Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Interpretation of the kinematical properties of SN 1987A neutrino data by an admixture of νμ,ν¯μ and ντ,ν¯τ

Danuta Kiełczewska

  • Physics Department, University of California at Irvine, Irvine, California 92717
  • Instytut Fizyki Doswiadczalnej, Warsaw University, Hoza 69, Warsaw, Poland

Phys. Rev. D 41, 2967 – Published 15 May, 1990

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.41.2967

Abstract

Statistical tests suitable for small data samples are used to compare the observed energies and angles of the SN 1987A neutrino events with distributions expected for a range of assumed temperatures and relative luminosities of different neutrino species. The highest confidence levels are obtained for simulated samples with an admixture of νμ, ν¯μ and ντ, ν¯τ added to the ν¯e interactions. This is a consequence of relatively high-energy thresholds [particularly for the Irvine-Michigan-Brookhaven (IMB) detector] and νμ, ν¯μ, ντ, ν¯τ energies being greater than those of ν¯e. It is also found that a νμ, ν¯μ, ντ, ν¯τ admixture is more probable than a νe contribution for which the IMB detector is especially inefficient. A possibility of identifying νμ, ν¯μ and ντ, ν¯τ interactions from a future supernova collapse is also discussed.

References (23)

  1. K. Hirata et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 1490 (1987)
  2. R. Bionta et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 1494 (1987)
  3. E. N. Alekseev et al., Pis'ma Zh. Eksp. Teor Fiz. 45, 461 (1987) [JETP Lett. 45, 589 (1987)]
  4. K. Hirata et al., Phys. Rev. D 38, 448 (1988)
  5. C. B. Bratton et al., Phys. Rev. D 37, 3361 (1988)
  6. J. M. LoSecco, Phys. Rev. D 39, 1013 (1989)
  7. A. Burrows and J. M. Lattimer, Astrophys. J. 307, 178 (1986)
  8. A. Burrows, Astrophys. J. 334, 891 (1988)
  9. A. Burrows, Supernovae, edited by A. G. Petschek (Springer, Berlin, in press)
  10. R. Schaeffer, Y. Declais, and S. Jullian, Nature (London) 330, 142 (1987)
  11. G. Raffelt and D. Seckel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 1793 (1988)
  12. W. C. Haxton, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 1999 (1988)
  13. R. F. Sawyer, Astrophys. J. 328, 691 (1988)
  14. R. Mayle, J. R. Wilson, and D. N. Schramm, Astrophys. J. 318, 288 (1987)
  15. J. N. Bahcall, A. Dar, and T. Piran, Nature (London) 326, 135 (1987)
  16. G. De Vaucouleurs, Astrophys. J. 223, 730 (1978)
  17. W. C. Haxton, Phys. Rev. D 36, 2283 (1987)
  18. W. T. Eadie et al., Statistical Methods in Experimental Physics (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1971), p. 283
  19. S. Bruenn, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 938 (1987)
  20. R. Barbieri and R. N. Mohapatra, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 27 (1988)
  21. C. H. Llewellyn Smith, Phys. Rev. C 3, 261 (1972)
  22. E. V. Bugaev, G. S. Bisnovatyi-Kogan, M. A. Rudzsky, and Z. F. Seidov, Nucl. Phys. A324, 350 (1979)
  23. J. B. Langworthy, B. A. Lamers, and H. Überall, Nucl. Phys. A280, 351 (1977)

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation