- Access by Xinjiang University
Magnetic Quarks and Electric Quarks in Hadrons
Phys. Rev. D 5, 950 – Published 15 February, 1972
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.5.950
Abstract
Dirac's magnetic monopoles are generalized to have aspects which are similar to the conventional quarks (electric quarks). Such magnetic monopoles are called magnetic quarks. This work assumes that a baryon consists of three solid bodies called electromagnetic quarks, and that an electromagnetic quark and an electromagnetic antiquark form a meson. Each of these electromagnetic quarks is considered to be composed of one electric quark and one magnetic antiquark. Such a speculation solves the difficulty in statistics faced by the paraquark model and allows the existence of anomalous charge conjugation parity of mesonic states. New baryon mass relations and magnetic moments have been derived. Finally, a strong electric dipole moment is predicted to exist in a baryon state with nonzero electromagnetic-quark orbital angular momentum, .
References (30)
- M. Gell-Mann, Phys. Letters 8, 214 (1964) G. Zweig, CERN Report No. CERN-TH-412, 1964 (unpublished)
- P. A. M. Dirac, Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) A133, 60 (1931) Phys. Rev. 74, 817 (1948)
- J. Schwinger, Science 165, 757 (1969) ibid.166, 690 (1969)
- M. Y. Han and Y. Nambu, Phys. Rev. 139, B1006 (1965) M. Y. Han and L. C. Biedenharn, Phys. Rev. Letters 24, 118 (1970)
- C. K. Chang, University of Michigan report, 1969 (unpublished)
- C. K. Chang, University of Houston report, 1970 (unpublished)
- C. K. Chang, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc., Series II 15, 1374 (1970)
- C. B. A. McCusker and I. Cairns, Phys. Rev. Letters 23, 658 (1969) I. Cairns, C. B. A. McCusker, L. S. Peak, and R. L. S. Woolcott, Phys. Rev. 186, 1394 (1969)
- R. K. Adair and H. Kasha, Phys. Rev. Letters 23, 1355 (1969) H. Frauenfelder, U. E. Kruse, and R. D. Sard, ibid. 24, 33 (1970) D. C. Rahn and R. I. Louttit, ibid. 24, 279 (1970) W. T. Chu, Y. S. Kim, W. J. Beam, and N. Kwak, ibid. 24, 917 (1970)
- O. W. Greenberg, Phys. Rev. Letters 13, 598 (1964)
- H. S. Green, Phys. Rev. 90, 270 (1953)
- A. N. Mitra and D. P. Majumdar, Phys. Rev. 150, 1194 (1966)
- R. H. Dalitz, in Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on High Energy Physics, Berkeley, 1966 (University of California Press, Berkeley, 1967), p. 215
- H. C. Fitz et al., Phys. Rev. 111, 1406 (1958) H. Bradner and W. M. Isbell, ibid. 114, 603 (1959) E. Amaldi, G. Baroni, and A. Manfredini, Nuovo Cimento 28, 773 (1963) E. Goto, H. H. Kolm, and K. W. Ford, Phys. Rev. 132, 387 (1963)
Omitted endnote
Omitted endnote
- S. Ishida, Progr. Theoret. Phys. (Kyoto) 32, 922 (1964) ibid.34, 64 (1965)
- J. Iizuka, Progr. Theoret. Phys. (Kyoto) 35, 117 (1966) ibid.35, 309 (1966)
- O. Sinanoǧlu, Phys. Rev. Letters 16, 207 (1966)
- A. Hendry, Nuovo Cimento 43A, 1191 (1966)
- Particle Data Group, Phys. Letters 33B, 1 (1970)
- D. Sivers, Phys. Rev. D 2, 2040 (1970)
- R. H. Socolow, Acta Phys. Acad. Sci. Hung. 22, 129 (1967)
- H. R. Rubinstein, F. Scheck, and R. H. Socolow, Phys. Rev. 154, 1608 (1967)
- Particle Data Group, Phys. Letters 33B, 1 (1970)
- J. M. Blatt and V. F. Weisskopf, Theoretical Nuclear Physics (Wiley, New York, 1952) P. Caldirola, Phys. Rev. 69, 608 (1946)
- H. Margenau, Phys. Rev. 57, 383 (1940) R. G. Sachs, ibid. 69, 611 (1946) G. Breit, ibid. 71, 400 (1947) H. Primakoff, ibid. 72, 118 (1947) G. Breit and I. Bloch, ibid. 72, 135 (1947) R. G. Sachs, ibid. 72, 312 (1947)
- R. G. Sachs, Phys. Rev. 74, 433 (1948) P. Morrison, ibid. 74, 1224 (1948)
- R. Avery and R. G. Sachs, Phys. Rev. 74, 1320 (1948) R. Avery and E. N. Adams, ibid. 75, 1106 (1949) R. K. Osborn and L. L. Foldy, ibid. 79, 795 (1950)
- G. E. Harrison, P. G. H. Sandars, and S. J. Wright, Phys. Rev. Letters 22, 1263 (1969) J. K. Baird, P. D. Miller, W. B. Dress, and N. F. Ramsey, Phys. Rev. 179, 1285 (1969)