- Access by Xinjiang University
Big bang nucleosynthesis and active-sterile neutrino mixing: Evidence for maximal mixing in Super Kamiokande?
Phys. Rev. D 59, 063006 – Published 17 February, 1999
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.59.063006
Abstract
We discuss big bang nucleosynthesis constraints on maximal mixing. Vacuum oscillation has been proposed as one possible explanation of the Super Kamiokande atmospheric neutrino data. Based on the most recent primordial abundance measurements, we find that the effective number of neutrino species for big bang nucleosynthesis (BBN) is Assuming that all three active neutrinos are light (with masses ), we examine BBN constraints on mixing in two scenarios: (1) a negligible lepton asymmetry (the standard picture) and (2) the presence of a large lepton asymmetry which has resulted from an amplification by mixing being or another sterile neutrino species). The latter scenario has been proposed recently to reconcile the BBN constraints and large-angle mixing. We find that the large-angle mixing in the first scenario, which would yield is ruled out as an explanation of the Super Kamiokande data. It is conceivably possible for the solution to evade BBN bounds in the second scenario, but only if is satisfied, and if decays non-radiatively with a lifetime This mass-squared difference implies if is much lighter than We conclude that maximal (or near maximal) mixing is a more likely explanation of the Super Kamiokande data.
References (29)
- Y. Fukuda et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 1562 (1998).
- M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia, H. Nunokawa, O. L. G. Peres, T. Stanev, and J. W. F. Valle, Nucl. Phys. B (to be published).
- See, e.g., N. Hata and P. G. Langacker, Phys. Rev. D 56, 6107 (1997).
- R. Barbieri and A. Dolgov, Phys. Lett. B 349, 743 (1991).
- K. Enqvist, K. Kainulainen, and M. Thomson, Nucl. Phys. B373, 498 (1992).
- J. M. Cline, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 3137 (1992).
- X. Shi, D. N. Schramm, and B. D. Fields, Phys. Rev. D 48, 2563 (1993).
- R. Foot, M. J. Thomson, and R. R. Volkas, Phys. Rev. D 53, 5349 (1996).
- X. Shi, Phys. Rev. D 54, 2753 (1996).
- R. Foot and R. R. Volkas, Phys. Rev. D 56, 6653 (1997).
- D. Nötzold and G. Raffelt, Nucl. Phys. B307, 924 (1988).
- B. H. J. McKeller and M. J. Thomson, Phys. Rev. D 49, 2710 (1994).
- G. M. Fuller and R. A. Malaney, Phys. Rev. D 43, 3136 (1991).
- G. Steigman, D. N. Schramm, and J. E. Gunn, Phys. Lett. 66B, 262 (1977); for a recent update, see C. Y. Cardall and G. M. Fuller, Astrophys. J. 472, 435 (1996).
- S. Burles and D. Tytler, in the Proceedings of the Second Oak Ridge Symposium on Atomic & Nuclear Astrophysics, edited by A. Mezzacappa (Institute of Physics, Bristol, in press), and references therein.
- C. Y. Cardall and G. M. Fuller, Phys. Rev. D 54, 1260 (1996).
- K. A. Olive, E. Skillman, and G. Steigman, Astrophys. J. 483, 788 (1997).
- Y. Izotov and T. X. Thuan, Astrophys. J. 500, 188 (1998).
- B. Dorman, Y. Lee, and D. A. VandenBerg, Astrophys. J. 366, 115 (1991).
- R. Foot and R. R. Volkas, Phys. Rev. D 55, 5147 (1997).
- R. Foot (unpublished).
- E. W. Kolb and M. S. Turner, The Early Universe (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1990).
- G. Kauffmann and S. Charlot, Astrophys. J. Lett. 430, L97 (1994).
- A. Klypin, S. Borgani, J. Holtzman, and J. Primack, Astrophys. J. 444, 1 (1995).
- C. Ma et al., Astron. J. 484, L1 (1997).
- See, e.g., M. A. K. Gross et al., Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. (to be published).
- A. G. Riess et al., Astron. J. (to be published),
- G. G. Raffelt, Astrophys. J. 365, 559 (1990), and references therein.
- X. Shi, G. M. Fuller, and K. Abazajian (in preparation).