Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Amplitude analysis of reaction π+nπ+πp at 5.98 and 11.85 GeV/c

M. Svec

A. de Lesquen and L. van Rossum

  • Physics Department, Dawson College, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3Z 1A4
  • McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3A 2T8

  • Département de Physique des Particules Élémentaires, Centre d’Études Nucléaires, Saclay, France

Phys. Rev. D 45, 55 – Published 1 January, 1992

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.45.55

Abstract

We present a model independent amplitude analysis of reaction π+nπ+πp at 5.98 and 11.85 GeV/c using Saclay data obtained with a transversely polarized deuteron target at the CERN Proton Synchrotron. The analysis makes use of the data in two sets of binnings to examine the dependence of amplitudes on momentum transfer t [-t≤1.0 (GeV/c)2] in the ρ0 mass region and their dependence on dipion mass below 1000 MeV for momentum transfers -t=0.2–0.4 (GeV/c)2. The analysis is performed in both t-channel and s-channel helicity frames of the dimeson state and it is verified by comparison with linear bounds on the moduli. The data yield two solutions for 8 moduli and 6 cosines of relative phases of nucleon transversity amplitudes with dimeson spin J=0 (S wave) and J=1 (P wave). The two solutions differ mainly in the S-wave contributions. Both solutions require nonzero nucleon helicity-nonflip amplitudes (A1 exchange) with phases different from phases of nucleon helicity-flip amplitudes (π exchange). Natural exchange amplitudes (A2 exchange) with opposite nucleon transversities show a crossover in their t dependence at -tc=0.4–0.5 (GeV/c)2 which has not been observed in the earlier amplitude analysis of πpππ+n at 17.2 GeV/c.

We suggest this difference may signal the influence of composite structure of hadrons and nonperturbative QCD effects in pion production. Although the mass dependence of partial-wave cross sections averaged over nucleon spins is smooth, we observe large and systematic structures in moduli squared of nucleon transversity amplitudes which reveal the essential role of nucleon spin in the pion production process. This behavior of moduli does not support the hypothesis of factorization of mass and t dependence of production amplitudes previously used in studies of meson-meson scattering. The mass dependence of S-wave amplitudes suggests the existence of a scalar state I=0 0++(750) with a width of 100–150 MeV. Our results emphasize the need for a systematic study of pion production on the level of amplitudes in a new generation of dedicated experiments with spin at the recently proposed high-intensity hadron facilities.

References (83)

  1. H. A. Bethe, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 3, 190 (1958).
  2. E. R. Schumacher and H. A. Bethe, Phys. Rev. 121, 1534 (1961).
  3. F. Halzen and C. Michael, Phys. Lett. 36B, 367 (1971).
  4. R. L. Kelly, Phys. Lett. 39B, 635 (1972).
  5. G. Cozzika et al., Phys. Lett. 40B, 281 (1972).
  6. R. C. Miller, A. Yokosawa and P. Johnson, Nuovo Cimento 22A, 99 (1974).
  7. M. Svec et al.., High Energy Physics with Polarized Beams and Polarized Targets (Argonne, 1978), Proceedings of the Third International Symposium, edited by G. H. Thomas, AIP Conf. Proc. No. 51 (AIP, New York, 1979), p. 491.
  8. M. Fujisaki et al., Nucl. Phys. B152, 232 (1979).
  9. P. W. Johnson and G. M. Thomas, Phys. Rev. D 16, 2783 (1977).
  10. I. P. Auer et al., Phys. Rev. D 32, 1609 (1985).
  11. G. R. Goldstein et al., Nucl. Phys. B80, 164 (1974).
  12. J. Bystricky, F. Lehar, P. Winternitz, J. Phys. (Paris) 39, 1 (1978); ibid. 45, 207 (1984).
  13. P. La France and P. Winternitz, J. Phys. (Paris) 41, 1391 (1980).
  14. G. R. Goldstein and M. J. Moravcsik, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 142, 219 (1982).
  15. J. K. Gottfried and J. D. Jackson, Nuovo Cimento 33, 309 (1964).
  16. G. Lutz and K. Rybicky, Max Planck Institute, Munich, Internal Report No. MPI-PAE/Exp. EI.75, 1978 (unpublished).
  17. J. G. M. de Groot, Ph.D. thesis, Universiteit van Amsterdam, 1978.
  18. H. Becker et al., Nucl. Phys. B150, 301 (1979).
  19. H. Becker et al., Nucl. Phys. B151, 46 (1979).
  20. V. Chabaud et al., Nucl. Phys. B223, 1 (1983).
  21. I. Sakrejda, Ph.D. thesis, Institute of Nuclear Physics, Cracow, 1984.
  22. K. Rybicky and I. Sakrejda, Z. Phys. C 28, 65 (1985).
  23. K. Rybicky, I. Sakrejda and J. Turnau, Acta Phys. Pol. B17, 317 (1986).
  24. M. Blackman and G. R. Goldstein, Phys. Rev. D 1, 2675 (1970).
  25. M. Babou et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods 160, 1 (1979).
  26. A. de Lesquen . et al., in Low and Intermediate Energy Kaon-Nucleon Physics, Proceedings of the Workshop, Rome, Italy, 1980, edited by E. Ferrari and G. Violini (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1981), p. 289.
  27. A. Itano . et al., in High Energy Physics with Polarized Beams and Targets, edited by C. Joseph and J. Soffer (Birkhauser, Boston, 1981), p. 560.
  28. A. de Lesquen et al.., CEN-Saclay Internal Report DPhPE No. 82-01, 1982 (unpublished), pp. 1–56.
  29. A. de Lesquen et al., Phys. Rev. D 32, 21 (1985).
  30. Particle Data Group, A. de Lesquen et al.., Record ID-4023, Rutherford Laboratory, England, 1986 (unpublished).
  31. A. de Lesquen et al., Phys. Rev. D 39, 21 (1989).
  32. M. Svec et al.., in Low and Intermediate Energy Kaon-Nucleon Physics [26], p. 305.
  33. M. Svec et al.., in High Energy Physics with Polarized Beams and Targets [27], p. 566.
  34. A. de Lesquen et al.., CEN-Saclay Internal Report DPhPE No. 82-01, 1982 (unpublished), pp. 87–110.
  35. M. Svec, , J. Phys. (Paris) Colloq. 46, C-281 (1985).
  36. M. Svec, in Hadron Spectroscopy—1985, Proceedings of the International Conference, College Park, Maryland, edited by S. Oneda, AIP Conf. Proc. No. 132 (AIP, New York, 1985), p. 68.
  37. M. Svec, A. de Lesquen, and L. van Rossum, in Intersections Between Particle and Nuclear Physics, Lake Louise, Canada, 1986, Proceedings of the Second Conference, edited by Donald F. Geesman, AIP Conf. Proc. No. 150 (AIP, New York, 1986), p. 1198.
  38. M. Svec, A. de Lesquen and L. van Rossum, Phys. Rev. D 42, 934 (1990).
  39. E. Byckling and K. Kajantie, Particle Kinematics (Wiley, New York, 1973).
  40. S. Humble, Introduction to Particle Production of Hadrons (Academic, New York, 1974).
  41. R. Saenger and W. Schmidt, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 54, 307 (1969).
  42. R. J. Cashmore, in Phenomenology of Particles at High Energies, 14th Scottish Universities Summer School in Physics, 1973, edited by R. L. Crawford and R. Jennings (Academic, New York, 1974), p. 611.
  43. D. B. Ion and C. Mihul, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 83, 41 (1975).
  44. J. D. Kimel and J. F. Owens, Nucl. Phys. B122, 469 (1977).
  45. C. Bourrely, E. Leader and J. Soffer, Phys. Rep. 59, 95 (1980).
  46. A. Kotanski, Acta Phys. Pol. 29, 699 (1966); ibid. 30, 629 (1966); ibid. B1, 45 (1970).
  47. G. Cohen-Tannoudji et al., Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 46, 239 (1968).
  48. F. D. Gault, G. R. Goldstein and H. F. Jones, Nuovo Cimento 27A, 174 (1975).
  49. P. J. Bussey et al., Nucl. Phys. B154, 205 (1980).
  50. I. I. Bronshtein and K. A. Semendyayev, Handbook of Mathematics (Gosudarstvennoe Izdatelstvo Tekhniko-Teoreticheskoi Literatury, Moscow, 1954), p. 139.
  51. M. Svec (unpublished).
  52. M. Svec, A. de Lesquen and L. van Rossum, Phys. Lett. B 220, 653 (1989).
  53. Ph. E. Gill, W. Murray, and M. M. Wright, Practical Optimization (Academic, New York, 1981).
  54. S. S. Rao, Optimization and Applications (Wiley, New York, 1984), p. 723.
  55. B. A. Murtagh and M. A. Saunders, MINOS ~ 5.0 Users Guide, Systems Optimization Laboratory Report No. SOL 83-20, Stanford University, 1983 (unpublished).
  56. I. Siline, CERN Computer Center Program Library, Report No. D510, 1971 (unpublished).
  57. P. Bonamy et al., Nucl. Phys. B52, 392 (1973).
  58. G. Girardi et al., Nucl. Phys. B76, 541 (1974).
  59. S. D. Drell, Phys. Rev. Lett. 5, 342 (1960).
  60. F. Salzman and G. Salzman, Phys. Rev. 120, 599 (1960).
  61. J. D. Jackson, Rev. Mod. Phys. 37, 484 (1965).
  62. J. D. Jackson, in High Energy Physics, Proceedings of the Les Houches Summer School of Theoretical Physics, Les Houches, France, 1965 (Gordon and Breach, New York, 1965), p. 369.
  63. S. Gasiorowicz, Elementary Particle Physics (Wiley, New York, 1966).
  64. P. D. B. Collins, Phys. Rep. C 1, 103 (1971).
  65. A. C. Irving and R. P. Worden, Phys. Rep. 34, 117 (1977).
  66. A. B. Wicklund et al., Phys. Rev. 17, 1197 (1978).
  67. M. Svec, Phys. Rev. D 22, 70 (1980).
  68. P. E. Schlein, Phys. Rev. Lett. 19, 1052 (1967).
  69. P. Estabrooks et al.., in pi-pi Scattering, Proceedings of the Tallahassee Conference, edited by D. K. Williams and V. Hagopian,AIP Conf. Proc. No. 13 (AIP, New York, 1973).
  70. P. Estabrooks et al., Nucl. Phys. B133, 490 (1978).
  71. F. Henyey, G. L. Kane, J. Pumplin and M. M. Ross, Phys. Rev. 182, 1579 (1969).
  72. P. D. B. Collins, Nucl. Phys. B52, 165 (1973).
  73. E. Vogt, Nucl. Phys. A450, 453c (1986); J. Domigo, ibid. A450, 473c (1986); G. T. Garvey, ibid. A450, 539c (1986).
  74. Canadian Kaon Factory (TRIUMF, Vancouver, 1985).
  75. Physics and A plan for a 45 GeV Facility, LANL Report No. LA-10720-MS, Los Alamos, 1986 (unpublished).
  76. Proceedings of the International Conference on a European Hadron Facility, Mainz, Germany, 1986, edited by T. Walcher [Nucl. Phys. B279, 2 (1987)].
  77. International Workshop on Hadron Facility Technology, Proceedings, Los Alamos, New Mexico, 1987, edited by H. A. Thiessen (LANL Report No. LA-11130-C, Los Alamos, 1987).
  78. Japanese Hadron Facility, in International Workshop on Hadron Facility Technology [77], p. 67.
  79. Physics at KAON, edited by D. Frekers, D. R. Gill, and J. Speth (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1990) [Z. Phys. C 46, S1 (1990)].
  80. Multiuser Hadron Spectrometer Workshop, edited by M. Comyn (TRIUMF, Vancouver, 1990).
  81. Workshop on Science at KAON, edited by M. Comyn and D. R. Gill (TRIUMF, Vancouver, 1990).
  82. G. Preparata, in Intense Hadron Facilities and Antiproton Physics, Proceedings of the Conference, edited by T. Bressani, F. Iazzi, and G. Pauli (Societa Italiana di Fisica, Bologna, Italy, 1990), Vol. 26.
  83. M. Svec, High-Energy Spin Physics: Eighth International Symposium, Proceedings of the Eighth International Symposium, edited by Kenneth J. Heller, AIP Conf. Proc. No. 187 (AIP, New York, 1989), Vol. 2, p. 1181.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation