- Access by Xinjiang University
Finite size Nambu-Goto string occupied by scalar fields at an arbitrary temperature
Phys. Rev. D 49, 1966 – Published 15 February, 1994
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.49.1966
Abstract
The Nambu-Goto string occupied by a set of scalar fields is studied at finite length and temperature. The string tension for a finite string turns out to be nonvanishing for any value of the temperature reaching a minimum value M̃ (r,τ for a maximum temperature . In the limit of an infinitely long string the tension vanishes at the deconfinement temperature . Thus it might be that the minimum value of the tension occurring at is a signal for a first-order transition (the correlation length being finite) to a deconfined phase with a vanishing tension. The static quark-antiquark potential also shows interesting behavior with the deconfinement radius being independent of the temperature, depending only on the normalized scalar mass parameter μ. When τ approaches the potential becomes flat for large distances, thus losing its ‘‘confining’’ linear character to an unconfining constant. For τ> the potential still exists up to a certain maximum separation between quarks where a bifurcating solution appears. This point might represent the breaking of the string and the bifurcating solution, being more energetic, is an excited string.
References (12)
- A. Antillón and G. Germán, Phys. Rev. D 47, 4567 (1993).
- Y. Nambu, in Symmetries and Quark Models, edited by R. Chand (Gordon and Breach, New York, 1970); T. Goto, Prog. Theor. Phys. 46, 1560 (1971).
- G. Germán, H. Kleinert and M. Lynker, Phys. Rev. D 46, 1699 (1992).
- L. Del Debbio, A. Di Giacomo, M. Maggiore, and S. Olejník, ``Flux tubes, monopoles and confinement in lattice QCD,'' Report No. CERN-TH 6282/91 (unpublished).
- For a review and further references, see, e.g., M. Flensburg and C. Peterson, Nucl. Phys. B283, 141 (1987).
- J. Polchinski, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 1267 (1992); J. Polchinski and Z. Yang, Phys. Rev. D 46, 3667 (1992).
- G. Germán, M. Lynker and A. Macías, Phys. Rev. D 46, 3640 (1992).
- G. Germán and M. Lynker, Phys. Rev. D 46, 5678 (1992).
- L. S. Celenza and C. M. Shakin, Phys. Rev. D 35, 1591 (1986); ibid. 36, 2843 (1987).
- O. Alvarez, Phys. Rev. D 24, 440 (1981).
- G. Germán and H. Kleinert, Phys. Rev. D 40, 1108 (1989).
- G. Germán, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 6, 1815 (1991).