Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Experimental study of upward-going muons in Kamiokande

Y. Oyama, K. S. Hirata, T. Kajita, T. Kifune, K. Kihara, M. Nakahata, K. Nakamura, S. Ohara, N. Sato et al.

M. Mori, A. Suzuki, K. Takahashi, T. Tanimori, and M. Yamada

M. Koshiba

T. Suda

K. Miyano, H. Miyata, and H. Takei

K. Kaneyuki, Y. Nagashima, and Y. Suzuki

E. W. Beier, L. R. Feldscher, E. D. Frank, W. Frati, S. B. Kim, A. K. Mann, F. M. Newcomer, R. Van Berg, and W. Zhang

M. Takita, Y. Totsuka, and Y. Yaginuma

  • Institute for Cosmic Ray Research, University of Tokyo, Tokyo 188, Japan

  • National Laboratory for High Energy Physics (KEK), Ibaraki 305, Japan

  • Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, Tokai University, Kanagawa 259-12, Japan

  • Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, Kobe University, Hyogo 657, Japan

  • Department of Physics, Niigata University, Niigata 950-21 Japan

  • Department of Physics, Osaka University, Osaka 560, Japan

  • Department of Physics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104

Phys. Rev. D 39, 1481 – Published 15 March, 1989

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.39.1481

Abstract

Upward-going muons produced in the surrounding rock by high-energy neutrinos from astronomical objects have been searched for using the large underground water Cherenkov detector, Kamiokande. During a total of 1255 days observation, no significant signal was observed from the direction of eight astronomical objects. The 90%-confidence-level (-C.L.) upper limits on upward-going muon fluxes with energy greater than 1.7 GeV are 9.9×1014 cm2s1 for Cygnus X-3 and 2.6×1014 cm2s1 for LMC X-4. Our observed upward-going muon flux is compared with the calculation of the upward-going muon flux produced by the atmospheric neutrinos to examine the neutrino-oscillation hypothesis. The experimental average upward-going muon flux with energy greater than 1.7 GeV, (2.05±0.18)×1013 cm2s1sr1, is consistent with the theoretical expectation. If νμντ vacuum oscillations and large mixing angle are assumed, Δm2102 eV2 is newly rejected. The 90%-C.L. upper limit on the Δm2 for the maximum mixing is found to be Δm2=0.03 eV2 and Δm2=0.0055 eV2, depending on assumptions.

References (25)

  1. D. Eichler, Nature (London) 275, 725 (1978); V. S. Berezinsky, C. Castagnoli and P. Galeotti, Nuovo Cimento 8C, 185 (1985).
  2. V. S. Berezinsky and J. P. Ostriker, Astron. Astrophys. 66, 325 (1978); H. Sato, Prog. Theor. Phys. 58, 549 (1977).
  3. Y. Oyama et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 2604 (1987).
  4. S. Danaher et al., Nature (London) 289, 568 (1981); R. C. Ramb et al., ibid. 296, 543 (1982); M. Samorsky and W. Stamm, Astrophys. J. 268, L17 (1983); J. Lloyd-Evans et al., Nature (London) 305, 784 (1983); T. Kifune et al., Astrophys. J. 301, 230 (1986).
  5. R. J. Protheroe and R. W. Clay, Nature (London) 315, 205 (1985).
  6. For a review of neutrino oscillations, see S. M. Bilenky and B. Pontecorvo, Phys. Rep. 41, 225 (1978); A. K. Mann and H. Primakoff, Phys. Rev. D 15, 655 (1977); D. Ayres et al., ibid. 29, 902 (1984); S. M. Bilenky and S. T. Petcov, Rev. Mod. Phys. 59, 671 (1987).
  7. L. Wolfenstein, Phys. Rev. D 17, 2369 (1978); S. P. Mikheyev and A. Yu. Smirnov, Nuovo Cimento 9C, 17 (1986).
  8. K. Arisaka et al., J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 54, 3213 (1985); Y. Oyama et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 991 (1986).
  9. K. Hirata et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 1490 (1987); W. Zhang et al., ibid. 61, 385 (1988); K. S. Hirata et al., Phys. Rev. D 38, 448 (1988).
  10. K. S. Hirata et al., Phys. Lett. B 205, 416 (1988).
  11. M. Honda and M. Mori, Prog. Theor. Phys. 78, 963 (1987).
  12. C. Quigg, M. H. Reno and T. P. Walker, Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 774 (1986).
  13. T. K. Gaisser and T. Stanev, Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 2265 (1985); E. K. Kolb, M. S. Turner and T. P. Walker, Phys. Rev. D 32, 1145 (1985); ibid. 33, 859(E) (1986).
  14. G. Cocconi, CERN Report No. 85-021, 1985 (unpublished).
  15. R. Svoboda et al., Astrophys. J. 315, 420 (1987).
  16. L. V. Volkova, Yad. Fiz. 31, 784 (1980) [Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 31, 1510 (1980)].
  17. R. Field and R. P. Feynman, Phys. Rev. D 15, 1590 (1977).
  18. E. Eichten, I. Hinchliffe, K. Lane and C. Quigg, Rev. Mod. Phys. 56, 579 (1984); ibid. 58, 1065(E) (1986).
  19. W. Lohmann, R. Kopp, and R. Voss, Report No. 85-03, 1985 (unpublished).
  20. T. K. Gaisser and T. Stanev, Phys. Rev. D 30, 985 (1984).
  21. F. James, Comp. Phys. Commun. 20, 29 (1980).
  22. K. Gabathuler et al., Phys. Lett. 134B, 449 (1984).
  23. F. Dydak et al., Phys. Lett. 134B, 281 (1984).
  24. J. G. Learned, S. Pakvasa and T. J. Weiler, Phys. Lett. B 207, 79 (1988); V. Barger and K. Whisnant, ibid. 209, 365 (1988); K. Hidaka, M. Honda and S. Midorikawa, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 1537 (1988); a similar analysis by the Kamiokande Collaboration is now under study.
  25. K. Mitsui, Y. Minorikawa and H. Komori, Nuovo Cimento 9C, 995 (1986).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation