Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Proposed new determination of the gravitational constant G and tests of Newtonian gravitation

Alvin J. Sanders and W. E. Deeds

  • Department of Physics and Astronomy, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996

Phys. Rev. D 46, 489 – Published 15 July, 1992

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.46.489

Abstract

The first "constant of nature" to be identified, Newton's constant of universal gravitation G, is presently the least accurately known. The currently accepted value (6.672 59±0.000 85) × 1011 m3 kg1 s2 has an uncertainty of 128 parts per million (ppm), whereas most other fundamental constants are known to less than 1 ppm. Moreover, the inverse-square law and the equivalence principle are not well validated at distances of the order of meters. We propose measurements within an orbiting satellite which would improve the accuracy of G by two orders of magnitude and also place new upper limits on the field-strength parameter α of any Yukawa-type force, assuming a null result. Preliminary analysis indicates that a test of the time variation of G may also be possible. Our proposed tests would place new limits on α=α5(q5μ)1(q5μ)2 for characteristic lengths Λ between 30 cm and 30 m and for Λ>1000 km. In terms of the mass mb of a vector boson presumed to mediate such a Yukawa-type force, the proposed experiment would place new limits on α for 7×109 eV<mbc2<7×107 eV and for mbc2<2×1013  eV. Two distinct tests of the inverse-square law, one employing interactions at intermediate distances and having a peak sensitivity if Λ is a few meters (i.e., mbc2107 eV), and the other employing interactions at longer distances and having a peak sensitivity for ΛREarth (mbc23×1014eV), would both place limits of 105 to 106 on α. These interactions also provide tests of the equivalence principle (Eötvös' experiment). The intermediate-distance interaction would test the equivalence principle to 5 parts in 107 for Λ>5 m (mbc2<4×108 eV), while the longer-distance interaction would test the equivalence principle to 4 parts in 1013 for Λ>REarth (mbc2<3×1014eV). Specifically, we propose to observe the motion of a small mass during the encounter phase of a "horseshoe" orbit—that is, in the vicinity of its closest approach to a large mass in a nearly identical orbit. The essential aspect of the interaction of the two bodies during the encounter is an exchange of energy, and we call the proposed method the "satellite energy exchange" (SEE) method. Successful application of the SEE method to gravity measurements will depend on the particular experimental design, including the configurations of the test bodies, the characteristics of the systems for maneuvering the test bodies and the satellite, and the choice of orbital parameters, which are described below. We are not aware of any existing or proposed method which approaches the accuracy of the SEE method.

Comments & Replies

Perturbative forces in the proposed satellite energy exchange experiment

Paul T. Keyser
Phys. Rev. D 47, 3658 (1993)

Reply to "Perturbative forces in the proposed satellite energy exchange experiment"

Alvin J. Sanders and W. Edward Deeds
Phys. Rev. D 47, 3660 (1993)

References (58)

  1. E. R. Cohen and B. N. Taylor, Phys. Today 40 (8), 11 (1987) CODATA Bull. 63, 12 (1986)
  2. G. T. Gillies, Gravitational Measurements, Fundamental Metrology, and Constants (Kluwer Academic, New York, 1988), pp. 191-214
  3. H. de Boer, in Precision Measurement and Fundamental Constants II, edited by B. N. Taylor and W. D. Phillips, Natl. Bur. Stand. Special Publ. 617 (National Bureau of Standards, Washington D.C., 1984)
  4. G. T. Gillies, Am. J. Phys. 58, 525 (1990)
  5. Y. Avron and M. Livio, Astrophys. J. 304, L61 (1986) D. Berman and R. Forward, Adv. Astron. Sci. 24, 95 (1969) P. Farinella et al., Astrophys. Space Sci. 73, 417 (1980) R. L. Forward, Research Toward Feasibility of an Instrument of Measuring Gradients of Gravity (Hughes Research Corp., Malibu, CA, 1966) J. G. Hills, Astron. J. 92, 986 (1986) Anna M. Nobili et al., ESA J. 14, 389 (1990) R. C. Ritter and G. T. Gillies, University of Virignia report, 1981 (unpublished) J. P. Vinti, Celestial Mechanics 5, 204 (1972) L. S. Wilk, ed., Studies of Space Experiments to Measure Gravitational Constant Variations and the Eötvös Ratio (Measurement Systems Laboratory, MIT, Cambridge, MA, 1971)
  6. L. Facy and C. Pontikis, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris 272, 1397 (1971) O. V. Karagioz et al., Phys. Zemli 12, 106 (1976) [Phys. Solid Earth 12, 351 (1976)] G. G. Luther and W. R. Towler, Phys. Rev. Lett. 48, 121 (1982) M. U. Sagitov et al., Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 245, 567 (1979) [Sov. Phys. Dokl. 245, 20 (1981)]
  7. C. Stubbs, in Proceedings of the XXIV International Conference on High Energy Physics, Munich, West Germany, 1988, edited by R. Kotthaus and J. Kuhn (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1988), pp. 1325-1331
  8. W. M. Fairbank, in Searches for New and Exotic Phenomena, Proceedings of the Twenty-Third Rencontre de Moriond, Les Arcs, France, 1988, edited by O. Fackler and J. Tran Thanh Van (Editions Frontières, Gif-sur-Yvette, 1988)
  9. F. P. Calaprice, in Fifth Force and Neutrino Physics, Proceedings of the Twenty-fourth Rencontre de Moriond, Les Arcs, France, 1989, edited by O. Fackler and J. Tran Thanh Van (Editions Frontières, Gif-sur-Yvette, 1989)
  10. P. E. Boynton et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 3 1385 (1987) D. H. Eckhardt et al., ibid. 60, 2567 (1988) E. Fischbach et al., ibid. 56, 3 (1986) F. D. Stacey et al., Rev. Mod. Phys. 59, 157 (1987) P. Thieberger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 1066 (1987)
  11. Y. Fujii, Nature Phys. Sci. 234, 5 (1971) Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 69, 494 (1972) D. R. Long, Nature (London) 260, 417 (1976) R. E. Spero et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 44, 1645 (1980) D. R. Long, Nuovo Cimento 55B, 252 (1984) Y. T. Chen et al., Proc. R. Soc. London A394, 47 (1984)
  12. E. Fischbach and C. Talmadge, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 4, 2303 (1989) Nature (London) 356, 207 (1992)
  13. C. M. Will, Science 250, 770 (1990)
  14. D. F. Bartlett and W. L. Tew, Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 1531 (1989) S. Y. Chu and R. H. Dicke, ibid. 57, 1823 (1986) D. H. Eckhardt, ibid. 57, 2868 (1986) C. Jeckeli et al., ibid. 64, 1204 (1990) Y. E. Kim, Phys. Lett. B 195, 245 (1987)
  15. E. G. Adelberger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 849 (1987)
  16. E. G. Adleberger et al., Phys. Rev. D 42, 3267 (1990)
  17. P. Fayet, Phys. Lett. B 227, 127 (1989) R. D. Pecci, J. Sola, and C. Wetterich, ibid. 195, 183 (1987)
  18. A. de Rújula, Phys. Lett. B 180, 213 (1986)
  19. G. W. Gibbons and B. F. Whiting, Nature (London) 291, 636 (1981)
  20. T. D. Lee and C. N. Yang, Phys. Rev. 98, 1501 (1955)
  21. V. B. Braginsky and V. I. Panov, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 61, 873 (1971) [Sov. Phys. JETP 34, 463 (1972)] P. G. Roll, R. Krotkov, and R. H. Dicke, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 26, 442 (1964)
  22. R. Battiston, in Searches for New and Exotic Phenomena, Proceedings of the Twenty-Third Rencontre de Moriond, Les Ares, France, 1988, edited by O. Fackler and J. Tran Thanh Van (Editions Frontieres, Gif-sur-Yvette, 1988)
  23. Omitted endnote

  24. P. A. M. Dirac, Nature (London) 139, 323 (1937) Proc. R. Soc. London A165, 199 (1938)
  25. William J. Marciano, Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 489 (1984)
  26. Gillies, [2,3]
  27. G. H. Darwin, Acta Math. 21, 99 (1897)
  28. S. F. Dermott and C. D. Murray, Icarus 48, 1 (1981)
  29. C. F. Yoder, G. Colombo, S. P. Sinnot, and K. A. Yoder, Icarus 53, 431 (1983)
  30. Herbert Goldstein, Classical Mechanics (Addison-Wesley, New York, 1950)
  31. B. Lange, Am. Inst. Aeronaut. Astronaut. J. 2, 1590 (1964)
  32. Stanford U., J. Spacecraft Rockets 11, 637 (1974)
  33. A. J. Sanders and E. D. Black (unpublished)
  34. R. L. Forward, Phys. Rev. D 26, 735 (1982) Richard Friedberg, ibid. 36, 386 (1986)
  35. P. R. Heyl, U.S. Bur. Stand. J. Res. 5, 1243 (1930) P. R. Heyl and P. Chrzanowski, J. Res. Natl. Bur. Standards 29, 1 (1942) A. H. Cook and Y. T. Chen, J. Phys. A 15, 1591 (1982)
  36. A. H. Cook, Contemp. Phys. 9, 227 (1968)
  37. J. L. MacArthur and A. S. Posner, IEEE Trans. Geoscience Remote Sensing GE-23, 517 (1985)
  38. W. E. Deeds and C. V. Dodd, in Pressure Vessels and Piping Technology—1985—a Decade of Progress (ASME, New York, 1985)
  39. Jean Kovalevsky, Introduction to Celestial Mechanics (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1963)
  40. H. D. Black (private communication)
  41. W. N. Hess, The Radiation Belt and Magnetosphere (Ginn Blaisdale, Waltham, MA, 1968)
  42. P. J. Newrocki and Robert Papa, Atmospheric Processes (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1963)
  43. Committee for the COSPAR International Reference Atmosphere (CIRA) of COSPAR Working Group 4, CIRA 1972 (Akademie Verlag, Berlin, 1972)
  44. V. B. Braginsky and A. B. Manukin, Measurement of Weak Forces in Physics Experiments (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1977)
  45. AXIOM 2/20 Operations Manual (Zygo Corporation, 1989), Chap. 10
  46. E. Debler, Metrologia 28, 85 (1991)
  47. C. Braun, Denkschr. Akad. Wissenschaft Wien, Math. Naturwissenschaftliche Klasse 64, 187 (1897)
  48. A. H. Cook, in Three Hundred Years of Gravitation, edited by S. W. Hawking and W. Israel (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1987)
  49. R. Schoonover (private communication)
  50. G. T. Gillies (private communication)
  51. L. W. Alvarez, Phys. Today 40, 24 (1987)
  52. C. A. Wingate (private communication)
  53. Frank Colucci, Space 6, 1 (1990)
  54. Richard S. Warner (private communication)
  55. M. Froeschle and F. Mignard, Appl. Opt. 20, 3251 (1981)
  56. D. T. King (private communication)
  57. W. R. Smythe, Static and Dynamic Electricity, 3rd ed. (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1968), Sec. 5.299
  58. J. K. Hargreaves, The Upper Atmosphere and Solar-Terrestrial Relations (Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1979)

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation