Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Antibaryon-Baryon Scattering Problem

Richard M. Weiner

  • Department of Physics, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47401

Phys. Rev. D 4, 813 – Published 1 August, 1971

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.4.813

Abstract

The implications of the failure of duality in B¯B scattering are discussed in the framework of a quark model in which all quarks of the target interact simultaneously with all quarks in the projectile through two-body quark-antiquark interactions. It is assumed that the peculiarity of B¯B interactions, which at the particle level manifests itself through annihilation channels, is due to the strong qq¯ interaction at the quark level which inhibits the presence of non-active quarks (spectators) in the scattering process. This leads to the replacement of the additivity approach of quark amplitudes by factorization of quark amplitudes. Factorization of quark amplitudes implies, in general, nonfactorization of particle amplitudes and appearance of effects similar to cuts (dips versus peaks in the forward direction) due to the simultaneous exchange of natural and unnatural parity at the quark level. Exchange of exotic quantum numbers appears as a natural consequence of the model, without assuming the existence of exotic particles. It is, however, inhibited by the smallness of charge- and strangeness-exchange cross sections. This model should apply both for large- and small-angle scattering, the difference in these two regions manifesting itself only through different relations between the helicity amplitudes at the quark level. Predictions are made for quasielastic B¯B scattering at small and large momentum transfer. For the reactions where data exist, the agreement between the relations predicted by the model and experiment is satisfactory.

References (48)

  1. Omitted endnote

  2. J. D. Jackson, Rev. Mod. Phys. 42, 12 (1970)
  3. H. J. Lipkin, Nucl. Phys. B9, 349 (1969) Phys. Letters 32B, 301 (1970)
  4. H. Harari, Phys. Rev. Letters 22, 562 (1969)
  5. J. Rosner, Phys. Rev. Letters 22, 689 (1969)
  6. J. Rosner, Phys. Rev. Letters 21, 950 (1968) D. P. Roy and M. Suzuki, Phys. Letters 28B, 558 (1969) P. G. O. Freund and R. J. Rivers, ibid. 29B, 510 (1969) P. H. Frampton and P. G. O. Freund, Enrico Fermi Institute report, 1970 (unpublished)
  7. H. W. Atherton et al., in Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on High Energy Physics, Kiev, 1970 (to be published)
  8. H. W. Atherton et al., Phys. Letters 30B, 494 (1969)
  9. S. Pinsky, Phys. Rev. Letters 22, 677 (1969)
  10. M. Kugler, Phys. Letters 32B, 106 (1970)
  11. J. Finkelstein, CERN Report No. CERN-TH-1273, 1970 (unpublished)
  12. Symmetries and Quark Models, edited by Ramesh Chand (Gordon and Breach, New York, 1970) D. Flamm, Institute of High Energy Physics report, Vienna, 1969 (unpublished) J. J. J. Kokkedee, The Quark Model (Benjamin, New York, 1969)
  13. A. Schwimmer, Phys. Rev. 184, 1508 (1969)
  14. J. J. J. Kokkedee and L. Van Hove, Nucl. Phys. B1, 169 (1967)
  15. R. J. Glauber, in Lectures in Theoretical Physics, edited by W. E. Brittin (Interscience, New York, 1959) in High Energy Physics and Nuclear Structure, edited by G. Alexander (North Holland, Amsterdam, 1967), p. 311
  16. V. Franco, Phys. Rev. Letters 18, 1159 (1967) M. V. Barnhill, Phys. Rev. 163, 1735 (1967) A. Deloff, Nucl. Phys. B2, 597 (1967) D. R. Harrington and A. Pagnamenta, Phys. Rev. 173, 1599 (1968) N. W. Dean, Nucl. Phys. B4, 534 (1968) ibid.B7, 311 (1968) E. Shrauner et al., Phys. Rev. 177, 2590 (1969) ibid.181, 1930 (1969) E. Shrauner, Phys. Rev. Letters 20, 1258 (1968) D. Cho and E. Shrauner, unpublished report
  17. R. Weiner, Nucl. Phys. B6, 226 (1968) ibid.B10, 191 (1969)
  18. Omitted endnote

  19. ([20])
  20. R. M. Weiner, unpublished report, 1967 private communication to H. J. Lipkin
  21. H. J. Lipkin, Phys. Rev. 183, 1221 (1969) Rehovoth report, 1970 (unpublished)
  22. A. Krzywicki and A. Le Yaoune, Nucl. Phys. B14, 246 (1969)
  23. Omitted endnote

  24. Omitted endnote

  25. P. Astbury et al., Phys. Letters 23, 160 (1966)
  26. K. Böckmann et al., Nuovo Cimento 42A, 954 (1966)
  27. H. J. Lipkin, F. Scheck, and H. Stern, Phys. Rev. 152, 1325 (1966)
  28. J. Franklin, Phys. Rev. 172, 1807 (1968)
  29. C. Itzykson and M. Jacob, Nuovo Cimento 48A, 909 (1967)
  30. J. Friar and J. Trefil, Nuovo Cimento 49A, 642 (1967)
  31. B. Gorczyca, Acta Phys. Polon. 33, 471 (1968)
  32. G. Cohen-Tannoudji, P. W. Salin, and A. Morel, Nuovo Cimento 55A, 412 (1968)
  33. M. Ross, Proceedings of the Regge Pole Conference, Irvine, 1969 (unpublished)
  34. P. D. B. Collins, University of Durham report, 1970 (unpublished)
  35. Omitted endnote

  36. Omitted endnote

  37. R. M. Weiner, Indiana University report, 1971 (unpublished)
  38. S. D. Drell and J. D. Sullivan, Phys. Rev. Letters 19, 268 (1967)
  39. [34], p. 185
  40. T. Bacon et al., in Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on High-Energy Physics, Dubna, 1964 (Atomizdat., Moscow, U.S.S.R., 1966), p. 697
  41. G. Fisher et al., Phys. Rev. 161, 1335 (1967)
  42. P. Astbury et al., Phys. Letters 23, 160 (1966)
  43. B. Sadoulet (private communication)
  44. R. Hagedorn, Nuovo Cimento 35, 216 (1965)
  45. [46]
  46. N. Dean, Nucl. Phys. B7, 311 (1968)
  47. Omitted endnote

  48. R. Weiner, University of Bucharest reports, 1968 (unpublished)

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation