Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

BRS and anti-BRS symmetries in the planar gauge

A. Burnel and M. Van der Rest-Jaspers

  • Physique Théorique et Mathématique, Institut de Physique au Sart Tilman (Bât. B.5), Université de l’Etat à Liège, B-4000 Liège 1, Belgium

Phys. Rev. D 38, 2579 – Published 15 October, 1988

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.38.2579

Abstract

The planar gauge is reexamined from various points of view. First, we find an annoying ambiguity in the definition of the product of two propagators. Second, Becchi-Rouet-Stora (BRS) invariance can be implemented only at the price of unavoidable second-order derivatives in the Lagrangian. BRS and anti-BRS symmetries cannot be realized simultaneously. If, instead of BRS, anti-BRS symmetry is implemented, the ambiguity does not give rise to different results. There is some simplification in the calculation but the gluon self-energy is neither conserved nor orthogonal to n. Again, second-order derivatives are unavoidable in the invariant Lagrangian. For all these reasons, the planar gauge with its usual propagator either with BRS or with anti-BRS symmetry does not seem to be a true gauge for Yang-Mills theory.

References (17)

  1. Yu. L. Dokshitzer, D. I. D'Yakonov and S. I. Trojan, Phys. Rep. 58, 269 (1980).
  2. A. Andrasi and J. C. Taylor, Nucl. Phys. B192, 283 (1981).
  3. H. Cheng and T. S. Tsai, Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 511 (1986).
  4. A. Burnel, Phys. Rev. D 36, 1852 (1987).
  5. H. Cheng and T. S. Tsai, Phys. Rev. D 34, 3858 (1986).
  6. C. Becchi, A. Rouet and R. Stora, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 98, 287 (1976).
  7. G. Curci and R. Ferrari, Nuovo Cimento 31A, 151 (1976).
  8. L. Baulieu, Phys. Rep. 129, 1 (1985); L. Baulieu and J. Thierry-Mieg, Nucl. Phys. B197, 477 (1982).
  9. N. Nakanishi, Phys. Rev. D 5, 1324 (1971); B. Lautrup, K. Dan. Vidensk. Selsk. Mat. Fys. Medd. 35, 11 (1967). See also A. Burnel and H. Caprasse, Nucl. Phys. B5, 93 (1968).
  10. G. Leibbrandt, Rev. Mod. Phys. 57, 1067 (1987).
  11. S. N. Gupta, Proc. Phys. Soc. (London) A63, 681 (1950); K. Bleuler, Helv. Phys. Acta 23, 567 (1950).
  12. N. Nakanishi, Prog. Theor. Phys. 67, 965 (1982); A. Burnel and M. Van der Rest-Jaspers, Phys. Rev. D 28, 3121 (1983); A. Burnel, ibid. 36, 1846 (1987).
  13. A. Burnel, Nucl. Phys. B198, 531 (1982).
  14. D. M. Capper and G. Leibbrandt, Phys. Rev. D 25, 1002 (1982).
  15. G. Leibbrandt, Rev. Mod. Phys. 47, 849 (1975).
  16. W. Kummer, Phys. Rev. D 37, 454 (1988).
  17. P. Gaigg, O. Piguet, A. Rebhan and M. Schweba, Phys. Lett. B 175, 53 (1986).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation