Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Measurement of the Kμ3+ Decay Parameters

D. Haidt and J. Stein (X2 Collaboration)

S. Natali, G. Piscitelli, and F. Romano

E. Fett

J. Lemonne*, T. I. Pedersen, and S. N. Tovey

V. Brisson and P. Petiau

C. D. Esveld and J. J. M. Timmermans

B. Aubert, L. M. Chounet, and Le Dong

F. Bobisut, H. Huzita, and F. Sconza

A. Marzari-Chiesa and A. E. Werbrouck

  • III. Physikalisches Institut der Technischen Hochschule, Aachen, Germany

  • Istituto di Fisica dell'Università di Bari, Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Bari, Italy

  • Fysisk Institutt, Universitetet i Bergen, Norway

  • CERN, Geneva, Switzerland

  • Ecole Polytechnique, Paris, France

  • Fysisch Laboratorium, University of Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands

  • Laboratoire de l'Accélérateur Linéaire, Orsay, France

  • Istituto di Fisica dell'Università di Padova, Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Padova, Italy

  • Istituto di Fisica dell'Università di Torino, Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Torino, Italy

  • *Now at Université Libre de Bruxelles, Belgium.

Phys. Rev. D 3, 10 – Published 1 January, 1971

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.3.10

Abstract

A sample of K+ mesons stopped in the CERN 1.1-m3 heavy-liquid bubble chamber has been used to study the Dalitz-plot density and the μ+ polarization in Kμ3+ decay and to measure the Kμ3+ and Ke3+ branching ratios. All three analyses are described in detail, and they are used, separately and combined, to study the form of the strangeness-changing, semileptonic weak interaction. This is found to be consistent with a coupling of vector currents and to be invariant under time reversal. The vector form factors are studied with a wide range of assumptions as to their possible four-momentum (q2) dependence, and the results of all three measurements are in agreement. If λ+ is fixed at 0.029 (the average value from Ke3+ experiments) and if ξ is assumed to be independent of q2, then the result is ξ=0.65±0.13. Assuming that f+(q2) and ξ(q2) are both linear functions of q2, a three-parameter fit gives λ+=0.060±0.019, ξ(0)=1.0±0.5, and ξ(5.1mπ2)=0.97±0.20.

References (31)

  1. J. W. Cronin, in Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on High-Energy Physics, Vienna, 1968, edited by J. Prentki and J. Steinberger (CERN, Geneva, 1968), p. 281
  2. M. L. Longo, K. K. Young, and J. A. Helland, Phys. Rev. 181, 1808 (1969) D. Bartlett, C. E. Friedberg, K. Goulianos, and D. Hutchinson, Phys. Rev. Letters 16, 282 (1966) 16, 601 (1966) R. J. Abrams, A. Abashian, R. E. Mischke, B. M. K. Nefkens, J. H. Smith, R. C. Thatcher, L. J. Verhey, and A. Wattenberg, Phys. Rev. 176, 1603 (1968)
  3. J. Bettels , Nuovo Cimento 56A, 1106 (1968) T. Eichten , Phys. Letters 27B, 586 (1968) D. Haidt , 29B, 691 (1968) 29B, 696 (1968)
  4. T. D. Lee and C. S. Wu, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Sci. 16, 471 (1966)
  5. D. E. Neville, Phys. Rev. 124, 2037 (1961)
  6. E. S. Ginsberg, Phys. Rev. 142, 1035 (1966)
  7. C. Rubbia, in Proceedings of the Topical Conference on Weak Interactions, CERN, 1969, p. 227 [CERN Report No. 69-7 (unpublished)]
  8. Particle Data Group, Rev. Mod. Phys. 41, 109 (1969)
  9. L. Behr and P. Mittner, in Proceedings of the Informal Meeting on Geometry Programs for Heavy-Liquid Bubble Chambers [CERN Report No. 63-23, 1963 (unpublished)]
  10. A. Buhler, T. Massam, Th. Muller, M. Schneegans, and A. Zichichi, Nuovo Cimento 39, 812 (1965) 39, 823 (1965)
  11. A. C. Callahan, U. Camerini, R. D. Hantman, R. H. March, D. L. Murphree, G. Gidal, G. E. Kalmus, W. M. Powell, C. L. Sandler, R. T. Pu, S. Natali, and M. Villani, Phys. Rev. 150, 1153 (1966)
  12. D. Cutts, R. Stiening, C. Wiegand, and M. Deutsch, Phys. Rev. Letters 20, 955 (1968)
  13. E. Bellotti, E. Fiorini, and A. Pullia, Nuovo Cimento 52A, 1287 (1967)
  14. D. R. Botterill, R. M. Brown, A. B. Clegg, I. F. Corbett, G. Culligan, J. McL. Emmerson, R. C. Field, J. Garvey, P. B. Jones, N. Middlemas, D. Newton, T. W. Quirk, G. L. Salmon, P. Steinberg, and W. S. C. Williams, Phys. Rev. 174, 1661 (1968)
  15. W. J. Willis, in Proceedings of the Heidelberg International Conference on Elementary Particles, 1967, edited by H. Filthuth (Interscience, New York, 1967), p. 273
  16. P. K. Kijewski, Ph.D. thesis, LRL Report No. UCRL-18433, 1969 (unpublished)
  17. D. W. Carpenter, A. Abashian, R. J. Abrams, G. P. Fisher, B. M. K. Nefkens, and J. H. Smith, Phys. Rev. 142, 871 (1966)
  18. S. Weinberg in [1], p. 253 C. Callan in [8], p. 263 M. K. Gaillard and L. M. Chounet, CERN Report No. 70-14, 1970 (unpublished)
  19. D. R. Botterill, R. M. Brown, A. B. Clegg, I. F. Corbett, G. Culligan, J. Mch. Emmerson, R. C. Field, J. Garvey, P. B. Jones, N. Middlemas, D. Newton, T. W. Quirk, G. L. Salmon, P. H. Steinberg, and W. S. C. Williams, Phys. Letters 31B, 325 (1970)
  20. S. V. Lo, Nucl. Phys. B7, 68 (1968)
  21. C. G. Callan and S. B. Treiman, Phys. Rev. Letters 16, 153 (1966)
  22. B. Renner, in Proceedings of the Lund International Conference on Elementary Particles, Lund, 1969, edited by G. von Dardel (Berlingska, Lund, Sweden, 1969), p. 223
  23. B. d'Espagnat and M. K. Gaillard, Phys. Letters 25B, 346 (1967)
  24. S. Fubini and G. Furlan, Physics 1, 229 (1965)
  25. N. Cabibbo, in Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on High-Energy Physics, Berkeley, 1966 (University of California Press, Berkeley, Calif., 1967)
  26. N. Cabibbo and A. Maksymowicz, Phys. Letters 9, 352 (1964)

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation