Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Polarization asymmetry in dilepton production in perturbative quantum chromodynamics

R. P. Bajpai

M. Noman*

R. Ramachandran

  • Department of Physics, Himachal Pradesh University, Simla 171 005, India

  • Department of Physics, Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur 208 016, India

  • Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14627 and Department of Physics, Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur 208 016, India

  • *Present address: Department of Physics, Bihar National College, Patna 800004, India.
  • Permanent address.

Phys. Rev. D 24, 1832 – Published 1 October, 1981

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.24.1832

Abstract

Quantum-chromodynamics (QCD) evolution equations together with angular momentum sum rules are used to examine the polarization structures of the quark sea and gluons in hadrons. It is shown that it is possible to sustain large polarizations of the flavor-singlet components and they would in turn imply large asymmetries in the dilepton production by polarized beam on polarized target, which can be calculated in perturbative QCD. At high qT for the μ+μ pair, the main contributing diagram is quark-gluon Compton scattering, and the extent of gluon polarization is expected to be revealed in this kinematic region. At lower qT the quark-antiquark annihilation diagram becomes increasingly important and correspondingly polarized-sea-quark-induced asymmetries are to be found in this region. Further, since the polarization depends on the number of flavors excited, as the available energy in the hadron collision changes, the magnitude of asymmetries should show dramatic variations.

References (16)

  1. R. P. Bajpai and R. Ramachandran, Phys. Lett. 97B, 125 (1980)
  2. S. D. Drell and T. M. Yan, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 66, 595 (1971) H. Fritzsch and P. Minkowski, Phys. Lett. 73B, 80 (1978) G. Altarelli, G. Parisi, and R. Petronzio, ibid. 76B, 351 (1978)
  3. J. Kuti and V. E. Weisskopf, Phys. Rev. D 4, 3418 (1971)
  4. J. D. Bjorken, Phys. Rev. 148, 1467 (1966)
  5. L. M. Sehgal, Phys. Rev. D 10, 1663 (1974)
  6. R. Carlitz and J. Kaur, Phys. Rev. Lett. 38, 673 (1977) ibid.38, 1102 (1977) J. Kaur, Nucl. Phys. B128, 219 (1977)
  7. J. Babcock, E. Monsay, and D. Sivers, Phys. Rev. D 19, 1483 (1979)
  8. F. E. Close and D. Sivers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 39, 1116 (1977)
  9. G. Altarelli and G. Parisi, Nucl. Phys. B126, 298 (1977)
  10. H. S. Mani and M. Noman, Phys. Rev. D 24, 1223 (1981)
  11. S. Pakvasa, D. Parashar, and S. F. Tuan, Phys. Rev. D 10, 2124 (1974)
  12. R. F. Peierla, T. L. Trueman, and L. L. Wang, Phys. Rev. D 16, 1397 (1977)
  13. M. Gluck and E. Reya, Nucl. Phys. B130, 76 (1977)
  14. R. P. Bajpai and J. K. Choudhary, Phys. Rev. D 22, 2290 (1980)
  15. Omitted endnote

  16. [E. A. Crosbie et al., Phys. Rev. D 23, 600 (1981)]

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation