Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Numerical simulations of the O(3) and CP1 models using the Langevin equations and the Metropolis algorithm

E. Abdalla

M. C. B. Abdalla and N. A. Alves

C. E. I. Carneiro*

  • Instituto de Física, Universidade de São Paulo, Caixa Postal 20.516, CEP 01498, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

  • Instituto de Física Téorica, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Rua Pamplona 145, CEP 01405, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

  • Instituto de Estudos Avançados—CTA 12.200, São José dos Campos, São Paulo, Brazil
  • Instituto de Física, Universidade de São Paulo, Caixa Postal 20.516, CEP 01498, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

  • *Present address: Instituto de Física, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

Phys. Rev. D 41, 571 – Published 15 January, 1990

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.41.571

Abstract

We test a proposal by Namiki and collaborators to enforce constraints on Langevin equations and Parisi's technique to calculate correlation functions via Langevin equations. The numerical study of the equivalence between the O(3) model and the bound state of the pure CP1 model, which can be demonstrated analytically, is used to measure the performance of these methods. In particular, as expected, we show that (a) the relations gO(3)=2gCP1 and EO(3)=2ECP1+2 for the couplings and energies hold beyond the classical level and (b) the mass gap as a function of the coupling is the same for both models. In addition we calculate the mass gap for the CP1 model minimally coupled to fermions. All results are compared with those obtained using the multihit Metropolis algorithm.

References (20)

  1. G. Parisi and Wu Yongshi, Sci. Sin. 24, 483 (1981)
  2. I. T. Drummond, S. Duane, and R. R. Horgan, Nucl. Phys. B220 [FS8], 119 (1983)
  3. G. G. Batrouni, G. R. Katz, A. S. Kronfeld, G. P. Lepage, B. Svetitsky, and K. G. Wilson, Phys. Rev. D 32, 2736 (1985)
  4. G. Parisi, Nucl. Phys. B180 [FS2], 378 (1981) ibid.B205 [FS5], 337 (1982)
  5. M. Namiki, I. Ohba, K. Okano, M. Rikihisa, and S. Tanaka, Prog. Theor. Phys. 76, 501 (1986)
  6. E. Dagotto and J. B. Kogut, Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 299 (1987)
  7. M. Namiki, I. Ohba, and K. Okano, Prog. Theor. Phys. 72, 350 (1984)
  8. M. Namiki, I. Ohba, K. Okano, M. Rikihisa, and S. Tanaka, Prog. Theor. Phys. 73, 186 (1985)
  9. Monte Carlo Methods in Statistical Physics, edited by K. Binder (Springer, New York, 1979)
  10. H. Eichenherr, Nucl. Phys. B146, 215 (1978) V. Golo and A. M. Perelemov, Phys. Lett. 79B, 112 (1978) E. Cremmer and J. Scherk, ibid. 65B, 341 (1978)
  11. A. D'Adda, M. Luscher, and P. Di Vecchia, Nucl. Phys. B146, 63 (1978)
  12. M. C. B. Abdalla and A. L. Santos, Acta Phys. Pol. B15, 813 (1984)
  13. A. D'Adda, M. Luscher, and P. Di Vecchia, Nucl. Phys. B152, 125 (1979)
  14. J. Schwinger, Phys. Rev. 128, 2425 (1962) R. Jackiw, in Relativity, Groups and Topology II, proceedings of Les Houches Summer School, Les Houches, France, 1983, edited by B. S. DeWitt and R. Stora (Les Houches Summer School Proceedings, Vol. 40) (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1984)
  15. P. Di Vecchia, R. Musto, F. Nicodemi, R. Pettorino, and P. Rossi, Nucl. Phys. B235 [FS11], 478 (1984)
  16. G. Fox, R. Gupta, O. Martin, and O. Otto, Nucl. Phys. B205, 145 (1982)
  17. J. B. Kogut, Rev. Mod. Phys. 55, 775 (1983)
  18. K. Binder and H. Rauch, Z. Phys. 219, 201 (1969)
  19. B. Berg, S. Meyer, and I. Montvay, Nucl. Phys. B235 [FS11], 149 (1984)
  20. E. Abdalla, M. Forger, and A. Lima Santos, Nucl. Phys. B256, 145 (1985)

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation