Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

New symmetries of supersymmetric effective Lagrangians

Markus A. Luty

John March-Russell

Hitoshi Murayama

  • Center for Theoretical Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139

  • School of Natural Sciences, Institute for Advanced Study, Olden Lane, Princeton, New Jersey 08540

  • Theoretical Physics Group, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, 1 Cyclotron Road, Berkeley, California 94720

Phys. Rev. D 52, 1190 – Published 15 July, 1995

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.52.1190

Abstract

We consider the structure of effective Lagrangians describing the low-energy dynamics of supersymmetric theories in which a global symmetry G is spontaneously broken to a subgroup H while supersymmetry is unbroken. In accordance with the supersymmetric Goldstone theorem, these Lagrangians contain Nambu-Goldstone superfields associated with a coset space Gc/H^, where Gc is the complexification of G and H^ is the largest subgroup of Gc that leaves the order parameter invariant. The Lagrangian may also contain additional light matter fields. To analyze the effective Lagrangian for the matter fields we first consider the case where the effective Lagrangian is obtained by integrating out heavy modes at weak coupling (but including nonperturbative effects such as instantons). We show that the superpotential of the matter fields is H^ invariant, which can give rise to nontrivial relations among independent H invariants in the superpotential. We also show that the Kähler potential of the matter fields can be restricted by a remnant of H^ symmetry. These results are nonperturbative and have a simple group-theoretic interpretation. When we relax the weak-coupling constraints, there appear to be additional possibilities for the action of H^ on the matter fields, hinting that the constraints imposed by H^ may be even richer in strongly coupled theories.

References (23)

  1. M. Veltman, Acta Phys. Pol. B12, 437 (1981); L. Maiani, in Proceedings of the Eleventh Gif sur Yvette Summer School on Particle Physics, Gif sur Yvette, France, 1979 (Institute National de Physique Nucléaire et de Physique des Particules, Paris, 1980), p. 3; S. Dimopoulos and S. Raby, Nucl. Phys. B192, 353 (1981); E. Witten, ibid. B188, 513 (1981); M. Dine, W. Fischler and M. Srednicki, ibid. B189, 575 (1981).
  2. S. Coleman, J. Wess and B. Zumino, Phys. Rev. 117, 2239 (1969).
  3. C. Callan, S. Coleman, J. Wess and B. Zumino, Phys. Rev. 117, 2239 (1969).
  4. W. Lerche, Nucl. Phys. B248, 475 (1984).
  5. W. Lerche, Nucl. Phys. B238, 582 (1984).
  6. M. Bando, T. Kuramoto, T. Maskawa and S. Uehara, Prog. Theor. Phys. 72, 313 (1984).
  7. W. Buchmuller, R. Peccei and T. Yanagida, Nucl. Phys. B227, 503 (1983); G. Shore, ibid. B248, 123 (1984); W. Lerche and D. Lust, ibid. B244, 157 (1984).
  8. M. T. Grisaru, W. Siegel and M. Rocek, Nucl. Phys. B159, 429 (1979).
  9. T. Kugo, I. Ojima and T. Yanagida, Phys. Lett. 135B, 402 (1984); E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B185, 513 (1981).
  10. N. Seiberg, Phys. Lett. B 318, 469 (1993).
  11. See, for example, N. Seiberg, Phys. Rev. D 49, 6857 (1994); K. Intriligator, R. G. Leigh and N. Seiberg, 50, 1092 (1994).
  12. I. Affleck, M. Dine and N. Seiberg, Nucl. Phys. B241, 493 (1984).
  13. B. Ovrut and J. Wess, Phys. Rev. D 25, 409 (1982).
  14. J. Wess and B. Zumino, Phys. Lett. 37B, 95 (1971).
  15. See, for example, D. Nemeschansky and R. Rohm, Nucl. Phys. B249, 157 (1985).
  16. M. A. Shifman and A. I. Vainshtein, Nucl. Phys. B277, 456 (1986).
  17. B. Zumino, Phys. Lett. 87B, 203 (1979).
  18. W. Buchmuller and W. Lerche, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 175, 159 (1987).
  19. A. Kotcheff and G. Shore, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 4, 4391 (1989).
  20. A. Borel, Linear Algebraic Groups (Springer, Berlin, 1991).
  21. This Kähler potential is not the most general one possible, since there are other K invariant terms that can be written.
  22. The formalism developed here can also be applied to the flat directions in supersymmetric gauge theories. If one works in terms of gauge invariant order parameters, it can be shown that the flat directions can be classified as either SNGB's associated with the breaking of classical global symmetries or as massless ``matter'' fields.
  23. D. Vogan (private communication).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation