Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Naked singularities and the hoop conjecture: An analytic exploration

Takashi Nakamura, Stuart L. Shapiro, and Saul A. Teukolsky

  • Center for Radiophysics and Space Research, and Departments of Astronomy and Physics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853

Phys. Rev. D 38, 2972 – Published 15 November, 1988

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.38.2972

Abstract

The formation of a naked singularity during the collapse of a finite object would pose a serious difficulty for the theory of general relativity. The hoop conjecture suggests that this possibility will never happen provided the object is sufficiently compact (≲M) in all of its spatial dimensions. But what about the collapse of a long, nonrotating, prolate object to a thin spindle? Such collapse leads to a strong singularity in Newtonian gravitation. Here we construct an analytic sequence of momentarily static, prolate, and oblate dust spheroids in full general relativity. In the limit of large eccentricity the solutions all become singular. However, when the spheroids are sufficiently large there are no apparent horizons, lending support to the hoop conjecture. These solutions thus suggest that naked singularities with matter could possibly form in asymptotically flat spacetimes.

References (12)

  1. R. Penrose, Riv. Nuovo Cimento 1, (Numero Special), 252 (1969).
  2. However, for a discussion of naked singularities related to shell crossing in spherical collapse, see P. Yodzis, H. J. Seifert and Muller zum Hagen, Commun. Math. Phys. 34, 135 (1973). Recently, A. Ori and T. Piran, Phys. Rev. Lett. K. Lake59, 2137 (1987), have presented a self-similar solution for the spherical collapse of a perfect fluid. Their solution exhibits a naked shell-focusing singularity if the equation of state is sufficiently soft. , ibid. 60, 241 (1988), has subsequently shown that the singularity is strong, in the technical sense used in general relativity. It is not known whether these solutions generalize to nonspherical collapse.
  3. S. Thorne, in Magic Without Magic: John Archibald Wheeler, edited by J. Klauder (Freeman, San Francisco, 1972), p. 1.
  4. C. C. Lin, L. Mestel and F. H. Shu, Astrophys. J. 142, 1431 (1965).
  5. C. W. Misner, K. S. Thorne, and J. A. Wheeler, Gravitation (Freeman, San Francisco, 1973), p. 867.
  6. T. Piran, in Sources of Graviational Radiation, edited by L. L. Smarr (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1979), p. 409.
  7. B. H. Voorhees, Phys. Rev. D 2, 2119 (1970).
  8. T. Nakamura and H. Sato, Prog. Theor. Phys. 68, 1396 (1982); T. Nakamura, K. Oohara and Y. Kojima, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 90, 57 (1987).
  9. D. Mihalas, Galatic Astronomy (Freeman, San Francisco, 1968), p. 195.
  10. D. Brill, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 7, 466 (1959).
  11. K. Eppley, Phys. Rev. D 16, 1609 (1977).
  12. W. B. Bonnor, Phys. Lett. 99A, 424 (1983).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation