Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Prospects for a day-night Cl37 solar-neutrino oscillation experiment

M. L. Cherry and K. Lande

  • Departments of Physics and Astronomy, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104

Phys. Rev. D 36, 3571 – Published 15 December, 1987

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.36.3571

Abstract

If neutrino oscillations in the solar interior are responsible for the suppressed B8 solar-neutrino flux measured by the Homestake Cl37 detector, then for certain values of neutrino mass difference and mixing angle, distinct day-night differences in the counting rate are expected due to propagation effects in the Earth. We describe the plans to measure day-night variations with the Cl37 detector, and present the results of calculations of Cl37 detector sensitivity and expected results.

References (13)

  1. R. Davis, Jr., in Proceedings of the Seventh Workshop on Grand Unification, ICOBAN '86, Toyama, Japan (World Scientific, Singapore, 1986).
  2. J. K. Rowley et al., in Solar Neutrinos and Neutrino Astronomy, proceedings of a Conference, Lead, South Dakota, 1984, edited by M. L. Cherry et al. (AIP Conf. Proc. No. 126) (AIP, New York, 1985), p. 1.
  3. J. N. Bahcall et al., Astrophys. J. Lett. 292, L79 (1985).
  4. J. N. Bahcall, presented at the Thirteenth Texas Symposium on Relativistic Astrophysics, Chicago, Illinois, 1986 (unpublished); J. N. Bahcall and R. Ulrich (private communication).
  5. S. P. Mikheyev and A. Y. Smirnov, Yad. Fiz. 42, 1441 (1985) [Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 42, 913 (1985)]; L. Wolfenstein, Phys. Rev. D 17, 2369 (1978); ibid. 20, 2634 (1979).
  6. H. A. Bethe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 1305 (1986); S. P. Rosen and J. M. Gelb, Phys. Rev. D 34, 969 (1986).
  7. A. Baltz and J. Weneser, Phys. Rev. D 35, 528 (1987); M. Cribier et al., Phys. Lett. B 182, 89 (1986); , ibid. 188, 168 (1987); J. Bouchez et al., Z. Phys. C 32, 499 (1986).
  8. S. J. Parke and T. P. Walker, Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 2322 (1986).
  9. The more complicated case of three neutrinos is discussed by T. K. Kuo and J. Pantaleone, Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 1805 (1986).
  10. J. N. Bahcall, Rev. Mod. Phys. 50, 881 (1978).
  11. V. Barger et al., Phys. Rev. D 34, 980 (1986); A. Dar and A. Mann, Nature (London) 325, 790 (1987); W. Hampel, in Weak and Electromagnetic Interactions in Nuclei, proceedings of the International Symposium, Heidelberg, West Germany, 1986, edited by H. V. Klapdor (Springer, New York, 1987); W. C. Haxton, Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 1271 (1987); E. W. Kolb et al., Phys. Lett. B 175, 478 (1986); P. Langacker et al., Nucl. Phys. B282, 589 (1987); S. J. Parke, Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 1275 (1986); L. Wolfenstein, Carnegie-Mellon Report No. CMU-HEP 86-7, 1986 (unpublished).
  12. A. H. Cook, Physics of the Earth and Planets (Wiley, New York, 1973).
  13. B. T. Cleveland, Nucl. Instrum. Methods 214, 451 (1983).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation