- Access by Xinjiang University
Soliton bag models of hadrons from QCD
Phys. Rev. D 32, 2419 – Published 1 November, 1985
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.32.2419
Abstract
Several phenomenological models of hadrons are derived from quantum chromodynamics (QCD). Functional-integral methods are used to obtain an approximate bilocal-field representation of the QCD generating functional. The degenerate vacuum configurations of the action for the bilocal fields have a rich topological structure arising from the dynamically broken chiral symmetry. Restricting the bilocal-field fluctuations to those of local fields results in a local-field bosonization of QCD, from which we obtain values for several meson parameters. A nontopological-soliton ansatz for hadronic states leads to a generalized bag-model action which as special cases contains the chiral-bag-model action and the MIT-bag-model action. All parameters in these actions are calculable and in particular the MIT bag constant is calculated. This work extends our previous calculation of the bag constant.
References (19)
- W. Marciano and H. Pagels, Phys. Rep. 36C, 137 (1978).
- A. Chodos, R. L. Jaffe, K. Johnson, C. B. Thorn and V. F. Weisskopf, Phys. Rev. D 9, 3471 (1974); A. Chodos, R. L. Jaffe, K. Johnson and C. B. Thorn, ibid. 10, 2599 (1974); T. De Grand, R. L. Jaffe, K. Johnson and J. Kiskis, ibid. 12, 2060 (1975).
- G. A. Miller, A. W. Thomas and S. Théberge, Phys. Lett. 91B, 192 (1980); S. Théberge, A. W. Thomas and G. A. Miller, Phys. Rev. D 22, 2838 (1980); A. W. Thomas, S. Théberge and G. A. Miller, ibid. 24, 216 (1981); A. W. Thomas, in Advances in Nuclear Physics, edited by J. Negele and E. Vogt (Plenum, New York, 1983), Vol. 13.
- G. S. Adkins, C. R. Nappi and E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B228, 552 (1983); G. S. Adkins and C. R. Nappi, Phys. Lett. 137B, 251 (1984); T. H. R. Skyrme, Proc. R. Soc. London A260, 127 (1961).
- H. J. Munczek and A. M. Nemirovsky, Phys. Rev. D 28, 181 (1983).
- D. J. Gross and F. Wilczek, Phys. Rev. Lett. 30, 1323 (1973); H. D. Politzer, ibid. 30, 1346 (1973).
- H. Kleinert, Phys. Lett. 62B, 429 (1976).
- E. Shrauner, Phys. Rev. D 16, 1887 (1977).
- H. Pagels, Phys. Rev. D 14, 2747 (1976); Y. Nambu and G. Jona-Lasinio, Phys. Rev. 122, 345 (1961); ibid. 124, 246 (1961).
- H. Pagels and S. Stokar, Phys. Rev. D 20, 2947 (1979).
- R. Friedberg and T. D. Lee, Phys. Rev. D 15, 1694 (1977); ibid. 16, 1096 (1977); ibid. 18, 2623 (1978).
- R. T. Cahill and A. G. Williams, Phys. Rev. D 28, 2599 (1983).
- A. G. Williams and R. T. Cahill, Phys. Rev. D 28, 1966 (1983).
- A. G. Williams and R. T. Cahill, Phys. Rev. D 30, 391 (1984).
- R. Goldflam and L. Wilets, Phys. Rev. D 25, 1951 (1983).
- R. T. Cahill, C. D. Roberts, and A. G. Williams, Report No. FIAS-R-122, 1983 (unpublished)
- M. C. Birse and M. K. Banerjee, Phys. Lett. 136, B, 284 (1984).
- M. Rho, A. S. Goldhaber and G. E. Brown, Phys. Rev. Lett. 51, 747 (1983); A. D. Jackson and M. Rho, ibid. 51, 751 (1983).
- M. A. Shifman, A. I. Vainshtein and Z. I. Zakharov, Nucl. Phys. B147, 385 (1979).