Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Quantum stress-energy tensors and the weak energy condition

Thomas A. Roman

  • Department of Physics/Earth Sciences, Central Connecticut State University, New Britain, Connecticut 06050 and Department of Mathematics, Physics and Computer Science, University of Hartford, West Hartford, Connecticut 06117

Phys. Rev. D 33, 3526 – Published 15 June, 1986

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.33.3526

Abstract

Certain processes predicted by quantum field theory, such as the Hawking black-hole evaporation process and radiation by moving mirrors, involve stress-energy tensors which exhibit peculiar properties from the classical point of view. More specifically, these stress-energy tensors do not obey the weak energy condition because they involve negative-energy densities and we show that, as a result, they are nondiagonalizable by a local Lorentz transformation under certain circumstances. In addition, we show that TabUaUb is not bounded below for all unit timelike vectors Ua and that this is also a property of the stress-energy tensor associated with the Casimir effect. These observations are important in view of the fact that Tipler has shown that if Tab is diagonalizable (type I) and if TabUaUb is bounded below, then the weak energy condition is the weakest energy condition that can be defined locally. One might conjecture that the existence of similar (although as yet unknown) quantum processes, in which the weak energy condition is violated locally, could prevent the eventual formation of a singularity in the gravitational collapse of a star. Although we do not present a specific model, it is possible that in such a process the weak energy condition, while violated locally, would still hold on the average. Extending earlier results of Tipler, we show that Penrose’s singularity theorem will still hold if the weak energy condition is replaced by a weaker (nonlocal) energy condition and if the null generic condition holds.

References (24)

  1. S. W. Hawking and G. F. R. Ellis, The Large Scale Structure of Spacetime (Cambridge University Press, London, 1973).
  2. F. J. Tipler, Phys. Rev. D 17, 2521 (1978).
  3. F. J. Tipler, J. Diff. Equ. 30, 165 (1978).
  4. R. Penrose, Phys. Rev. Lett. 14, 57 (1965).
  5. S. W. Hawking, Commun. Math. Phys. 43, 199 (1975).
  6. P. C. W. Davies, S. A. Fulling and W. G. Unruh, Phys. Rev. D 13, 2720 (1976).
  7. P. Candelas, Phys. Rev. D 21, 2185 (1980).
  8. S. A. Fulling and P. C. W. Davies, Proc. R. Soc. London A 348, 393 (1976); P. C. W. Davies and S. A. Fulling, ibid. A 356, 237 (1977).
  9. L. H. Ford, Proc. R. Soc. London A 364, 227 (1978); P. C. W. Davies, Phys. Lett. 113 B, 215 (1982).
  10. W. G. Unruh and R. M. Wald, Phys. Rev. D 25, 942 (1982).
  11. T. A. Roman and P. G. Bergmann, Phys. Rev. D 28, 1265 (1983).
  12. R. Balbinot and R. Bergamini, Nuovo Cimento 68 B, 104 (1982); W. A. Hiscock, Phys. Rev. D 23, 2813 (1981).
  13. P. Hajicek and W. Israel, Phys. Lett. 80 A, 9 (1980); J. York, Jr., in Quantum Theory of Gravity, edited by S. M. Christensen (Hilger, Bristol, 1983), pp. 135–147.
  14. I. D. Novikov, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 71, 393 (1976) [Sov. Phys. JETP 44, 207 (1976)].
  15. R. Balbinot, Phys. Lett. 136 B, 337 (1984).
  16. R. Balbinot and M. Brown, Phys. Lett. 100 A, 80 (1984).
  17. S. A. Fulling, Phys. Rev. D 15, 2411 (1977).
  18. L. Landau and E. Lifshitz, The Classical Theory of Fields, 4th ed. (Pergamon, Aberdeen, 1979).
  19. D. Deutsch, A. C. Ottewill and D. W. Sciama, Phys. Lett. 119 B, 72 (1982).
  20. The author is indebted to P. G. Bergmann for this example.
  21. B. DeWitt, in General Relativity: An Einstein Centenary Survey, edited by S. W. Hawking and W. Israel (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1979), pp. 680–745; see also L. Ford, Ph.D. thesis, Princeton University, 1974.
  22. R. Wald, General Relativity (The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1984), p. 410.
  23. R. Penrose, in Theoretical Principles in Astrophysics and Relativity, edited by N. R. Lebovitz, W. H. Reid, and P. O. Vandervoort (The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1978), p. 229.
  24. A. Einstein, The Meaning of Relativity, 5th ed. (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1970), p. 129.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation