- Access by Xinjiang University
Asymptotics of Partial Waves in Regge Theory and Constraints on Partial-Wave Subtraction Constants
Phys. Rev. D 3, 1429 – Published 15 March, 1971
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.3.1429
Abstract
In a Regge theory of spinless elastic scattering, subtraction constants in physical partial waves are not always free parameters. In a partial wave where there is no Castillejo-Dalitz-Dyson (CDD) pole, the subtraction constant , , is uniquely determined when the left-cut term and the elasticity are specified. If there are CDD poles, all at finite points, then the subtraction constant is again fixed uniquely, but its value depends on the CDD parameters. If there is a CDD pole at infinity, the subtraction constant is unconstrained. These results are proved assuming that high-energy behavior is determined by a moving Pomeranchuk pole, with or without associated branch points. The analysis, although model independent, has implications for a dynamical model based on Reggeon exchange—namely, a model in which the input to the inelastic equation (left- and right-cut parts) is constructed from crossed-channel Regge terms. In such a model the equation is a regular Fredholm equation without high-energy truncation. In general, the phase shift obtained as output from the equation has the high-energy behavior required by Regge theory if, and only if, the subtraction-constant constraint is satisfied. It is argued that new calculations are needed to test the Reggeon-exchange model. Earlier calculations in the Chew-Jones scheme are not conclusive for the formulation given here.
References (22)
- R. L. Warnock, in Lectures in Theoretical High-Energy Physics, edited by H. H. Aly (Interscience, New York, 1968), Chap. 10
Omitted endnote
- G. Frye and R. L. Warnock, Phys. Rev. 130, 478 (1963)
- G. F. Chew and S. Mandelstam, Phys. Rev. 119, 467 (1960)
- D. Atkinson and A. P. Contogouris, J. Math. Phys. 9, 1489 (1968)
- G. F. Chew, Phys. Rev. 129, 2363 (1963) G. F. Chew and C. E. Jones, ibid. 135, B208 (1964)
- P. D. B. Collins and V. L. Teplitz, Phys. Rev. 140, B663 (1965)
- P. D. B. Collins, Phys. Rev. 142, 1163 (1966)
- F. Zachariasen and C. Zemach, Phys. Rev. 128, 849 (1962)
- Chan Hong-Mo, P. C. Decelles, and J. E. Paton, Nuovo Cimento 33, 70 (1964)
- J. Fulco, G. Shaw, and D. Wong, Phys. Rev. 137, B1242 (1965)
- S. K. Gupta, Ph.D. Dissertation, Illinois Institute of Technology, 1967 (unpublished)
- Chan Hong-Mo and C. Wilkin, Ann. Phys. (N. Y.) 39, 300 (1966)
- D. Atkinson, K. Dietz, and D. Morgan, Ann. Phys. (N. Y.) 37, 77 (1966) J. B. Hartle and C. E. Jones, ibid. 38, 348 (1966)
- S. Mandelstam, Phys. Rev. 137, B949 (1965)
- D. Atkinson and R. L. Warnock, Phys. Rev. 188, 2098 (1969) ([14])
- P. D. B. Collins and R. C. Johnson, Phys. Rev. 177, 2472 (1969) ibid.182, 1755 (1969) R. C. Johnson and P. D. B. Collins, ibid. 185, 2020 (1969)
- B. Webber, LRL Report No. UCRL-20134 (unpublished)
- G. F. Chew (private communication)
- J. Bros, H. Epstein, and V. Glaser, Nuovo Cimento 31, 1265 (1964)
Omitted endnote
- G. R. Bart, Ph.D. Dissertation, Illinois Institute of Technology, 1970 (unpublished)