Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Quasi-Riemannian gravity and spontaneous breaking of the Lorentz gauge symmetry in more than four dimensions

M. Gasperini

  • Istituto di Fisica Teorica dell’Università, Corso M.D’Azeglio, 46-10125 Torino, Italy and Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Torino, Italy

Phys. Rev. D 33, 3594 – Published 15 June, 1986

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.33.3594

Abstract

It is shown that a pure gravity theory in d dimensions, with an action quadratic in torsion and curvature, may lead to a spontaneous breaking of the SO(1,d-1) gauge symmetry. The physical vacuum, corresponding to a minimum of the self-interaction torsion potential, is characterized by a constant nonvanishing torsion background, and in the lowest-order expansion of the gravitational field around this configuration, an effective quasi-Riemannian theory is obtained. In particular, all nine parameters of the corresponding quasi-Riemannian action are determined, as a function of the torsion self-interaction coupling strength, for the tangent space groups SO(1,d-4)×SO(3) and SO(1,d-2). Finally, the possibility that a breaking of the local Lorentz symmetry may be associated to a change of sign of the effective four-dimensional gravitational coupling constant is discussed.

References (24)

  1. S. Weinberg, Phys. Lett. 138B, 47 (1984).
  2. K. S. Viswanathan and B. Wong, Phys. Lett. 151B, 407 (1985).
  3. S. P. de Alwis and S. Randjbar-Daemi, Phys. Rev. D 32, 1345 (1985).
  4. S. Randjbar-Daemi, A. Salam and J. Strathdee, Nucl. Phys. B214, 491 (1983).
  5. C. Wetterich, Nucl. Phys. B252, 473 (1984).
  6. R. L. Mallet, Phys. Rev. D 13, 2691 (1976).
  7. See, for example, M. J. Duff, Report No. CERN TH.4243/85, 1985 (unpublished).
  8. F. W. Hehl, in Spin, Torsion, Rotation and Supergravity, edited by P. G. Bergmann and V. De Sabbata (Plenum, New York, 1980), p. 5.
  9. Q. Shafi and C. Wetterich, Phys. Lett. 129B, 387 (1983).
  10. P. Candelas, G. Horowitz, A. Strominger and E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B258, 46 (1985).
  11. B. Zwiebach, Phys. Lett. 156B, 315 (1985).
  12. R. I. Nepomechie, University of Washington Report No. 40048-21 P5, 1985 (unpublished).
  13. J. Madore, Phys. Lett. 110A, 289 (1985).
  14. F. Müller-Hoissen, Phys. Lett. 163B, 106 (1985).
  15. F. Müller-Hoissen, Max-Planck Institute Report No. MPI-PAE/PTh 62/82, 1985 (unpublished).
  16. The possible torsion contributions in determining the ground-state geometry were first considered by C. Destri, C. A. Orzalesi, and P. Rossi [Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 147, 321 (1983)] and recently discussed by B. McInnes [ICTP Report No. IC/85/58, 1985 (unpublished)].
  17. T. Curtwright and C. Zachos, Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 1799 (1984); see also I. Bars, Phys. Rev. D 33, 383 (1986).
  18. L. J. Romans and N. P. Warner, California Institute of Technology Report No. CALT-68-1291, 1985 (unpublished).
  19. R. I. Nepomechie and A. Zee, Phys. Lett. 158B, 311 (1985).
  20. I. Y. Aref'Eva and I. V. Volovich, Phys. Lett. 158B, 31 (1985).
  21. O. Foda and J. A. Helayël-Neto, ICTP Report No. IC/85/64, 1985 (unpublished).
  22. S. Deser, Brandeis University Report No. BRX TH-195, 1985 (unpublished).
  23. A. D. Linde, Phys. Lett. 93B, 394 (1980).
  24. M. Gasperini, Phys. Lett. 163B, 84 (1985).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation