Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Evolution equation and relativistic bound-state wave functions for scalar-field models in four and six dimensions

Stanley J. Brodsky, Chueng-Ryong Ji, and Mikolaj Sawicki

  • Stanford Linear Accelerator Center, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305

Phys. Rev. D 32, 1530 – Published 15 September, 1985

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.32.1530

Abstract

We investigate the evolution equation for distribution amplitudes in the framework of a scalar theory quantized on the light cone. We find general solutions for the cases of 4 and 6 dimensions and use them to reconstruct two-body relativistic bound-state wave functions at small distances. The relation between the light-cone bound-state equation and the Bethe-Salpeter equation is discussed.

References (13)

  1. P. M. Mackenzie, in Gauge Theory on a Lattice: 1984, proceedings of the Argonne National Laboratory Workshop, edited by C. Zachos, W. Celmaster, E. Kovacs, and D. Sivers (National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA, 1984); B. Velikson and D. Weingarten, Nucl. Phys. B 249, 433 (1985); A. S. Kronfeld and D. M. Photiadis, Phys. Rev. D 31, 2939 (1985).
  2. P. A. M. Dirac, Rev. Mod. Phys. 21, 392 (1949); S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. 150, 1313 (1966); L. Susskind and G. Frye, ibid. 165, 1535 (1968); J. B. Kogut and D. E. Soper, Phys. Rev. D 1, 2901 (1970); J. D. Bjorken, J. B. Kogut and D. E. Soper, ibid. 3, 1382 (1971); S. J. Brodsky, R. Roskies and R. Suaya, ibid. 8, 4574 (1973); G. P. Lepage, S. J. Brodsky, T. Huang, and P. M. Mackenzie, in Particles and Fields—2, proceedings of the Banff Summer Institute, Banff, Canada, 1981, edited by A. Z. Capri, and A. N. Kamal (Plenum, New York, 1983).
  3. V. A. Karmanov, Nucl. Phys. B 166, 378 (1979); ibid. A 362, 331 (1981).
  4. G. P. Lepage and S. J. Brodsky, Phys. Rev. D 22, 2157 (1980).
  5. T. Appelquist and E. Poggio, Phys. Rev. D 10, 3280 (1974).
  6. G. C. Wick, Phys. Rev. 96, 1124 (1954).
  7. R. E. Cutkosky, Phys. Rev. 96, 1135 (1954).
  8. N. Nakanishi, Suppl. Prog. Theor. Phys. 43, 1 (1969).
  9. A possible interpretation for such an increase of the coupling constant is that due to an absence of the higher sectors in the LCLA kernel as compared to the light-cone projection of the Wick-Cutkosky model, the LCLA kernel lacks attraction and the coupling constant has to be increased to provide required binding. See M. Sawicki (unpublished).
  10. Lepage et al. in Ref. 2
  11. S. J. Brodsky, in Quarks and Nuclear Forces, edited by D. Fries and B. Zeitnitz (Springer Tracts in Modern Physics, Vol. 100) (Springer, Berlin, 1982), p. 81.
  12. C. Itzykson and J. B. Zuber, Quantum-Field Theory (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1980), Chaps. 10–12.
  13. M. G. Schmidt, Phys. Rev. D 9, 408 (1974).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation