- Access by Xinjiang University
Double-Pion Production Reactions in Collisions at 2.8
Phys. Rev. D 2, 463 – Published 1 August, 1970
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.2.463
Abstract
The reactions , , and at incident laboratory momentum are analyzed with data from the Brookhaven National Laboratory 20-in. bubble chamber. isobar production in these channels is studied. It is found that the absorptive single-pion-exchange model cannot adequately explain all the features of simultaneous isobar production in these reactions. When the reactions are compared with their counterpart , the former are found to be less peripheral than the latter, in sharp disagreement with a prediction of the model. A generalized single-pion-exchange model is discussed which gives better agreement with the nucleon-pion two-body mass and angular distributions. Some evidence for enhancements in the nucleon and antinucleon dipion systems at 1400 MeV is discussed.
References (13)
- T. C. Bacon, F. Bomse, T. B. Borak, T. B. Cochran, W. J. Fickinger, E. R. Goza, H. W. K. Hopkins, and E. O. Salant, Phys. Rev. Letters 22, 43 (1969)
- T. C. Bacon, F. M. Bomse, T. B. Cochran, W. J. Fickinger, E. R. Goza, H. W. K. Hopkins, and E. O. Salant, Phys. Rev. 162, 1320 (1967)
- J. K. Kopp, BNL-BCG Internal Reports F-120 and F-122, 1964 (unpublished) UCRL Internal Report No. UCRL-9099, edited by A. H. Rosenfeld, 1964 (unpublished) J. P. Berge, F. T. Solmitz, and H. D. Taft, Rev. Sci. Instr. 32, 538 (1961)
- J. W. Burren and J. Sparrow, National Institute for Research in Nuclear Science Report No. NIRL/R/14, 1963 (unpublished) A. G. William, National Institute for Research in Nuclear Science Report No. NIRL/M/38, 1962 (unpublished) A. G. WilliamGeometry Program Manual (Rutherford High-Energy Laboratory, Chilton, Didcot, Berkshire, England, 1968) A. G. WilliamKinematics Program Manual (Rutherford High-Energy Laboratory, Chilton, Didcot, Berkshire, England, 1968) A. G. WilliamGeometry Testing Program Optical Constants, (Rutherford High-Energy Laboratory, Chilton, Didcot, Berkshire, England, 1968)
- T. C. Bacon, H. W. K. Hopkins, D. K. Robinson, E. O. Salant, A. Engler, H. E. Fisk, C. M. Meltzer, and J. Westgard, Phys. Rev. 139, B1420 (1965)
- R. J. Abrams, R. L. Cool, G. Giacomelli, T. F. Kycia, B. A. Leontić, K. K. Li, and D. N. Michael, Phys. Rev. Letters 18, 1209 (1967)
- R. J. Glauber, Phys. Rev. 100, 242 (1955)
- V. Franco and R. J. Glauber, Phys. Rev. 142, 1195 (1966)
- J. D. Jackson, Rev. Mod. Phys. 37, 484 (1965) J. D. Jackson, J. T. Donohue, K. Gottfried, R. Keyser, and B. E. Y. Svennson, Phys. Rev. 139, B428 (1965)
- G. H. Hite and J. D. Jackson, University of Illinois, Urbana, Ill. (private communication)
- E. R. Pickup, D. K. Robinson, and E. O. Salant, Phys. Rev. 125, 2091 (1962)
- D. C. Wood, T. J. Devlin, J. A. Helland, M. J. Longo, B. J. Moyer, and V. Perez-Mendez, Phys. Rev. Letters 6, 481 (1961) J. A. Helland, T. J. Devlin, D. E. Hagge, M. J. Longo, and B. J. Moyer, Phys. Rev. 134, B1079 (1964) P. M. Ogden et al., ibid. 137, B1115 (1965) J. A. Helland et al., ibid. 134, B1062 (1964) G. Källén, Elementary Particle Physics (Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1964), p. 72
- L. David Roper, Phys. Rev. Letters 12, 340 (1964) G. Cocconi et al., Phys. Letters 8, 134 (1964) C. M. Ankenbrandt et al., Nuovo Cimento 35, 1052 (1965) G. Belletini et al., Phys. Letters 18, 167 (1965) E. W. Anderson et al., Phys. Rev. Letters 16, 855 (1966) I. M. Blair et al., ibid. 17, 789 (1966) K. J. Foley et al., ibid. 19, 397 (1967) S. L. Adelman, ibid. 13, 555 (1964) E. Gellert et al., ibid. 17, 884 (1966) S. P. Almeida et al., Nuovo Cimento 50A, 1000 (1967) R. B. Bell et al., Phys. Rev. Letters 20, 164 (1968) E. L. Berger et al., ibid. 20, 964 (1968) W. E. Ellis et al., ibid. 21, 697 (1968) R. A. Jesperson et al., ibid. 21, 1368 (1968)