Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Massive τ neutrino and SN 1987A

G. Sigl

Michael S. Turner

  • Department of Astronomy & Astrophysics, Enrico Fermi Institute, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637-1433
  • NASA/Fermi Astrophysics Center, Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois 60510-0500

  • Department of Astronomy & Astrophysics, Enrico Fermi Institute, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637-1433
  • NASA/Fermilab Astrophysics Center, Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois 60510-0500
  • Department of Physics, Enrico Fermi Institute, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637-1433

Phys. Rev. D 51, 1499 – Published 15 February, 1995

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.51.1499

Abstract

The emission of MeV-mass τ neutrinos from newly formed neutron stars is considered in a simple, but accurate, model based upon the diffusion approximation. The τ-neutrinosphere temperature is found to increase with mass so that the emission of massive τ neutrinos is not suppressed by the Boltzmann factor previously used, (mν/Tν)1.5exp(-mν/Tν), where Tν∼4 MeV–8 MeV. For short τ neutrino lifetimes (τν103 sec) decays and inverse decays lead to a reduction in the temperature of the τ neutrinosphere. Using our results, we revise limits to the mass and lifetime of an MeV-mass τ neutrino based upon SN 1987A. Our constraints, together with bounds based upon primordial nucleosynthesis and laboratory experiments, exclude the possibility of a τ neutrino more massive than 0.4 MeV if the dominant decay mode is radiative and τν≳2.5×1012 sec (mν/MeV). The lifetime restriction does not apply for the modes ντνe,μ+γ. Our technique and results are easily generalized to other hypothetical MeV-mass particles whose interactions are of roughly weak strength. Finally, we speculate on the possible role a 15 MeV–30 MeV τ neutrino might play in powering supernova explosions.

References (26)

  1. K. Hirata et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 1490 (1987); R. M. Bionta et al., ibid. 58, 1494 (1987).
  2. F. Von Feilitzsch and L. Oberauer, Phys. Lett. B 200, 580 (1988).
  3. E. L. Chupp, W. F. Vestrand and C. Repping, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 505 (1989).
  4. E. W. Kolb and M. S. Turner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 509 (1989).
  5. S. A. Bludman, Phys. Rev. D 45, 4720 (1992).
  6. J. M. Soares and L. M. Wolfenstein, Phys. Rev. D 40, 3666 (1989); Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 1310 (1990).
  7. L. Oberauer, C. Hagner, G. Raffelt and E. Rieger, Astropart. Phys. 1, 377 (1993).
  8. S. W. Falk and D. N. Schramm, Phys. Lett. 79B, 511 (1978); R. Cowsik, D. N. Schramm and P. Höflich, ibid. 218, 91 (1989).
  9. L. Montanet et al., Phys. Rev. D 50, 1173 (1994).
  10. CLEO Collaboration, D. Cinabro et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 3700 (1993); ARGUS Collaboration, H. Albrecht et al., Phys. Lett. B 292, 221 (1992).
  11. See, e.g., A. Dar and S. Dado, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 2368 (1987); Oberauer, Hagner, Raffelt, and Rieger [7]; K. S. Babu, T. M. Gould and I. Z. Rothstein, Phys. Lett. B 321, 140 (1994); R. N. Mohapatra, S. Nussinov and X. Zhang, Phys. Rev. D 49, 3434 (1994); S. Dodelson, G. Gyuk and M. S. Turner, ibid. 49, 5068 (1994).
  12. A. Burrows, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 40, 181 (1990), and references therein.
  13. D. L. Tubbs and D. N. Schramm, Astrophys. J. 201, 467 (1975); S. W. Bruenn and W. C. Haxton, ibid. 376, 678 (1991).
  14. M. S. Turner, Phys. Rev. D 45, 1066 (1992).
  15. G. G. Raffelt and D. Seckel, Max Planck Institute and Bartol Research Institute Report No. MPI Ph/93 90 BA 93 43 (unpublished).
  16. E. W. Kolb and M. S. Turner, The Early Universe (Addison Wesley, Redwood City, CA, 1990), Chap. 5.
  17. A. Burrows, R. Gandhi and M. S. Turner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 3834 (1992); R. Mayle, D. N. Schramm, M. S. Turner and J. Wilson, Phys. Lett. B 317, 119 (1993); S. Dodelson, J. A. Frieman and M. S. Turner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 2572 (1992), and references therein.
  18. W. D. Arnett et al., Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 27, 629 (1989).
  19. Dodelson, Gyuk, and Turner [11].
  20. Mohapatra, Nussinov, and Zhang [11]. These authors also suggest other ways, in addition to the expected branching ratio of 103 due to radiative corrections, in which decay produced epm might produce photons.
  21. Another, possibly more stringent, limit based upon SN 1987A follows the analysis of data from the γ ray detector on the late Pioneer Venus Orbiter (PVO); A. Jaffe and M. S. Turner (unpublished).
  22. A. M. Cooper Sarkar et al., Phys. Lett. 160B, 207 (1985); Babu, Gould, and Rothstein [11].
  23. M. Kawasaki et al., Nucl. Phys. B419, 105 (1994).
  24. Babu, Gould, and Rothstein [11].
  25. T. M. Gould and I.Z. Rothstein, Phys. Lett. B 333, 545 (1994).
  26. Dodelson, Frieman, and Turner [17].

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation