Conspiracy versus Regge Cuts in <span class="aps-inline-formula"><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mrow><msup><mrow><mi>π</mi></mrow><mrow><mo>−</mo></mrow></msup></mrow><mi>p</mi></math></span> Charge Exchange

Ronald W. Hanson

doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.3.2225

Access by Xinjiang University

Conspiracy versus Regge Cuts in $π^{-} p$ Charge Exchange

Ronald W. Hanson^*

Department of Physics, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85281

^*National Defense Education Act Title IV Graduate Fellow.

PDF

Phys. Rev. D 3, 2225 – Published 1 May, 1971

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.3.2225

Abstract

A phenomenological study of $π^{-} p$ charge-exchange differential cross section and polarization is made using the $ρ$ plus a conspiring $ρ^{'}$ and using the $ρ$ plus an absorptive cut. In both cases the Regge residues are taken to have the Veneziano form $\frac{const}{Γ (α)}$ . The conspiracy model is found to agree with the data considerably better than the cut model.

Comments & Replies

Do Regge Pole-Cuts Account for $Δ σ_{T} (π p) ?$

Ronald W. Hanson

Phys. Rev. D 5, 1227 (1972)

References (9)

L. Sertorio and M. Toller, Phys. Rev. Letters 19, 1146 (1967)
Akbar Ahmadzadeh and Jane C. Jackson, Phys. Rev. 187, 2078 (1969)
Akbar Ahmadzadeh and William B. Kaufmann, Phys. Rev. 188, 2438 (1969)
F. Henyey, G. L. Kane, Jon Pumplin, and M. H. Ross, Phys. Rev. 182, 1579 (1969)
M. H. Ross, in Proceedings of the Regge Pole Conference, University of California at Irvine, 1969 (unpublished)
P. Sonderegger et al., Phys. Letters 20, 75 (1966) M. A. Wahlig and I. Mannelli, Phys. Rev. 168, 1515 (1968)
P. Bonamy et al., Phys. Letters 23, 501 (1966) J. Schneider (private communication)
Richard C. Arnold and Maurice L. Blackmon, Phys. Rev. 176, 2082 (1968)
Bipin R. Desai et al., Phys. Rev. Letters 25, 1389 (1970)

[c1] L. Sertorio and M. Toller, Phys. Rev. Letters 19, 1146 (1967)

[c2] Akbar Ahmadzadeh and Jane C. Jackson, Phys. Rev. 187, 2078 (1969)

[c3] Akbar Ahmadzadeh and William B. Kaufmann, Phys. Rev. 188, 2438 (1969)

[c4] F. Henyey, G. L. Kane, Jon Pumplin, and M. H. Ross, Phys. Rev. 182, 1579 (1969)

[c5] M. H. Ross, in Proceedings of the Regge Pole Conference, University of California at Irvine, 1969 (unpublished)

[c6] P. Sonderegger et al., Phys. Letters 20, 75 (1966) M. A. Wahlig and I. Mannelli, Phys. Rev. 168, 1515 (1968)

[c7] P. Bonamy et al., Phys. Letters 23, 501 (1966) J. Schneider (private communication)

[c8] Richard C. Arnold and Maurice L. Blackmon, Phys. Rev. 176, 2082 (1968)

[c9] Bipin R. Desai et al., Phys. Rev. Letters 25, 1389 (1970)

Physical Review D

Export citation

Export citation

Conspiracy versus Regge Cuts in $π^{-} p$ Charge Exchange

Abstract

Comments & Replies

Do Regge Pole-Cuts Account for $Δ σ_{T} (π p) ?$

References (9)

Outline

Information

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation

Conspiracy versus Regge Cuts in π−p Charge Exchange

Abstract

Comments & Replies

Do Regge Pole-Cuts Account for ΔσT(πp)?

References (9)

Conspiracy versus Regge Cuts in $π^{-} p$ Charge Exchange

Do Regge Pole-Cuts Account for $Δ σ_{T} (π p) ?$