich, Proc. R. Soc. London A375, 169 (1981).
  14. D. Christodoulou and S. Klainerman, The Global Nonlinear Stability of Minkowski Space (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1993).
  15. A. Anderson, Y. Choquet-Bruhat, and J. W. York, Top. Methods Nonlinear Analysis 10, 353(1997).
  16. J. W. York, in Gravitation and Geometry, edited by W. Rindler and A. Trautman (Bibliopolis, Naples, 1987).
  17. T. Newman and K. P. Tod, in General Relativity and Gravitation, edited by A. Held (Plenum, New York, 1980), Vol. 2.
  18. R. Penrose and W. Rindler, Spinors and Spacetime (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1985), Vol. 1.
  19. C. W. Misner, K. S. Thorne, and J. A. Wheeler, Gravitation (Freeman, San Francisco, 1973).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation