Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Evidence on Duality and Exchange Degeneracy from Finite-Energy Sum Rules: KnπΛ and π+nK+Λ

R. D. Field, Jr and J. D. Jackson

  • Department of Physics and Lawrence Radiation Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720

Phys. Rev. D 4, 693 – Published 1 August, 1971

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.4.693

Abstract

Using finite-energy sum rules for the reactions KnπΛ and π+nK+Λ, we determine the effective "pole" parameters of the K* and K** Regge trajectories from a knowledge of the low-energy resonances and their couplings. The resonance parameters and the D(D+F) ratio for the ½+ baryon octet are varied somewhat to test the sensitivity of the high-energy predictions; ½+ octet couplings within the range of values found empirically in other reactions are preferred in our solution. We find that the s-channel resonances in KnπΛ do add in such a way as to produce predominantly real amplitudes at high energies as predicted by duality diagrams. We find, however, that these predictions are not satisfied exactly. Although the phases of both A and B are small and independent of t for |t|<0.5 (GeVc)2, the residues of the even- and odd-signature Regge poles are closely exchange-degenerate only for the B amplitudes, and not for the A amplitudes, thereby allowing an appreciable polarization for KnπΛ as is observed experimentally. The Regge-pole parameters determined from the sum rules give a good fit to the reaction KnπΛ over a wide range of energies, whereas they are unable to fit π+nK+Λ at intermediate energies. Comparison of the resonance contributions to KnπΛ and π+nK+Λ shows that "peripheral" resonances dominate the sum rules in the first reaction, while "nonperipheral" states are important in the second. By supposing that "peripheral" resonances are dual to the leading Regge singularities in the t channel, while "nonperipheral" resonances are dual to lower-lying singularities, we are led to a rationale of why the simple model of two effective Regge poles is adequate for KnπΛ even at intermediate energies, but inadequate there for π+nK+Λ.

References (40)

  1. H. Harari, Phys. Rev. Letters 22, 562 (1969)
  2. J. L. Rosner, Phys. Rev. Letters 22, 689 (1969)
  3. R. Barloutaud, Duong Nhu Hoa, J. Griselin, D. W. Merrill, J. C. Scheuer, W. Hoogland, J. C. Kluyver, A. Minguzzi-Ranzi, A. M. Rossi, B. Haber, E. Hirsch, J. Goldberg, and M. Laloum, Nucl. Phys. B9, 493 (1969)
  4. W. L. Yen, A. C. Ammann, D. D. Carmony, R. L. Eisner, A. F. Garfinkel, L. J. Gutay, S. L. Kramer, and D. H. Miller, Phys. Rev. Letters 22, 963 (1969)
  5. Kwan-Wu Lai and James Louie, Nucl. Phys. B19, 205 (1970)
  6. J. D. Jackson, Rev. Mod Phys. 42, 12 (1970)
  7. V. Singh, Phys. Rev. 129, 1889 (1963)
  8. D. Z. Freedman and J. Wang, Phys. Rev. 153, 1596 (1967)
  9. A. Barbaro-Galtieri, in Hyperon Resonances-70, edited by E. C. Fowler (Moore, Durham, N. C., 1970), p. 173
  10. P. J. Litchfield, in Hyperon Resonances-70, edited by E. C. Fowler (Moore, Durham, N. C., 1970), p. 215
  11. CERN-Heidelberg collaboration, presented by D. E. Plane in, Hyperon Resonances-70, edited by E. C. Fowler (Moore, Durham, N. C., 1970), p. 123
  12. A. Berthon, L. K. Rangan, J. Vrana, I. Butterworth, P. J. Litchfield, A. M. Segar, J. R. Smith, J. Meyer, E. Pauli, and B. Tallini, Nucl. Phys. B20, 476 (1970)
  13. G. F. Cox, G. S. Islam, D. C. Colley, D. Eastwood, J. R. Fry, F. R. Heathcote, D. J. Candlin, J. G. Colvine, G. Copley, N. E. Fancey, J. Muir, W. Angus, J. R. Campbell, W. T. Morton, P. J. Negus, S. S. Ali, I. Butterworth, F. Fuchs, D. P. Goyal, D. B. Miller, D. Pearce, and B. Schwarzschild, Nucl. Phys. B19, 61 (1970)
  14. W. S. Smart, Phys. Rev. 169, 1330 (1968) W. S. Smart, A. Kernan, G. E. Kalmus, and R. P. Ely, Phys. Rev. Letters 17, 556 (1966)
  15. J. Edwin Rush, Jr., Phys. Rev. 173, 1776 (1968) S. R. Deans, W. G. Holladay, and J. E. Rush, paper submitted to the Fourteenth International Conference on High-Energy Physics, Vienna, 1968 (unpublished)
  16. S. Orito and S. Sasaki, Lett. Nuovo Cimento 1, 936 (1969) S. Orito, Tokyo report, 1969 (unpublished)
  17. F. Wagner and C. Lovelace, Nucl. Phys. B25, 411 (1971)
  18. Particle Data Group, Rev. Mod. Phys. 42, 87 (1970)
  19. R. L. Warnock and G. Frye, Phys. Rev. 138, B947 (1965)
  20. N. Zovko, Phys. Letters 23, 143 (1966)
  21. J. K. Kim, Phys. Rev. Letters 19, 1079 (1967) C. H. Chan and F. T. Meiere, 20, 568 (1968)
  22. R. Levi-Setti, in Proceedings of the Lund International Conference on Elementary Particles, edited by G. von Dardel (Berlingska, Lund, Sweden, 1970), p. 341
  23. C. H. Chan and F. T. Meiere, Phys. Letters 28B, 125 (1968)
  24. Omitted endnote

  25. Omitted endnote

  26. Omitted endnote

  27. L. Wolfenstein, Phys. Rev. 96, 1654 (1954) E. L. Berger and G. C. Fox, Phys. Rev. Letters 25, 1783 (1970)
  28. A. D. Brody, W. B. Johnson, D. W. G. S. Leith, J. S. Loos, G. J. Luste, K. Moriyasu, B. C. Shen, W. M. Smart, F. C. Winkelmann, R. J. Yamartino, and B. Kehoe, SLAC Report No. SLAC-PUB-823, 1970 (unpublished)
  29. [G. C. Fox, in High Energy Collisions, Third International Conference held at State University of New York, Stony Brook, 1969, edited by C. N. Yang, J. A. Cole, M. Good, R. Hwa, and J. Lee-Franzini (Gordon and Breach, New York, 1969), p. 367
  30. Omitted endnote

  31. R. Dolen, D. Horn, and C. Schmid, Phys. Rev. 166, 1768 (1968)
  32. C. Schmid and J. K. Storrow, Nucl. Phys. B29, 219 (1971)
  33. M. Ferro-Luzzi, H. K. Shepard, A. Kernan, R. T. Poe, and B. C. Shen, University of California, Riverside, Report No. UCR-P107-114, 1970 (unpublished)
  34. [6]
  35. D. J. Crennell, Uri Karshon, Kwan Wu Lai, J. S. O'Neall, J. M. Scarr, R. M. Lea, T. G. Schumann, and E. M. Urvater, Phys. Rev. Letters 23, 1347 (1969)
  36. M. Abramovich, H. Blumenfeld, V. Chaloupka, S. U. Chung, J. Diaz, L. Montanet, J. Pernegr, S. Reucroft, J. Rubio, and B. Sadoulet, Nucl. Phys. B27, 477 (1971)
  37. A. Krzywicki and J. Tran Thanh Van, Phys. Letters 30B, 185 (1969)
  38. H. Harari, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 63, 432 (1971) SLAC Report No. SLAC-PUB-837, 1970 (unpublished)
  39. ([28])
  40. Chris Quigg, Ph. D. thesis, LRL Report No. UCRL-20032, 1970 (unpublished)

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation