Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Renormalization of composite operators in Yang-Mills theories using a general covariant gauge

J. C. Collins and R. J. Scalise

  • The Pennsylvania State University, Department of Physics, 104 Davey Laboratory, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802

Phys. Rev. D 50, 4117 – Published 15 September, 1994

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.50.4117

Abstract

Essential to QCD applications of the operator product expansion, etc., is a knowledge of those operators that mix with gauge-invariant operators. A standard theorem asserts that the renormalization matrix is triangular: Gauge-invariant operators have ‘‘alien’’ gauge-variant operators among their counterterms, but, with a suitably chosen basis, the necessary alien operators have only themselves as counterterms. Moreover, the alien operators are supposed to vanish in physical matrix elements. A recent calculation by Hamberg and van Neerven apparently contradicts these results. By explicit calculations with the energy-momentum tensor, we show that the problems arise because of subtle infrared singularities that appear when gluonic matrix elements are taken on shell at zero momentum transfer.

References (26)

  1. K. Wilson, Phys. Rev. 179, 1499 (1969).
  2. W. Zimmermann, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 77, 536;570 (1973).
  3. D. Gross and F. Wilczek, Phys. Rev. D 8, 3633 (1973).
  4. J. Collins, D. Soper, and G. Sterman, in Perturbative QCD, edited by A. Mueller (World Scientific, Singapore, 1989).
  5. S. D. Joglekar and B. W. Lee, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 97, 160 (1976).
  6. M. Henneaux, Phys. Lett. B 313, 35 (1993).
  7. R. Hamberg, Ph.D. thesis, University of Leiden, 1991.
  8. R. Hamberg and W. van Neerven, Nucl. Phys. B379, 143 (1992).
  9. E. Floratos, D. Ross and C. Sachrajda, Nucl. Phys. B152, 493 (1979).
  10. A. Gonzalez Arroyo and C. Lopez, Nucl. Phys. B166, 429 (1980).
  11. E. Floratos, C. Kounnas and R. Lacaze, Phys. Lett. 98B, 285 (1981).
  12. W. Furmanski and R. Petronzio, Phys. Lett. 97B, 437 (1980).
  13. J. C. Collins, Renormalization (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1984).
  14. D. Freedman, I. Muzinich and E. Weinberg, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 87, 95 (1974).
  15. D. Freedman and E. Weinberg, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 87, 354 (1974).
  16. B. Harris and J. Smith, ``Gauge Dependence of the Energy Momentum Tensor in Pure Yang Mills, " Institute for Theoretical Physics, SUNY Stony Brook Report No. ITP SB 94 04, 1994 (unpublished).
  17. M. Henneaux and C. Teitelboim, Quantization of Gauge Systems (Princeton University, Princeton, N.J., 1992).
  18. T. Kugo and I. Ojima, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 66 (1979).
  19. N. Nakanishi and I. Ojima, Covariant Operator Formalism of Gauge Theories and Quantum Gravity, Lecture Notes in Physics Vol. 27 (World Scientific, Singapore, 1990).
  20. F. Belinfante, Physica 7, 449 (1940).
  21. G. Wentzel, Quantum Theory of Fields (Interscience Publishers, New York, 1949).
  22. J. Dixon and J. Taylor, Nucl. Phys. B78, 552 (1974).
  23. J. Vermaseren, form (CAN, Amsterdam, 1991) (Version 1.1, 15 August 1991), available by anonymous ftp at nikhefh.nikhef.nl:pub/form/.
  24. S. D. Joglekar, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 108, 233 (1977).
  25. C. Lee, Phys. Rev. D 14, 1078 (1976).
  26. M. Henneaux, Classical Foundations of BRST Symmetry, Monographs and Textbooks in Physical Science Vol. 7 (Bibliopolis, Napoli, 1988).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation