- Access by Xinjiang University
Flavor unification and discrete non-Abelian symmetries
Phys. Rev. D 49, 3741 – Published 1 April, 1994
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.49.3741
Abstract
Grand unified theories with fermions transforming as irreducible representations of a discrete non-Abelian flavor symmetry can lead to realistic fermion masses, without requiring small fundamental parameters. We construct a specific example of a supersymmetric GUT based on the flavor symmetry Δ(75), a subgroup of SU(3), which can explain the observed quark and lepton masses and mixing angles. The model predicts tanβ≃1 and gives a τ neutrino mass ≃/=10 eV, with other neutrino masses much lighter. Combined constraints of light quark masses and perturbative unification place flavor symmetry-breaking near the GUT scale; it may be possible to probe these extremely high energies by continuing the search for flavor-changing neutral currents.
References (22)
- W. M. Fairbairn, T. Fulton and W. H. Klink, J. Math. Phys. 5, 1038 (1964).
- H. Georgi, A. V. Manohar and A. E. Nelson, Phys. Lett. 126B, 169 (1983).
- H. Georgi and S. Glashow, Phys. Rev. Lett. 32, 438 (1974); H. Georgi, H. R. Quinn and S. Weinberg, ibid. 33, 451 (1974); A. J. Buras et al., Nucl. Phys. B135, 66 (1978); S. Dimopoulos, S. Raby and F. Wilczek, Phys. Rev. D 24, 1681 (1981); S. Dimopoulos and H. Georgi, Nucl. Phys. B193, 150 (1981).
- V. Barger, M. S. Berger and P. Ohmann, Phys. Rev. D 47, 1093 (1993).
- H. Arason, D. J. Castaño, E. J. Piard and P. Ramond, Phys. Rev. D 47, 232 (1993); D. J. Castaño, E. J. Piard, and P. Ramond, Report No. UFIFT-HEP-93-18, hep-ph/9308335, 1993 (unpublished).
- C. D. Froggatt and H. B. Nielsen, Nucl. Phys. B147, 277 (1979).
- S. Dimopoulos, L. J. Hall, and Stuart Raby, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 1984 (1992); G. W. Anderson et al., Phys. Rev. D 47, 3702 (1993); L. J. Hall and A. Rasin, Phys. Lett. B 315, 164 (1993).
- P. Ramond, R. G. Roberts and G. G. Ross, Nucl. Phys. B406, 19 (1993).
- M. Leurer, Y. Nir and N. Seiberg, Nucl. Phys. B398, 319 (1993); Report No. RU-93-43, hep-ph-9310320, 1993 (unpublished).
- P. Pouliot and N. Seiberg, Phys. Lett. B 318, 169 (1993).
- D. B. Chesnut, Finite Groups and Quantum Theory (Kreiger, Malabar, FL, 1982); M. Hamermesh, Group Theory and its Application to Physical Problems (Dover, New York, 1989).
- J. A. Harvey, D. B. Reiss and P. Ramond, Nucl. Phys. B199, 223 (1982).
- G. Anderson et al., this issue, Phys. Rev. D 49, 3660 (1994); R. N. Mohapatra, Report No. hep-ph/9310265 (unpublished).
- T. Banks, Nucl. Phys. B303, 172 (1988); L. J. Hall, R. Rattazzi, and U. Sarid, Report No. LBL-33997, hep-ph/9306309, 1993 (unpublished); A. E. Nelson and L. Randall, Phys. Lett. B 316, 516 (1993).
- H. Georgi and C. Jarlskog, Phys. Lett. 86B, 297 (1979).
- M. Gell-Mann, P. Ramond, and R. Slansky, in Supergravity, Proceedings of the Workshop, Stony Brook, New York, 1979, edited by D. Z. Freedman and P. van Nieuwenhuizen (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1979).
- L. J. Hall, V. A. Kostelecky, and S. Raby, Nucl. Phys. B267, 415 (1986); H. Georgi, Phys. Lett. 169B, 231 (1986).
- F. Gabbiani and A. Masiero, Nucl. Phys. B322, 235 (1989).
- Y. Nir and N. Seiberg, Phys. Lett. B 309, 337 (1993).
- L. Hall, J. Lykken and S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. D 27, 2359 (1983).
- M. Dine and A. E. Nelson, Phys. Rev. D 48, 1277 (1993).
- M. Dine, A. Kagan and R. Leigh, Phys. Rev. D 48, 4269 (1993). .\&