Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Direct ζ-function approach and renormalization of one-loop stress tensors in curved spacetimes

Valter Moretti

  • European Centre for Theoretical Studies in Nuclear Physics and Related Areas Villa Tambosi, Strada delle Tabarelle 286 I-38050 Villazzano, TN, Italy
  • Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Gruppo Collegato di Trento I-38050 Povo, TN, Italy

Phys. Rev. D 56, 7797 – Published 15 December, 1997

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.56.7797

Abstract

A method which uses a generalized tensorial ζ function to compute the renormalized stress tensor of a quantum field propagating in a (static) curved background is presented. The method does not use point-splitting procedures or off-diagonal ζ functions but employs an analytic continuation of a generalized ζ function. The starting point of the method is the direct computation of the functional derivatives of the Euclidean one-loop effective action with respect to the background metric. It is proven that the method, when available, gives rise to a conserved stress tensor and, in the case of a massless conformally coupled field, produces the conformal anomaly formula directly. Moreover, it is proven that the obtained stress tensor agrees with statistical mechanics in the case of a finite-temperature theory. The renormalization procedure is controlled by the structure of the poles of the stress-tensor ζ function. The infinite renormalization is automatic due to a “magic” cancellation of two poles. The remaining finite renormalization involves locally geometrical terms arising by a certain residue. Such terms are also conserved and thus represent just a finite renormalization of the geometric part of the Einstein equations (customary generalized through high-order curvature terms). The method is checked in several particular cases finding a perfect agreement with other approaches. First the method is checked in the case of a conformally coupled massless field in the static Einstein universe where all hypotheses initially requested by the method hold true. Second, dropping the hypothesis of a closed manifold, the method is checked in the open static Einstein universe. Finally, the method is checked for a massless scalar field in the presence of a conical singularity in the Euclidean manifold (i.e., Rindler spacetimes, large mass black hole manifold, cosmic string manifold). Concerning the last case in particular, the method is proven to give rise to the stress tensor already got by the point-splitting approach for every coupling with the curvature regardless of the presence of the singular curvature. Comments on the measure employed in the path integral, the use of the optical manifold and the different approaches to renormalize the Hamiltonian are made.

References (35)

  1. R. M. Wald, Quantum Field Theory and Black Hole Thermodynamics in Curved Spacetime (The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1984).
  2. J. Schwinger, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 37, 452 (1951).
  3. N. D. Birrel and P. C. W. Davies, Quantum Fields in Curved Space (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1982).
  4. S. W. Hawking, Commun. Math. Phys. 55, 133 (1977).
  5. E. Elizalde, S. D. Odintsov, A. Romeo, A. A. Bytsenko, and S. Zerbini, Zeta Regularization Techniques with Applications (World Scientific, Singapore, 1994).
  6. K. Fujikawa, Phys. Rev. Lett. 42, 1195 (1979); 44, 1733 (1980).
  7. D. J. Toms, Phys. Rev. D 12, 3796 (1987).
  8. A. A. Bytsenko, G. Cognola, L. Vanzo, and S. Zerbini, Phys. Rep. 266, 1 (1996).
  9. G. Cognola, L. Vanzo, and S. Zerbini, Phys. Rev. D 52, 4548 (1995); Class. Quantum Grav. 12, 1927 (1995).
  10. S. Zerbini, G. Cognola, and L. Vanzo, Phys. Rev. D 54, 2699 (1996).
  11. D. Iellici and V. Moretti, Phys. Rev. D 54, 7459 (1996).
  12. V. Moretti and D. Iellici, Phys. Rev. D 55, 3552 (1997).
  13. G. Cognola, L. Vanzo, S. Zerbini, Phys. Lett. B 241, 381 (1990).
  14. D. Iellici, Class. Quantum Grav. (to be published), Report No. UTF-397, gr-qc/9704077.
  15. N. G. Phillips and B. L. Hu, Phys. Rev. D 55, 6123 (1996).
  16. I. Chavel, Eigenvalues in Riemannian Geometry (Academic, Orlando, FL, 1984).
  17. S. A. Fulling, Aspects of Quantum Field Theory in Curved Space-Time (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England 1991).
  18. R. K. Unz, Nuovo Cimento A 92, 397 (1986); Phys. Rev. D 32, 2539 (1985).
  19. S. P. de Alwis and N. Ohta, Phys. Rev. D 52, 3529 (1995).
  20. V. P. Frolov and D. V. Fursaev, Phys. Rev. D 56, 2212 (1997).
  21. V. P. Frolov, D. V. Fursaev, and A. I. Zelnikov, Nucl. Phys. B486, 339 (1997).
  22. V. P. Frolov and D. V. Fursaev, gr-qc/97050207.
  23. T. S. Bunch, Phys. Rev. D 18, 1844 (1978).
  24. D. V. Fursaev and S. N. Solodukhin, Phys. Rev. D 52, 2133 (1995).
  25. V. P. Frolov and E. M. Serebriany, Phys. Rev. D 35, 3779 (1987).
  26. G. Cognola, K. Kirsten, and L. Vanzo, Phys. Rev. D 49, 1029 (1994).
  27. S. Zerbini, G. Cognola, and L. Vanzo, Phys. Rev. D 54, 2699 (1996).
  28. B. S. Kay and U. M. Studer, Commun. Math. Phys. 136, 103 (1991).
  29. G. ’t Hooft, Nucl. Phys. B256, 727 (1985).
  30. A. D. Barvinskii and S. N. Solodukhin, Nucl. Phys. B479, 305 (1996).
  31. S. N. Solodukhin, Phys. Rev. D 56, 4968 (1997).
  32. H. Hotta, T. Kato, and K. Nagata, Class. Quantum Grav. 14, 1917 (1997).
  33. V. Moretti, Class. Quantum Grav. 14, L123 (1997).
  34. V. Moretti and L. Vanzo, Phys. Lett. B 375, 54 (1996).
  35. G. Landi and C. Rovelli, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 3051 (1997).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation