- Access by Xinjiang University
Supersymmetric inflation with constraints on superheavy neutrino masses
Phys. Rev. D 56, 1324 – Published 15 July, 1997
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.56.1324
Abstract
We consider a supersymmetric model of inflation in which the primordial density fluctuations are nearly scale invariant (spectral index with an amplitude proportional to , where GeV denotes the scale of the gauge symmetry breaking associated with inflation. The 60 or so foldings take place when all relevant scales are close to , which helps suppress supergravity corrections. The gravitino and baryogenesis (via leptogenesis) constraints help determine the two heaviest right-handed neutrino masses to be GeV and GeV.
References (14)
- G. Dvali, Q. Shafi, and R. K. Schaefer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 1886 (1994).
- A. D. Linde, Phys. Lett. B 259, 38 (1991); Phys. Rev. D 49, 748 (1994).
- For an earlier attempt at inflation with this superpotential, see E. J. Copeland, A. R. Liddle, D. H. Lyth, E. D. Stewart, and D. Wands, Phys. Rev. D 49, 6410 (1994). Supersymmetric inflation has a long history and there are several reviews available, see, e.g., A. D. Linde, Particle Physics and Inflationary Cosmology (Harwood Academic, Switzerland, 1990).
- The soft supersymmetry-breaking scalar masses can be safely ignored.
- A. R. Liddle and D. H. Lyth, Phys. Rep. 231, 1 (1993).
- The supergravity-induced inflaton mass remains exactly zero even if we include in all possible nonrenormalizable terms involving , , allowed by the gauge and symmetries, and with a minimal Kähler potential [see first reference in [[3]] and E. D. Stewart, Phys. Rev. D 51, 6847 (1995).] The fact that plays a crucial role if higher order terms are included in the Kähler potential. The inflaton mass can then be kept with only a mild tuning of just one parameter [G. Dvali (private communication)]. In many other inflationary scenarios one needs to adjust an infinite number of parameters.
- W. Buchmüller and D. Wyler, Phys. Lett. B 249, 458 (1990); W. Buchmüller and T. Yanagida, 302, 240 (1993).
- K. S. Babu (private communication).
- M. Fugugita and T. Yanagida, Phys. Lett. B 174, 45 (1986); G. Lazarides and Q. Shafi, 258, 305 (1991); G. Lazarides, C. Panagiotakopoulos, and Q. Shafi, 315, 325 (1993); L. Covi, E. Roulet, and F. Vissani, 384, 169 (1996).
- J. A. Harvey and M. S. Turner, Phys. Rev. D 42, 3344 (1990).
- L. E. Ibáñez and F. Quevedo, Phys. Lett. B 283, 261 (1992).
- Q. Shafi and F. W. Stecker, Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 1292 (1984). For a recent review, see A. R. Liddle, D. H. Lyth, R. K. Schaefer, Q. Shafi, and P. T. Viana, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 281, 531 (1996).
- R. K. Schaefer, Q. Shafi, and F. W. Stecker, Astrophys. J. 347, 575 (1989); J. Holtzman, Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 74, 1 (1989).
- C. L. Bennett, et al., Astrophys. J. Lett. 464, 1 (1996).