- Access by Xinjiang University
Arrow of time in a recollapsing quantum universe
Phys. Rev. D 51, 4145 – Published 15 April, 1995
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.51.4145
Abstract
We argue that the Wheeler-DeWitt equation with a consistent boundary condition is only compatible with an arrow of time that formally reverses in a recollapsing universe. To recover a classically recollapsing universe in terms of wave packets, we impose the usual boundary condition of excluding exponentially increasing wave functions for large scale factors. Consistency of these opposite arrows is then facilitated by quantum effects in the region of the classical turning point. We also discuss in this context the meaning of the time-asymmetric expression used in the definition of ‘‘consistent histories.’’ Since gravitational time dilation diverges at horizons, one has to conclude that collapsing matter must start reexpanding ‘‘anticausally’’ (controlled by the reversed arrow) in this scenario before horizons or singularities can form. There would then also be no mass inflation nor any information loss paradox.
References (42)
- H.D. Zeh, The Physical Basis of the Direction of Time (Springer, Berlin, 1992).
- H. Price, in Time's Arrow Today, edited by S. Savitt (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1994).
- H.D. Zeh, in Physical Origins of Time Asymmetry, edited by J.J. Halliwell, J.P. Perez Mercader, and W.H. Zurek (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1994).
- P. Pearle, in Sixty two Years of Uncertainty, edited by A.I. Miller (Plenum, New York, 1990).
- R. Penrose, in Quantum Gravity 2, edited by C.J. Isham, R. Penrose, and D.W. Sciama (Clarendon Press, London, 1981).
- J.B. Barbour, in Quantum Concepts in Space and Time, edited by R. Penrose and C.J. Isham (Clarendon Press, London, 1986).
- D. Giulini, Phys. Rev. D (to be published).
- H.D. Conradi and H.D. Zeh, Phys. Lett. A 154, 321 (1991).
- T. Gold, Am. J. Phys. 30, 403 (1962).
- S.W. Hawking, in Physical Origins of Time Asymmetry [3].
- S.W. Hawking, R. Laflamme and G.W. Lyons, Phys. Rev. D 47, 5342 (1993).
- D.N. Page, Phys. Rev. D 32, 2496 (1985).
- S.W. Hawking, Phys. Rev. D 32, 2489 (1985).
- J.B. Hartle and S.W. Hawking, Phys. Rev. D 28, 2960 (1983).
- H.D. Zeh, Phys. Lett. A 116, 9 (1986).
- H.D. Zeh, Phys. Lett. A 126, 311 (1988).
- H.D. Zeh, in Complexity, Entropy and the Physics of Information, edited by W.H. Zurek (Addison Wesley, Reading, MA, 1990).
- J.J. Halliwell and S.W. Hawking, Phys. Rev. D 31, 1777 (1985).
- S.W. Hawking and Z.C. Wu, Phys. Lett. 151B, 15 (1985).
- A. Higuchi and R. Wald, Phys. Rev. D. 51, 544 (1995).
- C. Kiefer, Phys. Rev. D 38, 1761 (1988).
- J.J. Halliwell and M.E. Ortiz, Phys. Rev. D 48, 748 (1993).
- J.B. Hartle, in Quantum Physics and the Universe, edited by S. Coleman (World Scientific, Singapore, 1991).
- J.J. Halliwell, Phys. Rev. D 38, 2468 (1988).
- C. Kiefer, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 207, 53 (1991).
- R. Laflamme and E.P.S. Shellard, Phys. Rev. D 35, 2315 (1987).
- C. Kiefer, Class. Quantum Grav. 4, 1369 (1987).
- J.B. Barbour, Phys. Rev. D 47, 5422 (1993).
- H.D. Zeh, in Stochastic Evolution of Quantum States in Open Systems and in Measurement Processes, edited by L. Diósi and B. Lukács (World Scientific, Singapore, 1994).
- C. Kiefer, Phys. Rev. D 47, 5414 (1993).
- R. Laflamme, Class. Quantum Grav. 10, L79 (1993).
- L. Schulman, in Physical Origins of Time Asymmetry [3].
- P.C.W. Davies and J. Twamley, Class. Quantum Grav. 10, 931 (1993).
- R.B. Partridge, Nature 244, 263 (1973).
- H.D. Zeh, Phys. Lett. A 172, 189 (1993).
- E. Joos, Phys. Rev. D 29, 1626 (1984).
- J.P. Paz and W.H. Zurek, Phys. Rev. D 48, 2728 (1993).
- R. Griffiths, J. Stat. Phys. 36, 219 (1984).
- Y. Aharonov, P.G. Bergmann and J.L. Lebowitz, Phys. Rev. 134B, 1410 (1964).
- M. Gell Mann and J.B. Hartle, in Physical Origins of Time Asymmetry [3].
- D.N. Page, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 4034 (1993).
- A.E. Sikkema and W. Israel, Nature 349, 45 (1991).