Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Membrane viewpoint on black holes: Dynamical electromagnetic fields near the horizon

Douglas A. Macdonald and Wai-Mo Suen

  • Theoretical Astrophysics and Gravitation, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125

Phys. Rev. D 32, 848 – Published 15 August, 1985

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.32.848

Abstract

This paper is part of a series of papers with the aim of developing a complete self-consistent formalism for the treatment of electromagnetic and gravitational fields in the neighborhood of a black-hole horizon. In this membrane formalism, the horizon is treated as a closed two-dimensional membrane lying in a curved three-dimensional space, and endowed with familiar physical properties such as entropy and temperature, surface pressure and viscosity, and electrical conductivity, charge, and current. This paper develops the concept of the ‘‘stretched horizon,’’ which will be vital for both the electromagnetic and gravitational aspects of the formalism, and it presents several model problems illustrating the interaction of dynamical electromagnetic fields with stationary black-hole horizons: The field of a test charge in various states of motion outside the Schwarzschild horizon is analyzed in the near-horizon limit, where the spatial curvature may be ignored and the metric may be approximated by that of Rindler. This analysis elucidates the influence of the horizon on the shapes and motions of electric and magnetic field lines when external agents move the field lines in arbitrary manners. It also illustrates how the field lines interact with the horizon’s charge and current to produce an exchange of energy and momentum between the external agent and the horizon. A numerical calculation of the dynamical relaxation of a magnetic field threading a Schwarzschild black hole is also presented, illustrating the ‘‘cleaning’’ of a complicated field structure by a black-hole horizon, and elucidating the constraints on the location of the stretched horizon.

References (41)

  1. J. D. Bekenstein, Ph.D. thesis, Princeton University, 1972.
  2. S. W. Hawking, Commun. Math. Phys. 25, 152 (1972).
  3. S. W. Hawking and J. B. Hartle, Commun. Math. Phys. 27, 283 (1972).
  4. J. D. Bekenstein, Phys. Rev. D 7, 2333 (1973).
  5. S. W. Hawking, Commun. Math. Phys. 43, 199 (1975).
  6. J. B. Hartle, Phys. Rev. D 8, 1010 (1973).
  7. J. B. Hartle, Phys. Rev. D 9, 2749 (1974).
  8. R. L. Znajek, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 185, 833 (1978).
  9. T. Damour, Phys. Rev. D 18, 3598 (1978).
  10. T. Damour, in Proceedings of the Second Marcel Grossman Meeting on General Relativity, edited by R. Ruffini (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1982); also for more detail, T. Damour, the`se de doctorat d'état (Ph.D. thesis), l'Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, 1979.
  11. C. W. Misner, K. S. Thorne, and J. A. Wheeler, Gravitation (Freeman, San Francisco, 1973); cited in text as MTW.
  12. Black Holes, edited by C. DeWitt and B. DeWitt (Gordon and Breach, New York, 1973).
  13. K. S. Thorne and D. A. Macdonald, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 198, 339 (1982); cited in text as TM.
  14. D. A. Macdonald and K. S. Thorne, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 198, 345 (1982); cited in text as MT.
  15. R. D. Blandford and R. L. Znajek, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 179, 433 (1977).
  16. R. H. Price and K. S. Thorne, in preparation.
  17. W.-M. Suen, R. H. Price, and I. H. Redmount, in preparation.
  18. K. S. Thorne, R. H. Price, W.-M. Suen, D. A. Macdonald, I. H. Redmount, R. J. Crowley, and X.-H. Zhang, in preparation.
  19. W. Rindler, Am. J. Phys. 34, 1174 (1966).
  20. J. M. Bardeen, W. H. Press and S. A. Teukolsky, Astrophys. J. 178, 347 (1973).
  21. B. Carter, in General Relativity, An Einstein Centenary Survey, edited by S. W. Hawking and W. Israel (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1979).
  22. D. Christodoulou and R. Ruffini, in Black Holes, edited by C. DeWitt and B. DeWitt (Gordon and Breach, New York, 1973).
  23. J. M. Bardeen, B. Carter and S. W. Hawking, Commun. Math. Phys. 31, 161 (1973).
  24. B. S. DeWitt and R. W. Brehme, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 9, 220 (1960).
  25. A. G. Smith and C. M. Will, Phys. Rev. D 22, 1276 (1980).
  26. W. G. Unruh, Phys. Rev. D 14, 870 (1976).
  27. See, for example, J. D. Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics, 2nd ed. (Wiley, New York, 1975).
  28. T. C. Bradbury, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 19, 323 (1962); D. G. Boulware, ibid. 124, 169 (1980); M. Soffel, B. Müller and W. Greiner, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 12, 287 (1980).
  29. R. S. Hanni and R. Ruffini, Phys. Rev. D 8, 3259 (1973).
  30. E. T. Copson, Proc. R. Soc. London A118, 184 (1928); B. Linet, J. Phys. A 9, 1081 (1976).
  31. T. Regge and J. A. Wheeler, Phys. Rev. 108, 1063 (1957).
  32. R. M. Wald, Phys. Rev. D 10, 1680 (1974).
  33. R. S. Hanni and R. Ruffini, Lett. Nuovo Cimento 15, 189 (1976).
  34. See, for example, T. G. Cowling, Magnetohydrodynamics (Interscience, New York, 1957).
  35. W. H. Press, Astrophys. J. 170, L105 (1971).
  36. C. J. Goebel, Astrophys. J. 172, L95 (1972).
  37. A. R. King, J. P. Lasota and W. Kundt, Phys. Rev. D 12, 3037 (1975).
  38. E. S. Phinney, in Proceedings of the Torino Workshop on Astrophysical Jets, edited by A. Ferrari and A. G. Pacholczyk (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1983).
  39. W. H. Press, Astrophys. J. 175, 243 (1972).
  40. A. R. King and J. P. Lasota, Astron. Astrophys. 58, 175 (1977).
  41. P. A. M. Dirac, Proc. R. Soc. London, A167, 148 (1938); also problem 17.4 of Ref. 27.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation