Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Relation between the Multi-Regge Model and the Amati-Bertocchi-Fubini-Stanghellini-Tonin Pion-Exchange Multiperipheral Model

Geoffrey F. Chew, Terence Rogers*, and Dale R. Snider

  • Department of Physics and Lawrence Radiation Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720

  • *Present address: Cavendish Laboratory, Cambridge, England.

Phys. Rev. D 2, 765 – Published 15 August, 1970

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.2.765

Abstract

The 1962 Amati-Bertocchi-Fubini-Stanghellini-Tonin (ABFST) multiperipheral model, with a kernel based on an up-to-date guess for the elastic ππ cross section, is used to illuminate certain controversial concepts that have arisen in multi-Regge models. The small magnitude of the elastic ππ cross section above the region of prominent resonances is related to the small diffraction-dissociation cross section and to the small Pomeranchon coupling constant in the Chew-Pignotti (CP) model. Although lower trajectories in the multi-Regge kernel give an inadequate representation of low-subenergy resonances, we show that an artificial CP-model input can be found which roughly simulates the resonance component of the ABFST kernel. Byproducts of our investigations are (1) a generalization of the Berestetsky-Pomeranchuk formula that provides a practical basis for exact numerical evaluation of the ABFST model at any energy, and (2) a perturbative analysis of diffractive dissociation (d.d.) which reconciles a small d.d. cross section at accessible energies with a total cross section that becomes entirely of the d.d. type in the extreme high-energy limit.

References (25)

  1. G. F. Chew and A. Pignotti, Phys. Rev. 176, 2112 (1968)
  2. G. F. Chew, F. E. Low, and M. L. Goldberger, Phys. Rev. Letters 22, 208 (1969)
  3. I. G. Halliday and L. M. Saunders, Nuovo Cimento 60, 494 (1969)
  4. L. Caneschi and A. Pignotti, Phys. Rev. 180, 1525 (1969) ibid.184, 1915 (1969)
  5. G. F. Chew and W. R. Frazer, Phys. Rev. 181, 1914 (1969)
  6. W. R. Frazer and C. H. Mehta, Phys. Rev. Letters 23, 258 (1969)
  7. J. Ball and G. Marchesini, Phys. Rev. 188, 2209 (1969) ibid.188, 2508 (1969)
  8. L. Bertocchi, S. Fubini, and M. Tonin, Nuovo Cimento 25, 626 (1962) D. Amati, A. Stanghellini, and S. Fubini, ibid. 26, 6 (1962)
  9. Z. Ajduk, L. Michejda, and W. Wójcik, INR (Warsaw) Report No. 1088/VI/PH (unpublished)
  10. G. F. Chew and C. DeTar, Phys. Rev. 180, 1577 (1969)
  11. A. H. Mueller and I. J. Muzinich, Ann. Phys. (N. Y.) (to be published)
  12. M. Ciafaloni, C. DeTar, and M. Misheloff, Phys. Rev. 188, 2522 (1969)
  13. N. F. Bali, G. F. Chew, and A. Pignotti, Phys. Rev. 163, 1572 (1967) Phys. Rev. Letters 19, 614 (1967)
  14. Omitted endnote

  15. V. B. Berestetsky and I. Ya. Pomeranchuk, Zh. Eksperim. i Teor. Fiz. 12, 752 (1961) [Soviet Phys. JETP 39, 1078 (1960)] V. B. BerestetskyI. Ya. PomeranchukNucl. Phys. 22, 629 (1961)
  16. S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. Letters 17, 616 (1966)
  17. R. J. Deck, Phys. Rev. Letters 13, 169 (1964)
  18. O. Cyzyewski, in Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on High-Energy Physics, Vienna, 1968, edited by J. Prentki and J. Steinberger (CERN, Geneva, 1968), p. 367
  19. M. Ciafaloni and C. DeTar, Phys. Rev. D 1, 2917 (1970)
  20. G. F. Chew and D. R. Snider, Phys. Rev. D 1, 3453 (1970)
  21. D. Tow, Phys. Rev. D 2, 154 (1970) P. D. B. Collins and R. Johnson [Phys. Rev. 185, 2020 (1969) ibid.177, 2472 (1969)]
  22. Gunter Wolf, Phys. Rev. 182, 1538 (1969)
  23. Omitted endnote

  24. C. Lovelace, Phys. Letters 28B, 264 (1968)
  25. J. Shapiro, Phys. Rev. 179, 1345 (1969)

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation