Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Gravitational amplification and attenuation as part of the mutual interaction of quantum fields in curved space-times

Jürgen Audretsch

Peter Spangehl

  • Fakultät für Physik, Universität Konstanz, Postfach 5560, D-7750 Konstanz, West Germany

  • Siemens AG, Hofmannstrasse 51, D-8000 München, West Germany

Phys. Rev. D 33, 997 – Published 15 February, 1986

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.33.997

Abstract

We continue our study of quantum field theory of mutually interacting fields in a given unquantized curved background space-time. The mean value of the particle number operator is discussed in the interaction picture using an in-out scheme (S-matrix approach). For free fields there is a gravitational amplification (for bosons) or attenuation (for fermions) of the ingoing particle content which adds in the out region to the particles created out of the vacuum. In case there is an additional mutual interaction between fields, a similar amplification or attenuation of the particles coming out of the mutual interaction is found. A massive conformally coupled scalar field φ in a Robertson-Walker universe shows amplification; a massless field ψ does not. As case studies we give for a particular expansion law a mathematically rigorous calculation of the ‘‘Compton effect’’ in lowest order of the φ2ψ2 interaction and of the particle creation out of the vacuum in the φψ model. The ‘‘Compton effect’’ in exact energy-momentum conservation goes solely back to the amplification term, thus giving an operational physical meaning to this concept: The number of outgoing massive φ particles is not equal to but greater than the corresponding number of massless ψ particles. The case of vac- uum creation on the other hand represents an example in which the amplification term is accompanied by an additional term of comparable magnitude.

References (12)

  1. N. D. Birrell, in Quantum Gravity, edited by C. J. Isham, R. Penrose, and D. W. Sciama (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1981).
  2. N. J. Papastamatiou and L. Parker, Phys. Rev. D 19, 2283 (1979).
  3. N. D. Birrell, P. C. W. Davies, and L. H. Ford, J. Phys. A 13, 961 (1980); L. H. Ford, Nucl. Phys. B204, 35 (1982).
  4. K. H. Lotze, Class. Quantum Grav. 2, 354 (1985); ibid. 2, 366 (1985).
  5. J. Audretsch and P. Spangehl, Class. Quantum Grav. 2, 733 (1985).
  6. L. Parker, Phys. Rev. 183, 1057 (1969); Phys. Rev. D 3, 346 (1971).
  7. Inspection shows that for a mutual interaction scrLIapp λ φMψN terms in odd powers of lambda can appear in the particle number mean value (2.4) if and only if M and N both are even (including zero).
  8. Amplification and attenuation in the sense we have used it has nothing to do with superradiance as discussed in Kerr black-hole physics by J. Bekenstein, Phys. Rev. D 7, 949 (1979); and W. Press and S. Teukolsky, Nature (London) 238, 211 (1972).
  9. As a precaution we stress that the details of the arguments used below may depend on the particular structure of a( η ).
  10. The Eqs. (5.14), (5.16), and (5.19) in paper I correspond to the Eqs. (4.10) and (4.11) here.
  11. L. Parker, Nature (London) 261, 20 (1976); in Asymptotic Structure of Space-Time, edited by F. P. Esposito and L. Witten (Plenum, New York, 1977).
  12. For a particular interaction and a particular process it has been demonstrated by Lotze (Ref. 4) that there is an attenuation in the fermionic case according to the first term in (A4).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation